Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers
Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
de Boer, Marijn [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
12 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent - Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER, 2015, JMB, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:432 ; year:2020 ; number:20 ; day:18 ; month:09 ; pages:5565-5576 ; extent:12 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV051576074 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV051576074 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626032208.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV051576074 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a 42.13 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a de Boer, Marijn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 12 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. | ||
520 | |a Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Cordes, Thorben |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Poolman, Bert |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER |t Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent |d 2015 |d JMB |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV012766127 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:432 |g year:2020 |g number:20 |g day:18 |g month:09 |g pages:5565-5576 |g extent:12 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 42.13 |j Molekularbiologie |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 432 |j 2020 |e 20 |b 18 |c 0918 |h 5565-5576 |g 12 |
author_variant |
b m d bm bmd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
deboermarijncordesthorbenpoolmanbert:2020----:ieimdligfrnprihbtobsbt |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
42.13 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica (DE-627)ELV051576074 (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl de Boer, Marijn verfasserin aut Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers 2020transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Cordes, Thorben oth Poolman, Bert oth Enthalten in Elsevier Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent 2015 JMB Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012766127 volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 432 2020 20 18 0918 5565-5576 12 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica (DE-627)ELV051576074 (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl de Boer, Marijn verfasserin aut Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers 2020transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Cordes, Thorben oth Poolman, Bert oth Enthalten in Elsevier Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent 2015 JMB Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012766127 volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 432 2020 20 18 0918 5565-5576 12 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica (DE-627)ELV051576074 (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl de Boer, Marijn verfasserin aut Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers 2020transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Cordes, Thorben oth Poolman, Bert oth Enthalten in Elsevier Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent 2015 JMB Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012766127 volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 432 2020 20 18 0918 5565-5576 12 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica (DE-627)ELV051576074 (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl de Boer, Marijn verfasserin aut Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers 2020transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Cordes, Thorben oth Poolman, Bert oth Enthalten in Elsevier Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent 2015 JMB Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012766127 volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 432 2020 20 18 0918 5565-5576 12 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica (DE-627)ELV051576074 (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl de Boer, Marijn verfasserin aut Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers 2020transfer abstract 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. Cordes, Thorben oth Poolman, Bert oth Enthalten in Elsevier Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent 2015 JMB Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV012766127 volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 432 2020 20 18 0918 5565-5576 12 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:432 year:2020 number:20 day:18 month:09 pages:5565-5576 extent:12 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Molekularbiologie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
540 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
de Boer, Marijn @@aut@@ Cordes, Thorben @@oth@@ Poolman, Bert @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-18T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV012766127 |
dewey-sort |
3540 |
id |
ELV051576074 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV051576074</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626032208.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV051576074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Boer, Marijn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cordes, Thorben</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poolman, Bert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">JMB</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV012766127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:432</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:20</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:5565-5576</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Molekularbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">432</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">20</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">0918</subfield><subfield code="h">5565-5576</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
de Boer, Marijn |
spellingShingle |
de Boer, Marijn ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
authorStr |
de Boer, Marijn |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV012766127 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 660 - Chemical engineering |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
540 VZ 660 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
topic |
ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 |
topic_browse |
ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
t c tc b p bp |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV012766127 |
dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 660 - Chemical engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV012766127 |
title |
Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV051576074 (ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7 |
title_full |
Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
author_sort |
de Boer, Marijn |
journal |
Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent |
journalStr |
Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
5565 |
author_browse |
de Boer, Marijn |
container_volume |
432 |
physical |
12 |
class |
540 VZ 660 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
de Boer, Marijn |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 |
dewey-full |
540 660 |
title_sort |
kinetic modelling of transport inhibition by substrates in abc importers |
title_auth |
Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
abstract |
Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. |
abstractGer |
Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 |
container_issue |
20 |
title_short |
Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Cordes, Thorben Poolman, Bert |
author2Str |
Cordes, Thorben Poolman, Bert |
ppnlink |
ELV012766127 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T20:38:47.983Z |
_version_ |
1803863539564150784 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV051576074</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626032208.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001161.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV051576074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-2836(20)30492-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Boer, Marijn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kinetic Modelling of Transport Inhibition by Substrates in ABC Importers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prokaryotic ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers require a substrate-binding protein (SBP) for the capture and delivery of the cognate substrate to the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the transporter. Various biochemical compounds have been identified that bind to the SBP but are not transported. The mechanistic basis for the “non-cognate” substrates not being transported differs. Some non-cognate substrates fail to trigger the appropriate conformational change in the SBP, resulting in loss of affinity for the TMD or the inability to allosterically activate transport. In another mechanism, the SBP cannot release the bound non-cognate substrate. Here, we used rate equations to derive the steady-state transport rate of cognate substrates of an ABC importer and investigated how non-cognate substrates influence this rate. We found that under limiting non-cognate substrate concentrations, the transport rate remains unaltered for each of the mechanisms. In contrast, at saturating substrate and SBP concentrations, the effect of the non-cognate substrate depends heavily on the respective mechanism. For instance, the transport rate becomes zero when the non-cognate substrate cannot be released by the SBP. Yet it remains unaffected when substrate release is possible but the SBP cannot dock onto the TMDs. Our work shows how the different mechanisms of substrate inhibition impact the transport kinetics, which is relevant for understanding and manipulating solute fluxes and hence the propagation of cells in nutritionally complex milieus.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cordes, Thorben</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poolman, Bert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Wang, Yuntao ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Fabrication of chitin microspheres and their multipurpose application as catalyst support and adsorbent</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">JMB</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV012766127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:432</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:20</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:5565-5576</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.08.008</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Molekularbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">432</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">20</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">0918</subfield><subfield code="h">5565-5576</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3974285 |