Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct
Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Chen, Fu-qiang [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience - Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER, 2015, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:107 ; year:2020 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV052253678 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV052253678 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626033028.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV052253678 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |a 670 |q VZ |
084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chen, Fu-qiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct |
264 | 1 | |c 2020transfer abstract | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. | ||
520 | |a Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Aerodynamic design |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Pressure drop |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Compressor L-inlet duct |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Total pressure loss coefficient |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Inlet distortion |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Xue-song |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hu, Bo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ren, Xiao-dong |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Zi-yuan |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gu, Chun-wei |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER |t Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience |d 2015 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV013466232 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:107 |g year:2020 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 107 |j 2020 |h 0 |
author_variant |
f q c fqc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
chenfuqianglixuesonghuborenxiaodongwangz:2020----:rsuerpnlssnardnmceinfo |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
51.00 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica (DE-627)ELV052253678 (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Chen, Fu-qiang verfasserin aut Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Elsevier Li, Xue-song oth Hu, Bo oth Ren, Xiao-dong oth Wang, Zi-yuan oth Gu, Chun-wei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013466232 volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 107 2020 0 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica (DE-627)ELV052253678 (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Chen, Fu-qiang verfasserin aut Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Elsevier Li, Xue-song oth Hu, Bo oth Ren, Xiao-dong oth Wang, Zi-yuan oth Gu, Chun-wei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013466232 volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 107 2020 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica (DE-627)ELV052253678 (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Chen, Fu-qiang verfasserin aut Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Elsevier Li, Xue-song oth Hu, Bo oth Ren, Xiao-dong oth Wang, Zi-yuan oth Gu, Chun-wei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013466232 volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 107 2020 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica (DE-627)ELV052253678 (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Chen, Fu-qiang verfasserin aut Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Elsevier Li, Xue-song oth Hu, Bo oth Ren, Xiao-dong oth Wang, Zi-yuan oth Gu, Chun-wei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013466232 volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 107 2020 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica (DE-627)ELV052253678 (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Chen, Fu-qiang verfasserin aut Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct 2020transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Elsevier Li, Xue-song oth Hu, Bo oth Ren, Xiao-dong oth Wang, Zi-yuan oth Gu, Chun-wei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV013466232 volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_40 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 107 2020 0 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:107 year:2020 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Aerodynamic design Pressure drop Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Compressor L-inlet duct Total pressure loss coefficient Inlet distortion |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Chen, Fu-qiang @@aut@@ Li, Xue-song @@oth@@ Hu, Bo @@oth@@ Ren, Xiao-dong @@oth@@ Wang, Zi-yuan @@oth@@ Gu, Chun-wei @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV013466232 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
ELV052253678 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV052253678</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626033028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV052253678</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Fu-qiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aerodynamic design</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pressure drop</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Compressor L-inlet duct</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Total pressure loss coefficient</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inlet distortion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xue-song</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Bo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ren, Xiao-dong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Zi-yuan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Chun-wei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013466232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:107</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">107</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Chen, Fu-qiang |
spellingShingle |
Chen, Fu-qiang ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct |
authorStr |
Chen, Fu-qiang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV013466232 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 600 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Aerodynamic design Elsevier Pressure drop Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Elsevier Compressor L-inlet duct Elsevier Total pressure loss coefficient Elsevier Inlet distortion |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
x s l xsl b h bh x d r xdr z y w zyw c w g cwg |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV013466232 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV013466232 |
title |
Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV052253678 (ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3 |
title_full |
Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct |
author_sort |
Chen, Fu-qiang |
journal |
Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience |
journalStr |
Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Chen, Fu-qiang |
container_volume |
107 |
class |
610 VZ 600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Chen, Fu-qiang |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 |
dewey-full |
610 600 670 |
title_sort |
pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor l-inlet duct |
title_auth |
Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct |
abstract |
Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. |
abstractGer |
Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_40 |
title_short |
Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Li, Xue-song Hu, Bo Ren, Xiao-dong Wang, Zi-yuan Gu, Chun-wei |
author2Str |
Li, Xue-song Hu, Bo Ren, Xiao-dong Wang, Zi-yuan Gu, Chun-wei |
ppnlink |
ELV013466232 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T22:30:57.014Z |
_version_ |
1803870595465609216 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV052253678</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626033028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001220.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV052253678</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1270-9638(20)31006-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Fu-qiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pressure drop analysis and aerodynamic design of compressor L-inlet duct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure drop inside the compressor L-inlet duct (CLID) has a great impact on the intake loss, which directly affects the operating cost of the power plant. Generally, every 500 Pa inlet pressure drop is equivalent to 0.5% intake loss at standard conditions, which can contribute to higher than 1% of gas turbine power loss in terms of fuel flow. Hence, the pressure drop should be kept as low as possible. Pressure drop that occurs within the CLID mainly depends on the structural parameters, however, no general design guidelines were found in open literature. Moreover, a reasonable intake duct aerodynamic design is the fundamental solution to the problem of compressor inlet distortion. Therefore, in this paper, the fluid dynamics of CLID are revealed by using both the experimental and numerical methods. Then, the effects of typical parameters on the pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient are investigated. Furthermore, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed on the basis of distortion flow analysis and 1D intake volute design. The results show that larger CLID width (a/ D 4 ) and depth (b/ D 4 ) result in larger flow separation at the contraction, thereby leading to smaller total pressure drop and total pressure loss coefficient. However, the opposite change occurs at the cone diameter ( D 0 / D 4 ). Besides, the conceptual design of CLID is proposed by indirectly establishing the relationship between the outlet flow angle and inlet structural parameters.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aerodynamic design</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pressure drop</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Compressor L-inlet duct</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Total pressure loss coefficient</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inlet distortion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xue-song</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Bo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ren, Xiao-dong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Zi-yuan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Chun-wei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Baysal, Birol ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Mo1474 The Role of EUS Examination and EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Evaluation of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: a Large Single Center Experience</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV013466232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:107</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106324</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">107</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4022045 |