Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic
The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Maeda, Kei [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
4 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration - Rey, F. ELSEVIER, 2018, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:47 ; year:2021 ; number:6 ; day:15 ; month:03 ; pages:8728-8731 ; extent:4 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV053185358 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV053185358 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626034405.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV053185358 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 43.12 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 43.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 44.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Maeda, Kei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 4 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. | ||
| 520 | |a The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Crystallization |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Glass-ceramics |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Flaw |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Indentation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Strength |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Akatsuka, Kosho |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yasumori, Atsuo |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Rey, F. ELSEVIER |t Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration |d 2018 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000899798 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:15 |g month:03 |g pages:8728-8731 |g extent:4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 43.12 |j Umweltchemie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 43.13 |j Umwelttoxikologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.13 |j Medizinische Ökologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 47 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 15 |c 0315 |h 8728-8731 |g 4 | ||
| author_variant |
k m km |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
maedakeiakatsukakoshoyasumoriatsuo:2021----:rciasrntodmgrssataa23 |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
43.12 43.13 44.13 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica (DE-627)ELV053185358 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Maeda, Kei verfasserin aut Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic 2021transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Elsevier Akatsuka, Kosho oth Yasumori, Atsuo oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rey, F. ELSEVIER Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000899798 volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 47 2021 6 15 0315 8728-8731 4 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica (DE-627)ELV053185358 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Maeda, Kei verfasserin aut Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic 2021transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Elsevier Akatsuka, Kosho oth Yasumori, Atsuo oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rey, F. ELSEVIER Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000899798 volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 47 2021 6 15 0315 8728-8731 4 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica (DE-627)ELV053185358 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Maeda, Kei verfasserin aut Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic 2021transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Elsevier Akatsuka, Kosho oth Yasumori, Atsuo oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rey, F. ELSEVIER Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000899798 volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 47 2021 6 15 0315 8728-8731 4 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica (DE-627)ELV053185358 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Maeda, Kei verfasserin aut Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic 2021transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Elsevier Akatsuka, Kosho oth Yasumori, Atsuo oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rey, F. ELSEVIER Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000899798 volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 47 2021 6 15 0315 8728-8731 4 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica (DE-627)ELV053185358 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Maeda, Kei verfasserin aut Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic 2021transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Elsevier Akatsuka, Kosho oth Yasumori, Atsuo oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rey, F. ELSEVIER Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration 2018 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000899798 volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO 43.12 Umweltchemie VZ 43.13 Umwelttoxikologie VZ 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie VZ AR 47 2021 6 15 0315 8728-8731 4 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:47 year:2021 number:6 day:15 month:03 pages:8728-8731 extent:4 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Umweltchemie Umwelttoxikologie Medizinische Ökologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Crystallization Glass-ceramics Flaw Indentation Strength |
| dewey-raw |
333.7 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Maeda, Kei @@aut@@ Akatsuka, Kosho @@oth@@ Yasumori, Atsuo @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000899798 |
| dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
| id |
ELV053185358 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053185358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034405.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053185358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maeda, Kei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Crystallization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Glass-ceramics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Flaw</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indentation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strength</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akatsuka, Kosho</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yasumori, Atsuo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rey, F. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000899798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8728-8731</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttoxikologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0315</subfield><subfield code="h">8728-8731</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Maeda, Kei |
| spellingShingle |
Maeda, Kei ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic |
| authorStr |
Maeda, Kei |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000899798 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength |
| topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 bkl 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 Elsevier Crystallization Elsevier Glass-ceramics Elsevier Flaw Elsevier Indentation Elsevier Strength |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k a ka a y ay |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000899798 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000899798 |
| title |
Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV053185358 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9 |
| title_full |
Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic |
| author_sort |
Maeda, Kei |
| journal |
Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration |
| journalStr |
Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
8728 |
| author_browse |
Maeda, Kei |
| container_volume |
47 |
| physical |
4 |
| class |
333.7 610 VZ 43.12 bkl 43.13 bkl 44.13 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Maeda, Kei |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 |
| dewey-full |
333.7 610 |
| title_sort |
practical strength of damage-resistant cao–al2o3–sio2 glass-ceramic |
| title_auth |
Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic |
| abstract |
The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. |
| abstractGer |
The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Akatsuka, Kosho Yasumori, Atsuo |
| author2Str |
Akatsuka, Kosho Yasumori, Atsuo |
| ppnlink |
ELV000899798 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:14:52.735Z |
| _version_ |
1803854484851392512 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053185358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034405.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001677.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053185358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(20)33571-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maeda, Kei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Practical strength of damage-resistant CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The strength of glass depends on the size of flaws existing on its surface. Therefore, its strength considerably deteriorates once a large flaw is generated upon contact with harder materials. Such mechanical failure renders the glass unreliable, which can cause severe problems in practice. In this work, the damage resistance of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 (CAS) glass-ceramic (GC) was evaluated through bending tests. The test was conducted using abraded samples with conventional soda–lime–silica (SLS) glass as a reference. Although the strength of the SLS glass decreased to less than 50 MPa after abrasion, CAS-GC maintained an average strength of 100 MPa with a higher Weibull distribution number. Large sharp flaws, which act as a stress concentrator, were not observed in CAS-GC. This observation was consistent with the microcrack formation instead of the radial crack around Vickers indentation in CAS-GC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Crystallization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Glass-ceramics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Flaw</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indentation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strength</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akatsuka, Kosho</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yasumori, Atsuo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rey, F. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000899798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8728-8731</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.236</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttoxikologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0315</subfield><subfield code="h">8728-8731</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399768 |