An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews
Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Bidonde, Julia [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers - Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER, 2017transfer abstract, including pharmacoepidemiology reports, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:128 ; year:2020 ; pages:130-139 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV05213489X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV05213489X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626032903.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV05213489X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.63 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 44.69 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bidonde, Julia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. | ||
| 520 | |a Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Clinical trial protocol |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Protocols |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Trial registry records |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Reporting guidance |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Systematic reviews as topic |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Clinical trials |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Randomized controlled trial |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Busch, Angela J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boden, Catherine |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER |t Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers |d 2017transfer abstract |d including pharmacoepidemiology reports |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV015597881 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:128 |g year:2020 |g pages:130-139 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.63 |j Krankenpflege |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.69 |j Intensivmedizin |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 128 |j 2020 |h 130-139 |g 10 | ||
| author_variant |
j b jb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
bidondejuliamenesesechavezjosefbuschange:2020----:nloihpoieaiiiludneorprigeityeodadulse |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.63 44.69 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica (DE-627)ELV05213489X (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl Bidonde, Julia verfasserin aut An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews 2020transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial Elsevier Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. oth Busch, Angela J. oth Boden, Catherine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers 2017transfer abstract including pharmacoepidemiology reports Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV015597881 volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.63 Krankenpflege VZ 44.69 Intensivmedizin VZ AR 128 2020 130-139 10 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica (DE-627)ELV05213489X (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl Bidonde, Julia verfasserin aut An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews 2020transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial Elsevier Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. oth Busch, Angela J. oth Boden, Catherine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers 2017transfer abstract including pharmacoepidemiology reports Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV015597881 volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.63 Krankenpflege VZ 44.69 Intensivmedizin VZ AR 128 2020 130-139 10 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica (DE-627)ELV05213489X (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl Bidonde, Julia verfasserin aut An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews 2020transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial Elsevier Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. oth Busch, Angela J. oth Boden, Catherine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers 2017transfer abstract including pharmacoepidemiology reports Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV015597881 volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.63 Krankenpflege VZ 44.69 Intensivmedizin VZ AR 128 2020 130-139 10 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica (DE-627)ELV05213489X (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl Bidonde, Julia verfasserin aut An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews 2020transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial Elsevier Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. oth Busch, Angela J. oth Boden, Catherine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers 2017transfer abstract including pharmacoepidemiology reports Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV015597881 volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.63 Krankenpflege VZ 44.69 Intensivmedizin VZ AR 128 2020 130-139 10 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica (DE-627)ELV05213489X (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl Bidonde, Julia verfasserin aut An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews 2020transfer abstract 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial Elsevier Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. oth Busch, Angela J. oth Boden, Catherine oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers 2017transfer abstract including pharmacoepidemiology reports Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV015597881 volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.63 Krankenpflege VZ 44.69 Intensivmedizin VZ AR 128 2020 130-139 10 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:128 year:2020 pages:130-139 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Krankenpflege Intensivmedizin |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Clinical trial protocol Protocols Trial registry records Reporting guidance Systematic reviews as topic Clinical trials Randomized controlled trial |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bidonde, Julia @@aut@@ Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. @@oth@@ Busch, Angela J. @@oth@@ Boden, Catherine @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV015597881 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV05213489X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV05213489X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626032903.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV05213489X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.63</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.69</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bidonde, Julia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Clinical trial protocol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Protocols</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Trial registry records</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reporting guidance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Systematic reviews as topic</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Clinical trials</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Randomized controlled trial</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meneses-Echavez, Jose F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Busch, Angela J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boden, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers</subfield><subfield code="d">2017transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">including pharmacoepidemiology reports</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV015597881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:128</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:130-139</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.63</subfield><subfield code="j">Krankenpflege</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.69</subfield><subfield code="j">Intensivmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">128</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">130-139</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Bidonde, Julia |
| spellingShingle |
Bidonde, Julia ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 44.63 bkl 44.69 Elsevier Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| authorStr |
Bidonde, Julia |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV015597881 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 44.63 bkl 44.69 Elsevier Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 44.63 bkl 44.69 Elsevier Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 ddc 610 bkl 44.63 bkl 44.69 Elsevier Clinical trial protocol Elsevier Protocols Elsevier Trial registry records Elsevier Reporting guidance Elsevier Systematic reviews as topic Elsevier Clinical trials Elsevier Randomized controlled trial |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j f m e jfm jfme a j b aj ajb c b cb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV015597881 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV015597881 |
| title |
An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV05213489X (ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2 |
| title_full |
An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| author_sort |
Bidonde, Julia |
| journal |
Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers |
| journalStr |
Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
130 |
| author_browse |
Bidonde, Julia |
| container_volume |
128 |
| physical |
10 |
| class |
540 VZ 610 VZ 44.63 bkl 44.69 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Bidonde, Julia |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 |
| dewey-full |
540 610 |
| title_sort |
an algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| title_auth |
An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| abstract |
Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. |
| abstractGer |
Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. Busch, Angela J. Boden, Catherine |
| author2Str |
Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. Busch, Angela J. Boden, Catherine |
| ppnlink |
ELV015597881 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:11:44.566Z |
| _version_ |
1803869387036295168 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV05213489X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626032903.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001282.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV05213489X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0895-4356(20)31111-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.63</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.69</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bidonde, Julia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An algorithm provided as initial guidance for reporting registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: We aim to synthesize the available guidance with existing practices by Cochrane reviewers to generate an algorithm as a starting point in assisting reviewers reporting of registry records and published protocols (TRRs/PPs) use in systematic reviews of interventions. Study Design: We used existing guidance from major review bodies, assessed the current reporting of TRRs/PPs use in a sample of Cochrane reviews, and engaged in critical analysis. Independent reviewers identified and extracted textual excerpts reporting the use of trial registry records and published protocols and codes following a systematic review framework. Based on these elements, and our initial research, we created an algorithm/graphical aid to visualize initial direction. Results: We included 166 Cochrane systematic reviews published between August 2015 and 2016 from 48 review groups. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) varied between and within reviews. Reporting practices were diverse and inconsistent. Conclusions: This is a timely investigation in an era where evidence synthesis informs health and health care decisions. Our proposed algorithm provides initial direction to systematize the reporting of TRR/PP use. We hope that the algorithm generates further discussion to enhance the transparency of TRR/PP reporting and methodological research into the complexities of using protocols in systematic reviews of interventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Clinical trial protocol</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Protocols</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Trial registry records</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Reporting guidance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Systematic reviews as topic</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Clinical trials</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Randomized controlled trial</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meneses-Echavez, Jose F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Busch, Angela J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boden, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Chenzhe ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Influence of external loads on structure and photoactuation in densely crosslinked azo-incorporated liquid crystalline polymers</subfield><subfield code="d">2017transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">including pharmacoepidemiology reports</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV015597881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:128</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:130-139</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.025</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.63</subfield><subfield code="j">Krankenpflege</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.69</subfield><subfield code="j">Intensivmedizin</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">128</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">130-139</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000216 |