Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production
Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Yang, Qing [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO - Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER, 2020, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:273 ; year:2020 ; day:10 ; month:11 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV05129107X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV05129107X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626031833.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV05129107X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 35.18 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yang, Qing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. | ||
| 520 | |a Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Techno-economic analysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Competitiveness analysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Natural gas to ethylene glycol |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Coal to ethylene glycol |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Oil to ethylene glycol |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Qingchun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xu, Simin |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Shun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Dawei |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER |t Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |d 2020 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:273 |g year:2020 |g day:10 |g month:11 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.18 |j Kolloidchemie |j Grenzflächenchemie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 273 |j 2020 |b 10 |c 1110 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
q y qy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
yangqingyangqingchunxusiminzhushunzhangd:2020----:ehocnmcnevrnetlnlssftyeelclrdcinrmolnntrla |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
35.18 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica (DE-627)ELV05129107X (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Yang, Qing verfasserin aut Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Elsevier Yang, Qingchun oth Xu, Simin oth Zhu, Shun oth Zhang, Dawei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 273 2020 10 1110 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica (DE-627)ELV05129107X (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Yang, Qing verfasserin aut Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Elsevier Yang, Qingchun oth Xu, Simin oth Zhu, Shun oth Zhang, Dawei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 273 2020 10 1110 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica (DE-627)ELV05129107X (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Yang, Qing verfasserin aut Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Elsevier Yang, Qingchun oth Xu, Simin oth Zhu, Shun oth Zhang, Dawei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 273 2020 10 1110 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica (DE-627)ELV05129107X (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Yang, Qing verfasserin aut Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Elsevier Yang, Qingchun oth Xu, Simin oth Zhu, Shun oth Zhang, Dawei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 273 2020 10 1110 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica (DE-627)ELV05129107X (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Yang, Qing verfasserin aut Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Elsevier Yang, Qingchun oth Xu, Simin oth Zhu, Shun oth Zhang, Dawei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 273 2020 10 1110 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:273 year:2020 day:10 month:11 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Techno-economic analysis Competitiveness analysis Natural gas to ethylene glycol Coal to ethylene glycol Oil to ethylene glycol |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yang, Qing @@aut@@ Yang, Qingchun @@oth@@ Xu, Simin @@oth@@ Zhu, Shun @@oth@@ Zhang, Dawei @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-10T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003750353 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV05129107X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV05129107X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626031833.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV05129107X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Qing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Competitiveness analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Natural gas to ethylene glycol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Coal to ethylene glycol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oil to ethylene glycol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Qingchun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Simin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Shun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Dawei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:273</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">273</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">1110</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Yang, Qing |
| spellingShingle |
Yang, Qing ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| authorStr |
Yang, Qing |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 VZ 35.18 bkl Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Techno-economic analysis Elsevier Competitiveness analysis Elsevier Natural gas to ethylene glycol Elsevier Coal to ethylene glycol Elsevier Oil to ethylene glycol |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
q y qy s x sx s z sz d z dz |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003750353 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| title |
Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV05129107X (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6 |
| title_full |
Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| author_sort |
Yang, Qing |
| journal |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| journalStr |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Yang, Qing |
| container_volume |
273 |
| class |
540 VZ 35.18 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Yang, Qing |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 |
| dewey-full |
540 |
| title_sort |
technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| title_auth |
Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| abstract |
Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. |
| abstractGer |
Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Yang, Qingchun Xu, Simin Zhu, Shun Zhang, Dawei |
| author2Str |
Yang, Qingchun Xu, Simin Zhu, Shun Zhang, Dawei |
| ppnlink |
ELV003750353 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:51:53.028Z |
| _version_ |
1803860587869896704 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV05129107X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626031833.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001663.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV05129107X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(20)33165-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Qing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Increasing demand of ethylene glycol conflicts with the shortage of supply, forcing Chinese government to seek for its alternative production routes. Recently, many coal-to-ethylene glycol (CTEG) and natural gas to ethylene glycol (NGTEG) plants have been successfully operated. It is an urgent work to answer the question: compared with the conventional oil to ethylene glycol (OTEG) route, is it an opportunity or a challenge for the development of coal and natural gas alternative technologies? In this paper, the technical, economic and environmental performance of these two alternative technologies are assessed to quantify their opportunities and challenges in comparison with conventional OTEG route. Results show that the coal-based route has a significant cost advantage, however, it suffers from high energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, serious CO2 emissions and wastewater discharge. The technical and environmental performances of the natural gas-based route are better than those of coal-based route, but its total production cost and internal rate of return are worse than those of coal-based route process. Finally, several suggestions are proposed to improve the comprehensive performance of the two alternative processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Competitiveness analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Natural gas to ethylene glycol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Coal to ethylene glycol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oil to ethylene glycol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Qingchun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Simin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Shun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Dawei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:273</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123120</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">273</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">1110</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3991537 |