How do people choose among rational number notations?
• Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tian, Jing [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars - Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER, 2015, Amsterdam |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:123 ; year:2020 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV052231836 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV052231836 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230624182805.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV052231836 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 520 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 44.94 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tian, Jing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How do people choose among rational number notations? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a • Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Percentages |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Numerical cognition |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rational numbers |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fractions |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Decimals |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Braithwaite, David W. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Siegler, Robert S. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER |t Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars |d 2015 |g Amsterdam |w (DE-627)ELV01892736X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:123 |g year:2020 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.94 |j Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 123 |j 2020 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
j t jt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
tianjingbraithwaitedavidwsieglerroberts:2020----:odpolcosaogainlu |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| bklnumber |
44.94 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica (DE-627)ELV052231836 (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl Tian, Jing verfasserin aut How do people choose among rational number notations? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals Elsevier Braithwaite, David W. oth Siegler, Robert S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars 2015 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV01892736X volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 123 2020 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica (DE-627)ELV052231836 (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl Tian, Jing verfasserin aut How do people choose among rational number notations? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals Elsevier Braithwaite, David W. oth Siegler, Robert S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars 2015 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV01892736X volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 123 2020 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica (DE-627)ELV052231836 (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl Tian, Jing verfasserin aut How do people choose among rational number notations? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals Elsevier Braithwaite, David W. oth Siegler, Robert S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars 2015 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV01892736X volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 123 2020 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica (DE-627)ELV052231836 (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl Tian, Jing verfasserin aut How do people choose among rational number notations? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals Elsevier Braithwaite, David W. oth Siegler, Robert S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars 2015 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV01892736X volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 123 2020 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica (DE-627)ELV052231836 (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl Tian, Jing verfasserin aut How do people choose among rational number notations? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals Elsevier Braithwaite, David W. oth Siegler, Robert S. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars 2015 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV01892736X volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 123 2020 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars Amsterdam volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars Amsterdam volume:123 year:2020 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Percentages Numerical cognition Rational numbers Fractions Decimals |
| dewey-raw |
520 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tian, Jing @@aut@@ Braithwaite, David W. @@oth@@ Siegler, Robert S. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV01892736X |
| dewey-sort |
3520 |
| id |
ELV052231836 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV052231836</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230624182805.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV052231836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">520</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tian, Jing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How do people choose among rational number notations?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Percentages</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Numerical cognition</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rational numbers</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fractions</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Decimals</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Braithwaite, David W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Siegler, Robert S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV01892736X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:123</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="j">Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">123</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tian, Jing |
| spellingShingle |
Tian, Jing ddc 520 ddc 530 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 44.94 Elsevier Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals How do people choose among rational number notations? |
| authorStr |
Tian, Jing |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV01892736X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
520 - Astronomy & allied sciences 530 - Physics 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl How do people choose among rational number notations? Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 520 ddc 530 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 44.94 Elsevier Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 520 ddc 530 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 44.94 Elsevier Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals |
| topic_browse |
ddc 520 ddc 530 ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 44.94 Elsevier Percentages Elsevier Numerical cognition Elsevier Rational numbers Elsevier Fractions Elsevier Decimals |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
d w b dw dwb r s s rs rss |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV01892736X |
| dewey-tens |
520 - Astronomy 530 - Physics 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV01892736X |
| title |
How do people choose among rational number notations? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV052231836 (ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1 |
| title_full |
How do people choose among rational number notations? |
| author_sort |
Tian, Jing |
| journal |
Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars |
| journalStr |
Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Tian, Jing |
| container_volume |
123 |
| class |
520 VZ 530 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 44.94 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tian, Jing |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 |
| dewey-full |
520 530 570 |
| title_sort |
how do people choose among rational number notations? |
| title_auth |
How do people choose among rational number notations? |
| abstract |
• Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. |
| abstractGer |
• Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
• Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 |
| title_short |
How do people choose among rational number notations? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Braithwaite, David W. Siegler, Robert S. |
| author2Str |
Braithwaite, David W. Siegler, Robert S. |
| ppnlink |
ELV01892736X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:27:19.584Z |
| _version_ |
1803870367472680960 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV052231836</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230624182805.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001250.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV052231836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0010-0285(20)30062-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">520</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tian, Jing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How do people choose among rational number notations?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• Rational number notation preferences depend on the quantification strategy. • Fractions are preferred when the exact components of ratios can easily be enumerated. • Decimals and percentages are preferred when the ratios must be estimated. • Percentages are preferred to decimals in the absence of high precision requirements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Percentages</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Numerical cognition</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rational numbers</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fractions</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Decimals</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Braithwaite, David W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Siegler, Robert S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Ramsdale, J.D. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Ponding, draining and tilting of the Cerberus Plains; a cryolacustrine origin for the sinuous ridge and channel networks in Rahway Vallis, Mars</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV01892736X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:123</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101333</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="j">Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">123</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4018965 |