Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry
High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first eval...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Huang, Xueyan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method - Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER, 2013, the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems, New York, NY [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:489 ; year:2021 ; day:31 ; month:03 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV053044347 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV053044347 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626034130.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV053044347 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 50.92 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Huang, Xueyan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. | ||
| 520 | |a High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Lithium sulfur pouch cell |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Thermal runaway |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EV-ARC |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Safety |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a State of charge |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xiao, Min |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Han, Dongmei |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xue, Jianjun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Shuanjin |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meng, Yuezhong |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER |t Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method |d 2013 |d the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV00098745X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:489 |g year:2021 |g day:31 |g month:03 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 50.92 |j Meerestechnik |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 489 |j 2021 |b 31 |c 0331 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
x h xh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
huangxueyanxiaominhandongmeixuejianjunwa:2021----:hrarnwyetrsfihuslupuhelavrosttsfhrevlaebetnev |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
50.92 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica (DE-627)ELV053044347 (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 50.92 bkl Huang, Xueyan verfasserin aut Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Elsevier Xiao, Min oth Han, Dongmei oth Xue, Jianjun oth Wang, Shuanjin oth Meng, Yuezhong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method 2013 the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00098745X volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 50.92 Meerestechnik VZ AR 489 2021 31 0331 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica (DE-627)ELV053044347 (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 50.92 bkl Huang, Xueyan verfasserin aut Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Elsevier Xiao, Min oth Han, Dongmei oth Xue, Jianjun oth Wang, Shuanjin oth Meng, Yuezhong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method 2013 the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00098745X volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 50.92 Meerestechnik VZ AR 489 2021 31 0331 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica (DE-627)ELV053044347 (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 50.92 bkl Huang, Xueyan verfasserin aut Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Elsevier Xiao, Min oth Han, Dongmei oth Xue, Jianjun oth Wang, Shuanjin oth Meng, Yuezhong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method 2013 the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00098745X volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 50.92 Meerestechnik VZ AR 489 2021 31 0331 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica (DE-627)ELV053044347 (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 50.92 bkl Huang, Xueyan verfasserin aut Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Elsevier Xiao, Min oth Han, Dongmei oth Xue, Jianjun oth Wang, Shuanjin oth Meng, Yuezhong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method 2013 the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00098745X volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 50.92 Meerestechnik VZ AR 489 2021 31 0331 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica (DE-627)ELV053044347 (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 50.92 bkl Huang, Xueyan verfasserin aut Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Elsevier Xiao, Min oth Han, Dongmei oth Xue, Jianjun oth Wang, Shuanjin oth Meng, Yuezhong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method 2013 the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00098745X volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 50.92 Meerestechnik VZ AR 489 2021 31 0331 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method New York, NY [u.a.] volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method New York, NY [u.a.] volume:489 year:2021 day:31 month:03 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Meerestechnik |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Lithium sulfur pouch cell Thermal runaway EV-ARC Safety State of charge |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Huang, Xueyan @@aut@@ Xiao, Min @@oth@@ Han, Dongmei @@oth@@ Xue, Jianjun @@oth@@ Wang, Shuanjin @@oth@@ Meng, Yuezhong @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-31T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV00098745X |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
ELV053044347 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053044347</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034130.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053044347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.92</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Xueyan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lithium sulfur pouch cell</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermal runaway</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EV-ARC</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Safety</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">State of charge</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao, Min</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Han, Dongmei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xue, Jianjun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Shuanjin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meng, Yuezhong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00098745X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:489</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">day:31</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.92</subfield><subfield code="j">Meerestechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">489</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="b">31</subfield><subfield code="c">0331</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Huang, Xueyan |
| spellingShingle |
Huang, Xueyan ddc 690 bkl 50.92 Elsevier Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| authorStr |
Huang, Xueyan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV00098745X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
690 VZ 50.92 bkl Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 690 bkl 50.92 Elsevier Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 50.92 Elsevier Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 50.92 Elsevier Lithium sulfur pouch cell Elsevier Thermal runaway Elsevier EV-ARC Elsevier Safety Elsevier State of charge |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m x mx d h dh j x jx s w sw y m ym |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV00098745X |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV00098745X |
| title |
Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV053044347 (ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5 |
| title_full |
Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| author_sort |
Huang, Xueyan |
| journal |
Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method |
| journalStr |
Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Huang, Xueyan |
| container_volume |
489 |
| class |
690 VZ 50.92 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Huang, Xueyan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 |
| dewey-full |
690 |
| title_sort |
thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| title_auth |
Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| abstract |
High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. |
| abstractGer |
High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Xiao, Min Han, Dongmei Xue, Jianjun Wang, Shuanjin Meng, Yuezhong |
| author2Str |
Xiao, Min Han, Dongmei Xue, Jianjun Wang, Shuanjin Meng, Yuezhong |
| ppnlink |
ELV00098745X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:51:20.312Z |
| _version_ |
1803853003817484288 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053044347</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034130.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001339.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053044347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-7753(21)00052-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.92</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Xueyan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">High energy density lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are regarded as the promising next-generation energy stroge devices. The thermal runaway (TR) issues posed by Li–S batteries have been less investigated, while they are critical for the practical application of Li–S batteries. Herein, we first evaluate the TR features of the 1.5 Ah Li–S pouch cell (LSPC) at various states of charge (SOC) using extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC). The specific heat capacity and thermodynamic parameters have been calculated from the recorded data. An intermittent pulse technique has been used to quantify the internal resistance of LSPC during the EV-ARC test. The heat sources in the TR processes of LSPC composed of different chemistries have been probed using EV-ARC and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Moreover, it takes as long as 15.7 min for LSPC with 100% SOC from the sharp drop of voltage to the instantaneous rise of temperature, while it takes 16 s for lithium ion pouch cell (LIPC). The experiment results indicate that the major heat source during TR may not be the internal short circuit but the redox reaction between cathode and anode, which can provide an important insight into the rational design of safe Li–S battery system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lithium sulfur pouch cell</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermal runaway</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EV-ARC</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Safety</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">State of charge</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao, Min</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Han, Dongmei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xue, Jianjun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Shuanjin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meng, Yuezhong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xiao, Hong ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Numerical modeling of wave–current forces acting on horizontal cylinder of marine structures by VOF method</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal on the science and technology of electrochemical energy systems</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00098745X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:489</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">day:31</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.92</subfield><subfield code="j">Meerestechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">489</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="b">31</subfield><subfield code="c">0331</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3991003 |