Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory
Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Marques, Gonçalo M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial - Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER, 2016, international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:434 ; year:2020 ; day:15 ; month:10 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV051275171 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV051275171 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626031817.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV051275171 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Marques, Gonçalo M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. | ||
| 520 | |a Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sousa, Tânia |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morais, Tiago G. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Domingos, Tiago |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER |t Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial |d 2016 |d international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV014034964 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:434 |g year:2020 |g day:15 |g month:10 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 434 |j 2020 |b 15 |c 1015 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
g m m gm gmm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
marquesgonalomteixeiracarlosmglsousatnia:2020----:iiiigietrehueaeisosnietcpoutote |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
77.50 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica (DE-627)ELV051275171 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Marques, Gonçalo M. verfasserin aut Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. oth Sousa, Tânia oth Morais, Tiago G. oth Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. oth Domingos, Tiago oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial 2016 international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014034964 volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 434 2020 15 1015 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica (DE-627)ELV051275171 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Marques, Gonçalo M. verfasserin aut Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. oth Sousa, Tânia oth Morais, Tiago G. oth Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. oth Domingos, Tiago oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial 2016 international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014034964 volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 434 2020 15 1015 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica (DE-627)ELV051275171 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Marques, Gonçalo M. verfasserin aut Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. oth Sousa, Tânia oth Morais, Tiago G. oth Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. oth Domingos, Tiago oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial 2016 international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014034964 volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 434 2020 15 1015 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica (DE-627)ELV051275171 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Marques, Gonçalo M. verfasserin aut Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. oth Sousa, Tânia oth Morais, Tiago G. oth Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. oth Domingos, Tiago oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial 2016 international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014034964 volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 434 2020 15 1015 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica (DE-627)ELV051275171 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Marques, Gonçalo M. verfasserin aut Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. oth Sousa, Tânia oth Morais, Tiago G. oth Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. oth Domingos, Tiago oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial 2016 international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014034964 volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 434 2020 15 1015 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:434 year:2020 day:15 month:10 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Psychophysiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
620 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Marques, Gonçalo M. @@aut@@ Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. @@oth@@ Sousa, Tânia @@oth@@ Morais, Tiago G. @@oth@@ Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. @@oth@@ Domingos, Tiago @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV014034964 |
| dewey-sort |
3620 |
| id |
ELV051275171 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV051275171</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626031817.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV051275171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marques, Gonçalo M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sousa, Tânia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morais, Tiago G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teixeira, Ricardo F.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Domingos, Tiago</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="d">international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV014034964</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:434</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">434</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1015</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Marques, Gonçalo M. |
| spellingShingle |
Marques, Gonçalo M. ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| authorStr |
Marques, Gonçalo M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV014034964 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
620 - Engineering & allied operations 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| topic |
ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
c m t cm cmt t s ts t g m tg tgm r f t rf rft t d td |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV014034964 |
| dewey-tens |
620 - Engineering 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV014034964 |
| title |
Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV051275171 (ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X |
| title_full |
Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| author_sort |
Marques, Gonçalo M. |
| journal |
Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial |
| journalStr |
Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Marques, Gonçalo M. |
| container_volume |
434 |
| class |
620 VZ 610 VZ 77.50 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Marques, Gonçalo M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 |
| dewey-full |
620 610 |
| title_sort |
minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: the need for a metabolic theory |
| title_auth |
Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| abstract |
Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. |
| abstractGer |
Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. Sousa, Tânia Morais, Tiago G. Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. Domingos, Tiago |
| author2Str |
Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L. Sousa, Tânia Morais, Tiago G. Teixeira, Ricardo F.M. Domingos, Tiago |
| ppnlink |
ELV014034964 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:49:01.798Z |
| _version_ |
1803860408321179648 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV051275171</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626031817.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001265.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV051275171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0304-3800(20)30329-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marques, Gonçalo M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Minimizing direct greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: The need for a metabolic theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Livestock production is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tools provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to estimate GHG emissions (Tier 1 and Tier 2) cannot be used as a tool for advising farmers or national policy on how to minimize GHG emissions because these estimates are not explicitly related to any metabolic properties. For that, we need a metabolic model that obeys mass and energy balances and that models the trade-offs between different allocations of energy in the organism, throughout the life-cycle, as a function of environmental variables such as temperature and the amount and type of food. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory ensures mass conservation and models the transformations of state variable and product formation, allowing for explicit GHG emissions estimates. Therefore, we used this theory to build models for four bovine breeds – Alentejana, Angus, Charolais and Limousin. The goodness-of-fit of DEB models to data is good for all breeds. Differences in DEB breed specific parameters, such as the maximum reserve density and the maximum specific assimilation rate, explain differences in GHG emissions, ultimate lengths and weights and von Bertalanffy growth rates. Accumulated methane and nitrogen production ranges between 0.2 and 2, and 0.1 and 0.7 kg per kg of body weight, respectively. In terms of accumulated direct GHG emissions, there is a strong dependence on breed and age.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teixeira, Carlos M.G.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sousa, Tânia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morais, Tiago G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teixeira, Ricardo F.M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Domingos, Tiago</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Costa-Campi, M.T. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Special issue on European Union: Markets and regulators editorial</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="d">international journal on ecological modelling and systems ecology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV014034964</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:434</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109259</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">434</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1015</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400256 |