Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas
Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Leberger, Roxanne [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold - Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER, 2013, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:241 ; year:2020 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV049280120 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV049280120 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626023923.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200518s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV049280120 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 22 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 46.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Leberger, Roxanne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. | ||
| 520 | |a Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a IPBES subregion |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Forest loss |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Protected areas audit |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Forest conservation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a IUCN protected areas |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rosa, Isabel M.D. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guerra, Carlos A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wolf, Florian |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pereira, Henrique M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER |t Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |d 2013 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV011767626 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:241 |g year:2020 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_77 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 46.00 |j Tiermedizin: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 241 |j 2020 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
r l rl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
lebergerroxannerosaisabelmdguerracarlosa:2020----:lblatrsfoetoscosunaeoi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
46.00 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica (DE-627)ELV049280120 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Leberger, Roxanne verfasserin aut Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Elsevier Rosa, Isabel M.D. oth Guerra, Carlos A. oth Wolf, Florian oth Pereira, Henrique M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 241 2020 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica (DE-627)ELV049280120 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Leberger, Roxanne verfasserin aut Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Elsevier Rosa, Isabel M.D. oth Guerra, Carlos A. oth Wolf, Florian oth Pereira, Henrique M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 241 2020 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica (DE-627)ELV049280120 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Leberger, Roxanne verfasserin aut Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Elsevier Rosa, Isabel M.D. oth Guerra, Carlos A. oth Wolf, Florian oth Pereira, Henrique M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 241 2020 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica (DE-627)ELV049280120 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Leberger, Roxanne verfasserin aut Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Elsevier Rosa, Isabel M.D. oth Guerra, Carlos A. oth Wolf, Florian oth Pereira, Henrique M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 241 2020 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica (DE-627)ELV049280120 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Leberger, Roxanne verfasserin aut Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Elsevier Rosa, Isabel M.D. oth Guerra, Carlos A. oth Wolf, Florian oth Pereira, Henrique M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 241 2020 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:241 year:2020 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Tiermedizin: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
IPBES subregion Forest loss Protected areas audit Forest conservation IUCN protected areas |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Leberger, Roxanne @@aut@@ Rosa, Isabel M.D. @@oth@@ Guerra, Carlos A. @@oth@@ Wolf, Florian @@oth@@ Pereira, Henrique M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV011767626 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV049280120 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049280120</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626023923.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200518s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049280120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leberger, Roxanne</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IPBES subregion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forest loss</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Protected areas audit</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forest conservation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IUCN protected areas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rosa, Isabel M.D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guerra, Carlos A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wolf, Florian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pereira, Henrique M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011767626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:241</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Tiermedizin: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">241</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Leberger, Roxanne |
| spellingShingle |
Leberger, Roxanne ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 Elsevier IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas |
| authorStr |
Leberger, Roxanne |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV011767626 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 610 - Medicine & health 630 - Agriculture & related technologies |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 Elsevier IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 Elsevier IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 Elsevier IPBES subregion Elsevier Forest loss Elsevier Protected areas audit Elsevier Forest conservation Elsevier IUCN protected areas |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
i m r im imr c a g ca cag f w fw h m p hm hmp |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV011767626 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 610 - Medicine & health 630 - Agriculture |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV011767626 |
| title |
Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV049280120 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4 |
| title_full |
Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas |
| author_sort |
Leberger, Roxanne |
| journal |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| journalStr |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Leberger, Roxanne |
| container_volume |
241 |
| class |
540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Leberger, Roxanne |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 |
| dewey-full |
540 610 630 |
| title_sort |
global patterns of forest loss across iucn categories of protected areas |
| title_auth |
Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas |
| abstract |
Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. |
| abstractGer |
Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 |
| title_short |
Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Rosa, Isabel M.D. Guerra, Carlos A. Wolf, Florian Pereira, Henrique M. |
| author2Str |
Rosa, Isabel M.D. Guerra, Carlos A. Wolf, Florian Pereira, Henrique M. |
| ppnlink |
ELV011767626 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T21:08:07.390Z |
| _version_ |
1803865384436105216 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049280120</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626023923.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200518s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001153.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049280120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(19)30100-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leberger, Roxanne</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forests are under increasing pressure globally and the establishment of protected areas has long been used as a conservation tool to preserve them. Seven categories of protected areas have been defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with different management objectives and protection levels. However, recent studies raised questions over whether protected areas are effective in preventing ecosystem degradation and whether IUCN categories vary in their effectiveness. In this study, we analysed forest loss and trends between 2001 and 2014 within IUCN protected areas at a global scale and within sixteen Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services (IPBES) subregions, relevant for international policy. As habitat protection can be driven by the location of protected areas and as the amount of forest within protected sites is highly unequal, we reported the forest loss integrating the proximity of roads and population, as well as the amount of initial forest in 2000. Our results show that worldwide, the highest protection categories experienced less forest loss than those allowing more human intervention, although this result was reversed in three IPBES subregions. Moreover, in four subregions there was more forest loss within protected areas than outside. We also found accelerating rates of forest loss in protected areas across all IUCN categories, more pronounced in the highest protection IUCN categories. Our results highlight the importance of moving the discussion of the post-2020 biodiversity framework for protected areas beyond simple general areal targets and that areas with poor implementation effectiveness should benefit from additional support.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IPBES subregion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forest loss</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Protected areas audit</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forest conservation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IUCN protected areas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rosa, Isabel M.D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guerra, Carlos A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wolf, Florian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pereira, Henrique M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011767626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:241</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Tiermedizin: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">241</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400508 |