A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation
A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradia...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Stanek, Bartosz [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
19 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Technologies and practice of CO - HU, Yongle ELSEVIER, 2019, an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:174 ; year:2021 ; pages:635-653 ; extent:19 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV054098580 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV054098580 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626035659.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV054098580 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stanek, Bartosz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 19 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. | ||
| 520 | |a A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Solar hybrid collectors |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Solar energy |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CPV |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Parabolic trough collectors |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PTC |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bartela, Łukasz |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Węcel, Daniel |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Uchman, Wojciech |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a HU, Yongle ELSEVIER |t Technologies and practice of CO |d 2019 |d an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:174 |g year:2021 |g pages:635-653 |g extent:19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 174 |j 2021 |h 635-653 |g 19 | ||
| author_variant |
b s bs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
stanekbartoszgrzywnowiczkrzysztofbartela:2021----:sseaayiohbislrtcvb |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica (DE-627)ELV054098580 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Stanek, Bartosz verfasserin aut A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation 2021transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC Elsevier Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof oth Bartela, Łukasz oth Węcel, Daniel oth Uchman, Wojciech oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 174 2021 635-653 19 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica (DE-627)ELV054098580 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Stanek, Bartosz verfasserin aut A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation 2021transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC Elsevier Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof oth Bartela, Łukasz oth Węcel, Daniel oth Uchman, Wojciech oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 174 2021 635-653 19 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica (DE-627)ELV054098580 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Stanek, Bartosz verfasserin aut A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation 2021transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC Elsevier Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof oth Bartela, Łukasz oth Węcel, Daniel oth Uchman, Wojciech oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 174 2021 635-653 19 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica (DE-627)ELV054098580 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Stanek, Bartosz verfasserin aut A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation 2021transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC Elsevier Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof oth Bartela, Łukasz oth Węcel, Daniel oth Uchman, Wojciech oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 174 2021 635-653 19 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica (DE-627)ELV054098580 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Stanek, Bartosz verfasserin aut A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation 2021transfer abstract 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC Elsevier Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof oth Bartela, Łukasz oth Węcel, Daniel oth Uchman, Wojciech oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 174 2021 635-653 19 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:174 year:2021 pages:635-653 extent:19 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Solar hybrid collectors Solar energy CPV Parabolic trough collectors PTC |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Stanek, Bartosz @@aut@@ Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof @@oth@@ Bartela, Łukasz @@oth@@ Węcel, Daniel @@oth@@ Uchman, Wojciech @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV002723662 |
| id |
ELV054098580 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV054098580</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626035659.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV054098580</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanek, Bartosz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Solar hybrid collectors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Solar energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CPV</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parabolic trough collectors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PTC</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bartela, Łukasz</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Węcel, Daniel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uchman, Wojciech</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:174</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:635-653</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">174</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">635-653</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Stanek, Bartosz |
| spellingShingle |
Stanek, Bartosz Elsevier Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation |
| authorStr |
Stanek, Bartosz |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC Elsevier |
| topic |
Elsevier Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC |
| topic_unstemmed |
Elsevier Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC |
| topic_browse |
Elsevier Solar hybrid collectors Elsevier Solar energy Elsevier CPV Elsevier Parabolic trough collectors Elsevier PTC |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k g kg ł b łb d w dw w u wu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV002723662 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| title |
A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV054098580 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3 |
| title_full |
A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation |
| author_sort |
Stanek, Bartosz |
| journal |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| journalStr |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
635 |
| author_browse |
Stanek, Bartosz |
| container_volume |
174 |
| physical |
19 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Stanek, Bartosz |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 |
| title_sort |
a system analysis of hybrid solar ptc-cpv absorber operation |
| title_auth |
A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation |
| abstract |
A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. |
| abstractGer |
A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof Bartela, Łukasz Węcel, Daniel Uchman, Wojciech |
| author2Str |
Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof Bartela, Łukasz Węcel, Daniel Uchman, Wojciech |
| ppnlink |
ELV002723662 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:46:22.199Z |
| _version_ |
1803864015843098624 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV054098580</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626035659.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001860.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV054098580</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(21)00630-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanek, Bartosz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A system analysis of hybrid solar PTC-CPV absorber operation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A system analysis of energy production was performed comparing the system of photovoltaic panels and parabolic trough collectors with a hybrid absorber. The paper presents new design of hPTC-CPV absorber. The analysis includes a comparison of the performance of both technologies in different irradiance conditions over the year. The technologies were compared for the same active surface hPTC-CPV and PV. The analysis was performed for a single-family house based on its demand for heat, electricity, and cooling. The calculations are intended to show to what extent an analyzed renewable technology can cover the demand for particular types of energy. The analysis was carried out to assess the legitimacy of using hybrid radiation absorbers in a temperate climate. Hybrid absorber studies were performed using CFD software. The results show that the proposed technology can compete with a PV system in terms of cooling and heat generation. Hybrid absorber covers 74.7% of heat demand for absorption cooling. PV panels with a heat pump cover 44.3% of the heat demand, PV panels with electric heaters 24.3% and hPTC-CPV absorbers 23.3%. The proposed technology cannot compete with PVs in terms of electricity production. Hybrid absorbers cover 8.2% when PVs 71.9% of electricity demand.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Solar hybrid collectors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Solar energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CPV</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parabolic trough collectors</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PTC</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bartela, Łukasz</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Węcel, Daniel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uchman, Wojciech</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:174</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:635-653</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.110</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">174</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">635-653</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.402298 |