Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)

The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the commen...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Levy, Elan J. [verfasserIn] Sivan, Orit Antler, Gilad Stein, Mordechai Lazar, Boaz Yechieli, Yossi Gavrieli, Ittai

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020transfer abstract

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: CME examination - 2014, the international multidisciplinary research and review journal, Amsterdam [u.a.]
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:231 ; year:2020 ; day:1 ; month:03 ; pages:0

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111

Katalog-ID:	ELV049462458

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV049462458
003	DE-627
005	20230626024424.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	200518s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV049462458
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q VZ
082	0	4	\|a 333.7 \|a 610 \|q VZ
084			\|a 43.12 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 43.13 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 44.13 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Levy, Elan J. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
264		1	\|c 2020transfer abstract
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b z \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zu \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.
520			\|a The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.
700	1		\|a Sivan, Orit \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Antler, Gilad \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Stein, Mordechai \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Lazar, Boaz \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Yechieli, Yossi \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Gavrieli, Ittai \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|n Elsevier \|t CME examination \|d 2014 \|d the international multidisciplinary research and review journal \|g Amsterdam [u.a.] \|w (DE-627)ELV012176508
773	1	8	\|g volume:231 \|g year:2020 \|g day:1 \|g month:03 \|g pages:0
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a SSG-OPC-GGO
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_30
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
936	b	k	\|a 43.12 \|j Umweltchemie \|q VZ
936	b	k	\|a 43.13 \|j Umwelttoxikologie \|q VZ
936	b	k	\|a 44.13 \|j Medizinische Ökologie \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 231 \|j 2020 \|b 1 \|c 0301 \|h 0

Indexfelder

author_variant	e j l ej ejl
matchkey_str	levyelanjsivanoritantlergiladsteinmordec:2020----:eltcarc21cmetnonsdmatiproreoslaeelnsmnadysmuestrtoitea
hierarchy_sort_str	2020transfer abstract
bklnumber	43.12 43.13 44.13
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica (DE-627)ELV049462458 (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Levy, Elan J. verfasserin aut Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019) 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. Sivan, Orit oth Antler, Gilad oth Stein, Mordechai oth Lazar, Boaz oth Yechieli, Yossi oth Gavrieli, Ittai oth Enthalten in Elsevier CME examination 2014 the international multidisciplinary research and review journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012176508 volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 231 2020 1 0301 0
spelling	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica (DE-627)ELV049462458 (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Levy, Elan J. verfasserin aut Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019) 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. Sivan, Orit oth Antler, Gilad oth Stein, Mordechai oth Lazar, Boaz oth Yechieli, Yossi oth Gavrieli, Ittai oth Enthalten in Elsevier CME examination 2014 the international multidisciplinary research and review journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012176508 volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 231 2020 1 0301 0
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica (DE-627)ELV049462458 (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Levy, Elan J. verfasserin aut Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019) 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. Sivan, Orit oth Antler, Gilad oth Stein, Mordechai oth Lazar, Boaz oth Yechieli, Yossi oth Gavrieli, Ittai oth Enthalten in Elsevier CME examination 2014 the international multidisciplinary research and review journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012176508 volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 231 2020 1 0301 0
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica (DE-627)ELV049462458 (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Levy, Elan J. verfasserin aut Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019) 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. Sivan, Orit oth Antler, Gilad oth Stein, Mordechai oth Lazar, Boaz oth Yechieli, Yossi oth Gavrieli, Ittai oth Enthalten in Elsevier CME examination 2014 the international multidisciplinary research and review journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012176508 volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 231 2020 1 0301 0
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica (DE-627)ELV049462458 (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Levy, Elan J. verfasserin aut Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019) 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake. Sivan, Orit oth Antler, Gilad oth Stein, Mordechai oth Lazar, Boaz oth Yechieli, Yossi oth Gavrieli, Ittai oth Enthalten in Elsevier CME examination 2014 the international multidisciplinary research and review journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012176508 volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 231 2020 1 0301 0
language	English
source	Enthalten in CME examination Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0
sourceStr	Enthalten in CME examination Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:231 year:2020 day:1 month:03 pages:0
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Umweltchemie Umwelttoxikologie Medizinische Ökologie
institution	findex.gbv.de
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	CME examination
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Levy, Elan J. @@aut@@ Sivan, Orit @@oth@@ Antler, Gilad @@oth@@ Stein, Mordechai @@oth@@ Lazar, Boaz @@oth@@ Yechieli, Yossi @@oth@@ Gavrieli, Ittai @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	ELV012176508
dewey-sort	3610
id	ELV049462458
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049462458</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626024424.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200518s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049462458</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levy, Elan J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sivan, Orit</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antler, Gilad</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stein, Mordechai</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lazar, Boaz</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yechieli, Yossi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavrieli, Ittai</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">CME examination</subfield><subfield code="d">2014</subfield><subfield code="d">the international multidisciplinary research and review journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV012176508</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:231</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttoxikologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">231</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0301</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Levy, Elan J.
spellingShingle	Levy, Elan J. ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
authorStr	Levy, Elan J.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)ELV012176508
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health 333 - Economics of land & energy
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
topic_title	610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
topic	ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13
topic_browse	ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	zu
author2_variant	o s os g a ga m s ms b l bl y y yy i g ig
hierarchy_parent_title	CME examination
hierarchy_parent_id	ELV012176508
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health 330 - Economics
hierarchy_top_title	CME examination
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)ELV012176508
title	Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV049462458 (ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4
title_full	Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
author_sort	Levy, Elan J.
journal	CME examination
journalStr	CME examination
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	0
author_browse	Levy, Elan J.
container_volume	231
class	610 VZ 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Levy, Elan J.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111
dewey-full	610 333.7
title_sort	reply to charrach (2019) comment on “mount sedom salt diapir - source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial dead sea (lake lisan)” by levy et al. (2019)
title_auth	Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
abstract	The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.
abstractGer	The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.
abstract_unstemmed	The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70
title_short	Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111
remote_bool	true
author2	Sivan, Orit Antler, Gilad Stein, Mordechai Lazar, Boaz Yechieli, Yossi Gavrieli, Ittai
author2Str	Sivan, Orit Antler, Gilad Stein, Mordechai Lazar, Boaz Yechieli, Yossi Gavrieli, Ittai
ppnlink	ELV012176508
mediatype_str_mv	z
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth oth oth oth oth oth
doi_str	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111
up_date	2024-07-06T21:39:26.992Z
_version_	1803867355342700544
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV049462458</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626024424.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200518s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000000919.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV049462458</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0277-3791(19)31084-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levy, Elan J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main comment by Charrach (2019) on the Levy et al. (2019) paper is that the Sedom salt diapir could not have been a source for sulfate to Lake Lisan (last glacial Dead Sea), arguing that the dissolution of the salt diapir started following the onset of the Holocene Dead Sea. We refute the comment for the following reasons: (1) The nature of the unconformity between the salt diapir and the overlying sediments indicates that it emerged from the surface prior to the last glacial and was submerged in Lake Lisan; (2) The formation of a ∼40 m thick layer of dissolution residue (caprock) sitting on an almost flat dissolution unconformity surface (salt mirror) suggests that 600 m-to-800 m thick layer of Sedom Fm. was dissolved under phreatic settings. During most of the Holocene, the diapir has been subjected to vadose type dissolution which formed karst cutting through the caprock, salt mirror and rock-salt below; (3) Based on the Charrach (2019) hypothesis, estimated diapir uplift rates during the early Holocene would have required to be an order of magnitude higher than the measured and calculated rates for the present and Holocene, respectively, provided by other studies; (4) Na/Ca ratios from primary aragonite in the Lisan Fm. found at the vicinity of Mt. Sedom, as well as Na/Cl ratios, saturation state of halite and isotopic composition of chloride in the pore fluids from the deep Dead Sea Deep Drilling Project (DSDDP) core 5017-1-A, suggests significant dissolution of halite from Mt. Sedom into Lake Lisan. In addition to halite, dissolution of the next abundant evaporite mineral, anhydrite, resulted in mobilization of sulfate to the lake.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sivan, Orit</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antler, Gilad</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stein, Mordechai</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lazar, Boaz</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yechieli, Yossi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavrieli, Ittai</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">CME examination</subfield><subfield code="d">2014</subfield><subfield code="d">the international multidisciplinary research and review journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV012176508</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:231</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106111</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttoxikologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">231</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0301</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401026

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Reply to Charrach (2019) comment on “Mount Sedom salt diapir - Source for sulfate replenishment and gypsum supersaturation in the last glacial Dead Sea (Lake Lisan)” by Levy et al. (2019)

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?