Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel
Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investiga...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites - Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER, 2016transfer abstract, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:35 ; year:2020 ; number:6 ; pages:600-608 ; extent:9 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV051221772 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV051221772 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626031730.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV051221772 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. | ||
| 520 | |a Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Diversion angle |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Lowest diversion sediment concentration |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sediment concentration |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Diversion channel |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Bed width ratio |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yusuf, Badronnisa |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghazali, Abdul Halim |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER |t Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites |d 2016transfer abstract |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV01430435X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2020 |g number:6 |g pages:600-608 |g extent:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 35 |j 2020 |e 6 |h 600-608 |g 9 | ||
| author_variant |
n k a nk nka |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
alomarinashwankamalaldeenyusufbadronnisa:2020----:nlecodvrinnlowtrnsdmnfoi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica (DE-627)ELV051221772 (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen verfasserin aut Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel 2020transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Elsevier Yusuf, Badronnisa oth Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad oth Ghazali, Abdul Halim oth Enthalten in Elsevier Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites 2016transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01430435X volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 AR 35 2020 6 600-608 9 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica (DE-627)ELV051221772 (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen verfasserin aut Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel 2020transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Elsevier Yusuf, Badronnisa oth Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad oth Ghazali, Abdul Halim oth Enthalten in Elsevier Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites 2016transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01430435X volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 AR 35 2020 6 600-608 9 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica (DE-627)ELV051221772 (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen verfasserin aut Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel 2020transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Elsevier Yusuf, Badronnisa oth Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad oth Ghazali, Abdul Halim oth Enthalten in Elsevier Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites 2016transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01430435X volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 AR 35 2020 6 600-608 9 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica (DE-627)ELV051221772 (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen verfasserin aut Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel 2020transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Elsevier Yusuf, Badronnisa oth Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad oth Ghazali, Abdul Halim oth Enthalten in Elsevier Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites 2016transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01430435X volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 AR 35 2020 6 600-608 9 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica (DE-627)ELV051221772 (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen verfasserin aut Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel 2020transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Elsevier Yusuf, Badronnisa oth Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad oth Ghazali, Abdul Halim oth Enthalten in Elsevier Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites 2016transfer abstract Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01430435X volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 AR 35 2020 6 600-608 9 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:35 year:2020 number:6 pages:600-608 extent:9 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Diversion angle Lowest diversion sediment concentration Sediment concentration Diversion channel Bed width ratio |
| dewey-raw |
670 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen @@aut@@ Yusuf, Badronnisa @@oth@@ Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad @@oth@@ Ghazali, Abdul Halim @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV01430435X |
| dewey-sort |
3670 |
| id |
ELV051221772 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV051221772</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626031730.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV051221772</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diversion angle</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lowest diversion sediment concentration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sediment concentration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diversion channel</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bed width ratio</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yusuf, Badronnisa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghazali, Abdul Halim</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites</subfield><subfield code="d">2016transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV01430435X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:600-608</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">600-608</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen |
| spellingShingle |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen ddc 670 ddc 540 ddc 630 Elsevier Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| authorStr |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV01430435X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 630 - Agriculture & related technologies |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 670 ddc 540 ddc 630 Elsevier Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 ddc 540 ddc 630 Elsevier Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio |
| topic_browse |
ddc 670 ddc 540 ddc 630 Elsevier Diversion angle Elsevier Lowest diversion sediment concentration Elsevier Sediment concentration Elsevier Diversion channel Elsevier Bed width ratio |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
b y by t a m ta tam a h g ah ahg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV01430435X |
| dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing 540 - Chemistry 630 - Agriculture |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV01430435X |
| title |
Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV051221772 (ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6 |
| title_full |
Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| author_sort |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen |
| journal |
Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites |
| journalStr |
Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
600 |
| author_browse |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen |
| container_volume |
35 |
| physical |
9 |
| class |
670 VZ 540 VZ 630 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 |
| dewey-full |
670 540 630 |
| title_sort |
influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| title_auth |
Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| abstract |
Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. |
| abstractGer |
Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Yusuf, Badronnisa Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad Ghazali, Abdul Halim |
| author2Str |
Yusuf, Badronnisa Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad Ghazali, Abdul Halim |
| ppnlink |
ELV01430435X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:40:03.023Z |
| _version_ |
1803859843376742400 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV051221772</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626031730.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001118.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV051221772</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1001-6279(20)30070-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alomari, Nashwan Kamalaldeen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of diversion angle on water and sediment flow into diversion channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accumulation of the sediment in the stream of the diversion channels adversely affects its operational systems. Diversion channels are often constructed perpendicular to the main river. In this study, the water flow and sediment transport in the diversion channel with different angles were investigated in an attempt to maximize water discharge and minimize sediment discharge. A physical model with movable bed was used to simulate water and sediment flow with five diversion angles (θ) between (30°–90°). Moreover, three bed width ratios (Br) (the relation between diversion to main channel bed width) between 30% and 50% and five total discharges between (7.25 L/s to 12.25 L/s) were considered for each case of (θ). The results showed, up to 10%, increasing in proportion discharge ratios for 30 and 45 diversion angles compared with 90° diversion angle. The results also showed that the lowest diversion sediment concentration was provided by the (θ) of 30°. Across all scenarios, the average proportion concentration reduction was 64%, compared with 90° diversion angle. Closer observation of the diversion system mechanism confirmed that decreased (θ) result in decreased sediment concentrations in the diversion channels. In conclusion, the diversion channel water and sediment discharge could be effectively managed by changing the (θ) to 30° or 45° instead of 90°.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diversion angle</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lowest diversion sediment concentration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sediment concentration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diversion channel</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bed width ratio</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yusuf, Badronnisa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad, Thamer Ahmad</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghazali, Abdul Halim</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Yan, Xuehua ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Zero thermal expansion, electrical conductivity and hardness of Mn3Zn0.5Sn0.5N/Cu composites</subfield><subfield code="d">2016transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV01430435X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:600-608</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.06.006</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">600-608</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399928 |