Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing
Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Zhao, Pengjun [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Land use policy - Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER, 2021, the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:103 ; year:2021 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV053242424 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV053242424 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626034502.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV053242424 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |a 640 |a 610 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhao, Pengjun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. | ||
| 520 | |a Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Urban fringe |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Urban-rural integration |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Travel burden |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Transport disadvantage |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Land use |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wan, Jie |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER |t Land use policy |d 2021 |d the international journal covering all aspects of land use |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV006296785 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:103 |g year:2021 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 103 |j 2021 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
p z pz |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
zhaopengjunwanjie:2021----:adsadrvludnfeietiubnrnenrrlraaeautooubnuai |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica (DE-627)ELV053242424 (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 610 VZ Zhao, Pengjun verfasserin aut Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Elsevier Wan, Jie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER Land use policy 2021 the international journal covering all aspects of land use Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006296785 volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 103 2021 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica (DE-627)ELV053242424 (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 610 VZ Zhao, Pengjun verfasserin aut Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Elsevier Wan, Jie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER Land use policy 2021 the international journal covering all aspects of land use Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006296785 volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 103 2021 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica (DE-627)ELV053242424 (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 610 VZ Zhao, Pengjun verfasserin aut Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Elsevier Wan, Jie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER Land use policy 2021 the international journal covering all aspects of land use Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006296785 volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 103 2021 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica (DE-627)ELV053242424 (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 610 VZ Zhao, Pengjun verfasserin aut Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Elsevier Wan, Jie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER Land use policy 2021 the international journal covering all aspects of land use Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006296785 volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 103 2021 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica (DE-627)ELV053242424 (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 610 VZ Zhao, Pengjun verfasserin aut Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Elsevier Wan, Jie oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER Land use policy 2021 the international journal covering all aspects of land use Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006296785 volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 103 2021 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Land use policy Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Land use policy Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:103 year:2021 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Urban fringe Urban-rural integration Travel burden Transport disadvantage Land use |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Land use policy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zhao, Pengjun @@aut@@ Wan, Jie @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV006296785 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
ELV053242424 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053242424</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053242424</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Pengjun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urban fringe</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urban-rural integration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Travel burden</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Transport disadvantage</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Land use</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wan, Jie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Land use policy</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal covering all aspects of land use</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006296785</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:103</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">103</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Zhao, Pengjun |
| spellingShingle |
Zhao, Pengjun ddc 630 Elsevier Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing |
| authorStr |
Zhao, Pengjun |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV006296785 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
630 640 610 VZ Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 630 Elsevier Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 Elsevier Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 Elsevier Urban fringe Elsevier Urban-rural integration Elsevier Travel burden Elsevier Transport disadvantage Elsevier Land use |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j w jw |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Land use policy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV006296785 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Land use policy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV006296785 |
| title |
Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV053242424 (ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6 |
| title_full |
Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing |
| author_sort |
Zhao, Pengjun |
| journal |
Land use policy |
| journalStr |
Land use policy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Zhao, Pengjun |
| container_volume |
103 |
| class |
630 640 610 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Zhao, Pengjun |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 610 |
| title_sort |
land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: an evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in beijing |
| title_auth |
Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing |
| abstract |
Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. |
| abstractGer |
Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wan, Jie |
| author2Str |
Wan, Jie |
| ppnlink |
ELV006296785 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:24:25.077Z |
| _version_ |
1803855084994428928 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053242424</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001381.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053242424</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0264-8377(21)00032-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Pengjun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is a vital issue in relation to sustainable land use in large cities. Urban-rural integration initiatives have been addressed in China’s land use planning in order to reduce the gap in the quality of life between the urban and rural population. This paper aims to examine urban-rural integration initiatives from the perspective of travel burden in the urban fringe and rural areas by looking at Beijing as a case study. By analysing the data from 76,761 questionnaires, residents’ travel burden in the urban, urban fringe and surrounding rural areas is compared quantitatively, and land use characteristics leading to the difference of travel burden are discussed by regression. The results show that there are significant differences in travel burden among residents living in different areas. Travel time and cost in the urban fringe areas are significantly higher than both the urban and rural areas. Fewer employment opportunities and lack of public service facilities in urban fringe areas are the main factors in this difference. In addition, those who live in the urban fringe have a higher proportion of car ownership than urban residents. Thus, there may be a phenomenon of “forced car ownership” among urban fringe residents, as low accessibility to jobs and public services (including public transit services) necessitates owning a car. It seems that the current urban-rural integration initiatives play a limited role in promoting accessibility to the job market and public facilities in the urban fringe. Stronger land use policies are needed to enhance the quality of life in the urban fringe within the context of rapid urban sprawl in China’s cities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urban fringe</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urban-rural integration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Travel burden</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Transport disadvantage</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Land use</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wan, Jie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Son, Yang-Ju ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Land use policy</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal covering all aspects of land use</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006296785</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:103</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105309</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">103</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4021244 |