The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving
In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tang, Tanya Ya [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals - Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER, 2022, JBR, New York, NY |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:126 ; year:2021 ; pages:88-98 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV05313009X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV05313009X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626034301.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV05313009X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tang, Tanya Ya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. | ||
| 520 | |a In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Market-driving |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Firm value |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Market dynamism |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Marketing innovation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Market-driven |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Shaoling Katee |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peng, Jianping |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER |t RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |d 2022 |d JBR |g New York, NY |w (DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:126 |g year:2021 |g pages:88-98 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 126 |j 2021 |h 88-98 |g 11 | ||
| author_variant |
t y t ty tyt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
tangtanyayazhangshaolingkateepengjianpin:2021----:hvlefaktninvtomredievr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
51.00 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica (DE-627)ELV05313009X (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Tang, Tanya Ya verfasserin aut The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving 2021transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven Elsevier Zhang, Shaoling Katee oth Peng, Jianping oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 126 2021 88-98 11 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica (DE-627)ELV05313009X (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Tang, Tanya Ya verfasserin aut The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving 2021transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven Elsevier Zhang, Shaoling Katee oth Peng, Jianping oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 126 2021 88-98 11 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica (DE-627)ELV05313009X (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Tang, Tanya Ya verfasserin aut The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving 2021transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven Elsevier Zhang, Shaoling Katee oth Peng, Jianping oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 126 2021 88-98 11 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica (DE-627)ELV05313009X (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Tang, Tanya Ya verfasserin aut The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving 2021transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven Elsevier Zhang, Shaoling Katee oth Peng, Jianping oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 126 2021 88-98 11 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica (DE-627)ELV05313009X (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Tang, Tanya Ya verfasserin aut The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving 2021transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven Elsevier Zhang, Shaoling Katee oth Peng, Jianping oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 126 2021 88-98 11 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals New York, NY volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals New York, NY volume:126 year:2021 pages:88-98 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Market-driving Firm value Market dynamism Marketing innovation Market-driven |
| dewey-raw |
670 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tang, Tanya Ya @@aut@@ Zhang, Shaoling Katee @@oth@@ Peng, Jianping @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008600120 |
| dewey-sort |
3670 |
| id |
ELV05313009X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV05313009X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV05313009X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tang, Tanya Ya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Market-driving</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Firm value</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Market dynamism</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Marketing innovation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Market-driven</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Shaoling Katee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peng, Jianping</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">JBR</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008600120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:126</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:88-98</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">126</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">88-98</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tang, Tanya Ya |
| spellingShingle |
Tang, Tanya Ya ddc 670 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving |
| authorStr |
Tang, Tanya Ya |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
670 VZ 51.00 bkl The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 670 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven |
| topic_browse |
ddc 670 bkl 51.00 Elsevier Market-driving Elsevier Firm value Elsevier Market dynamism Elsevier Marketing innovation Elsevier Market-driven |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s k z sk skz j p jp |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008600120 |
| dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| title |
The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV05313009X (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3 |
| title_full |
The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving |
| author_sort |
Tang, Tanya Ya |
| journal |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| journalStr |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
88 |
| author_browse |
Tang, Tanya Ya |
| container_volume |
126 |
| physical |
11 |
| class |
670 VZ 51.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tang, Tanya Ya |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 |
| dewey-full |
670 |
| title_sort |
value of marketing innovation: market-driven versus market-driving |
| title_auth |
The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving |
| abstract |
In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. |
| abstractGer |
In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Zhang, Shaoling Katee Peng, Jianping |
| author2Str |
Zhang, Shaoling Katee Peng, Jianping |
| ppnlink |
ELV008600120 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:05:35.515Z |
| _version_ |
1803853900562825216 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV05313009X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001365.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV05313009X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(20)30897-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tang, Tanya Ya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The value of marketing innovation: Market-driven versus market-driving</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, significant managerial attention has been paid to marketing innovation; however, the academic literature has remained silent on the value of marketing innovation and often assumes that it is too trivial and tactical to create a substantial impact on firm value. This study attempts to address the research gaps by answering two research questions: (1) Does marketing innovation increase firm value? and (2) if yes, how does marketing innovation add value to firms? Building upon market orientation theory and the marketing-finance interface literature, we classify two types of marketing innovation—market-driven and market-driving—and assess their impact on firm value through the mediating effects of cash flow drivers and investigate how such an impact is influenced by the three market forces—demand uncertainty, technological turbulence, and competitive intensity. With a large panel dataset consisting of 4772 new products in the consumer-packaged-goods (CPG) industries from 1985 to 2010, our study reveals that market-driving marketing innovation, which is associated with the effectiveness of firm value creation, contributes six-fold more to firm value than market-driven marketing innovation, which is associated with the efficiency of firm value creation. This study also reveals the differential moderating effects of the three market forces: when an industry faces high demand uncertainty, both types of marketing innovation strengthen their positive impact on firm value; in an industry marked by technological turbulence, only market-driving marketing innovation increases firm value; but, in an intensely competitive industry, only market-driven marketing innovation increases firm value.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Market-driving</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Firm value</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Market dynamism</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Marketing innovation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Market-driven</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Shaoling Katee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peng, Jianping</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">JBR</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008600120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:126</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:88-98</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.067</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">126</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">88-98</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399932 |