Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Maki, Kristin G. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa - Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER, 2017, an international journal devoted to practice and theory, Amsterdam |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:147 ; year:2021 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV053820940 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV053820940 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626035357.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV053820940 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.91 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Maki, Kristin G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. | ||
| 520 | |a Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Shete, Sanjay |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Volk, Robert J. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER |t Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa |d 2017 |d an international journal devoted to practice and theory |g Amsterdam |w (DE-627)ELV000729329 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:147 |g year:2021 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.91 |j Psychiatrie |j Psychopathologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 147 |j 2021 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
k g m kg kgm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
makikristingshetesanjayvolkrobertj:2021----:xmnnlncnesreigtlztowtpbiueaapo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.91 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica (DE-627)ELV053820940 (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Maki, Kristin G. verfasserin aut Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Shete, Sanjay oth Volk, Robert J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa 2017 an international journal devoted to practice and theory Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000729329 volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 147 2021 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica (DE-627)ELV053820940 (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Maki, Kristin G. verfasserin aut Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Shete, Sanjay oth Volk, Robert J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa 2017 an international journal devoted to practice and theory Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000729329 volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 147 2021 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica (DE-627)ELV053820940 (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Maki, Kristin G. verfasserin aut Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Shete, Sanjay oth Volk, Robert J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa 2017 an international journal devoted to practice and theory Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000729329 volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 147 2021 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica (DE-627)ELV053820940 (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Maki, Kristin G. verfasserin aut Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Shete, Sanjay oth Volk, Robert J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa 2017 an international journal devoted to practice and theory Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000729329 volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 147 2021 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica (DE-627)ELV053820940 (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Maki, Kristin G. verfasserin aut Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. Shete, Sanjay oth Volk, Robert J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa 2017 an international journal devoted to practice and theory Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000729329 volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 147 2021 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa Amsterdam volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa Amsterdam volume:147 year:2021 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Psychiatrie Psychopathologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Maki, Kristin G. @@aut@@ Shete, Sanjay @@oth@@ Volk, Robert J. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000729329 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV053820940 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053820940</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626035357.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053820940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maki, Kristin G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shete, Sanjay</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Volk, Robert J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal devoted to practice and theory</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000729329</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:147</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychiatrie</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychopathologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">147</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Maki, Kristin G. |
| spellingShingle |
Maki, Kristin G. ddc 610 bkl 44.91 Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| authorStr |
Maki, Kristin G. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000729329 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 44.91 bkl Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.91 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.91 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.91 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s s ss r j v rj rjv |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000729329 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000729329 |
| title |
Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV053820940 (ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6 |
| title_full |
Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| author_sort |
Maki, Kristin G. |
| journal |
Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa |
| journalStr |
Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Maki, Kristin G. |
| container_volume |
147 |
| class |
610 VZ 44.91 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Maki, Kristin G. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: opportunities and challenges |
| title_auth |
Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| abstract |
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. |
| abstractGer |
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Shete, Sanjay Volk, Robert J. |
| author2Str |
Shete, Sanjay Volk, Robert J. |
| ppnlink |
ELV000729329 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:00:54.676Z |
| _version_ |
1803861155830038528 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV053820940</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626035357.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001374.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV053820940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0091-7435(21)00087-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maki, Kristin G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shete, Sanjay</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Volk, Robert J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Hamatani, Sayo ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Impaired central coherence in patients with anorexia nervosa</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal devoted to practice and theory</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000729329</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:147</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106503</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychiatrie</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychopathologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">147</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401535 |