Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction
The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-const...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tantucci, Vittorio [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
18 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: 83-P - 2012transfer abstract, an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies, New York, NY [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:175 ; year:2021 ; pages:94-111 ; extent:18 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV053333225 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV053333225 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626034646.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV053333225 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tantucci, Vittorio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 18 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. | ||
| 520 | |a The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Corpus-based |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Disagreement |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Priming |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Resonance |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Mandarin |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Intersubjectivity |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Aiqing |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |t 83-P |d 2012transfer abstract |d an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV016157710 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:175 |g year:2021 |g pages:94-111 |g extent:18 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_72 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_77 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_121 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_131 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_172 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_183 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_184 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_191 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_216 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_754 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_1012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 175 |j 2021 |h 94-111 |g 18 | ||
| author_variant |
v t vt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
tantuccivittoriowangaiqing:2021----:eoacadnaeethogdsgemneiecopritncntutoapiigrm |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica (DE-627)ELV053333225 (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Tantucci, Vittorio verfasserin aut Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction 2021transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Elsevier Wang, Aiqing oth Enthalten in Elsevier 83-P 2012transfer abstract an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016157710 volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_147 GBV_ILN_172 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_191 GBV_ILN_216 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_1012 AR 175 2021 94-111 18 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica (DE-627)ELV053333225 (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Tantucci, Vittorio verfasserin aut Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction 2021transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Elsevier Wang, Aiqing oth Enthalten in Elsevier 83-P 2012transfer abstract an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016157710 volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_147 GBV_ILN_172 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_191 GBV_ILN_216 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_1012 AR 175 2021 94-111 18 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica (DE-627)ELV053333225 (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Tantucci, Vittorio verfasserin aut Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction 2021transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Elsevier Wang, Aiqing oth Enthalten in Elsevier 83-P 2012transfer abstract an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016157710 volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_147 GBV_ILN_172 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_191 GBV_ILN_216 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_1012 AR 175 2021 94-111 18 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica (DE-627)ELV053333225 (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Tantucci, Vittorio verfasserin aut Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction 2021transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Elsevier Wang, Aiqing oth Enthalten in Elsevier 83-P 2012transfer abstract an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016157710 volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_147 GBV_ILN_172 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_191 GBV_ILN_216 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_1012 AR 175 2021 94-111 18 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica (DE-627)ELV053333225 (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Tantucci, Vittorio verfasserin aut Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction 2021transfer abstract 18 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Elsevier Wang, Aiqing oth Enthalten in Elsevier 83-P 2012transfer abstract an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV016157710 volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_147 GBV_ILN_172 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_191 GBV_ILN_216 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_1012 AR 175 2021 94-111 18 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in 83-P New York, NY [u.a.] volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in 83-P New York, NY [u.a.] volume:175 year:2021 pages:94-111 extent:18 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Corpus-based Disagreement Priming Resonance Mandarin Intersubjectivity |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
83-P |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tantucci, Vittorio @@aut@@ Wang, Aiqing @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV016157710 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV053333225 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053333225</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034646.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053333225</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tantucci, Vittorio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Corpus-based</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Disagreement</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Priming</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Resonance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mandarin</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intersubjectivity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Aiqing</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">83-P</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016157710</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:175</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:94-111</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_191</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_1012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">175</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">94-111</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tantucci, Vittorio |
| spellingShingle |
Tantucci, Vittorio ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| authorStr |
Tantucci, Vittorio |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV016157710 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier Corpus-based Elsevier Disagreement Elsevier Priming Elsevier Resonance Elsevier Mandarin Elsevier Intersubjectivity |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
a w aw |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
83-P |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV016157710 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
83-P |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV016157710 |
| title |
Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV053333225 (ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3 |
| title_full |
Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| author_sort |
Tantucci, Vittorio |
| journal |
83-P |
| journalStr |
83-P |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
94 |
| author_browse |
Tantucci, Vittorio |
| container_volume |
175 |
| physical |
18 |
| class |
610 VZ 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tantucci, Vittorio |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 |
| dewey-full |
610 570 |
| title_sort |
resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: evidence of persistent constructional priming from mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| title_auth |
Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| abstract |
The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. |
| abstractGer |
The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_77 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_147 GBV_ILN_172 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_191 GBV_ILN_216 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_1012 |
| title_short |
Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wang, Aiqing |
| author2Str |
Wang, Aiqing |
| ppnlink |
ELV016157710 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:39:45.376Z |
| _version_ |
1803856049998921728 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053333225</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626034646.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001529.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053333225</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-2166(21)00002-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tantucci, Vittorio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The recent cognitive and pragmatic turn towards a dialogic syntax (cf. Du Bois, 2014; Tantucci et al., 2018) emphasises the important role played by resonance as catalytic activation of affinities across turns at talk (Du Bois and Giora, 2014). Resonance occurs when interlocutors creatively co-construct utterances that are formally and phonetically similar to the utterance of a prior speaker. This study draws on naturalistic data from the Mandarin Callhome corpus of telephone conversations (McEnery and Xiao, 2008) and focuses on the way resonance intersects with 1000 speech acts of (dis-)agreement. From a mixed effects linear regression model (Baayen and Davidson, 2008) emerged a persistent mechanism of constructional priming in the form of both formal and functional similarity across turn-takings, intersecting with both speech acts of agreement and disagreement. Our results reveal that, contrary to what is often assumed in the literature (e.g. Bock, 1986; Bock et al., 2007), priming does not occur as a merely implicit mechanism, but significantly correlates with increase of explicit engagement, creativity and sentence peripheral pragmatic marking of intersubjectivity (Tantucci, 2020; 2021). The results of this case-study ultimately suggest that structural similarity in naturalistic interaction occurs as a by-product of interactional engagement and creativity, underpinning ad hoc formation of constructional pairings of form and meaning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Corpus-based</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Disagreement</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Priming</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Resonance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mandarin</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intersubjectivity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Aiqing</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="t">83-P</subfield><subfield code="d">2012transfer abstract</subfield><subfield code="d">an interdisciplinary monthly of language studies</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV016157710</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:175</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:94-111</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_191</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_1012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">175</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">94-111</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4008865 |