Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill
Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hlina, Benjamin L. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Correction - 2017, an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:242 ; year:2021 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV054695929 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV054695929 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626040626.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV054695929 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.85 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hlina, Benjamin L. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. | ||
| 520 | |a Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Animal welfare |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hooks |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Catch & Release |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fish behaviour |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Glassman, Daniel M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chhor, Auston D. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Etherington, Brooke S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Elvidge, Chris K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Diggles, Benjamin K. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cooke, Steven J. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |t Correction |d 2017 |d an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV014719592 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:242 |g year:2021 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.85 |j Kardiologie |j Angiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 242 |j 2021 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
b l h bl blh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
hlinabenjaminlglassmandanielmchhorauston:2021----:okeetobtohoignuyssoitdiheair |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.85 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica (DE-627)ELV054695929 (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Hlina, Benjamin L. verfasserin aut Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Elsevier Glassman, Daniel M. oth Chhor, Auston D. oth Etherington, Brooke S. oth Elvidge, Chris K. oth Diggles, Benjamin K. oth Cooke, Steven J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Correction 2017 an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014719592 volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 242 2021 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica (DE-627)ELV054695929 (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Hlina, Benjamin L. verfasserin aut Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Elsevier Glassman, Daniel M. oth Chhor, Auston D. oth Etherington, Brooke S. oth Elvidge, Chris K. oth Diggles, Benjamin K. oth Cooke, Steven J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Correction 2017 an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014719592 volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 242 2021 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica (DE-627)ELV054695929 (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Hlina, Benjamin L. verfasserin aut Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Elsevier Glassman, Daniel M. oth Chhor, Auston D. oth Etherington, Brooke S. oth Elvidge, Chris K. oth Diggles, Benjamin K. oth Cooke, Steven J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Correction 2017 an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014719592 volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 242 2021 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica (DE-627)ELV054695929 (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Hlina, Benjamin L. verfasserin aut Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Elsevier Glassman, Daniel M. oth Chhor, Auston D. oth Etherington, Brooke S. oth Elvidge, Chris K. oth Diggles, Benjamin K. oth Cooke, Steven J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Correction 2017 an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014719592 volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 242 2021 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica (DE-627)ELV054695929 (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 610 VZ 44.85 bkl Hlina, Benjamin L. verfasserin aut Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Elsevier Glassman, Daniel M. oth Chhor, Auston D. oth Etherington, Brooke S. oth Elvidge, Chris K. oth Diggles, Benjamin K. oth Cooke, Steven J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Correction 2017 an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV014719592 volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 44.85 Kardiologie Angiologie VZ AR 242 2021 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Correction Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Correction Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:242 year:2021 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Kardiologie Angiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Animal welfare Hooks Catch & Release Fish behaviour |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Correction |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hlina, Benjamin L. @@aut@@ Glassman, Daniel M. @@oth@@ Chhor, Auston D. @@oth@@ Etherington, Brooke S. @@oth@@ Elvidge, Chris K. @@oth@@ Diggles, Benjamin K. @@oth@@ Cooke, Steven J. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV014719592 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV054695929 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV054695929</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626040626.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV054695929</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hlina, Benjamin L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Animal welfare</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hooks</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Catch & Release</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fish behaviour</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glassman, Daniel M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chhor, Auston D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Etherington, Brooke S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elvidge, Chris K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diggles, Benjamin K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cooke, Steven J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="t">Correction</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV014719592</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:242</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="j">Kardiologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Angiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">242</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hlina, Benjamin L. |
| spellingShingle |
Hlina, Benjamin L. ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill |
| authorStr |
Hlina, Benjamin L. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV014719592 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 44.85 bkl Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.85 Elsevier Animal welfare Elsevier Hooks Elsevier Catch & Release Elsevier Fish behaviour |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
d m g dm dmg a d c ad adc b s e bs bse c k e ck cke b k d bk bkd s j c sj sjc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Correction |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV014719592 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Correction |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV014719592 |
| title |
Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV054695929 (ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4 |
| title_full |
Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill |
| author_sort |
Hlina, Benjamin L. |
| journal |
Correction |
| journalStr |
Correction |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Hlina, Benjamin L. |
| container_volume |
242 |
| class |
610 VZ 44.85 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hlina, Benjamin L. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in bluegill |
| title_auth |
Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill |
| abstract |
Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. |
| abstractGer |
Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_40 |
| title_short |
Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Glassman, Daniel M. Chhor, Auston D. Etherington, Brooke S. Elvidge, Chris K. Diggles, Benjamin K. Cooke, Steven J. |
| author2Str |
Glassman, Daniel M. Chhor, Auston D. Etherington, Brooke S. Elvidge, Chris K. Diggles, Benjamin K. Cooke, Steven J. |
| ppnlink |
ELV014719592 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:26:48.918Z |
| _version_ |
1803870335317049344 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV054695929</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626040626.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210910s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001524.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV054695929</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0165-7836(21)00162-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hlina, Benjamin L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hook retention but not hooking injury is associated with behavioral differences in Bluegill</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recreational catch-and-release angling (C&R) is prevalent and growing in popularity, along with concerns over the welfare of released fish. Although there have been many studies quantifying post-release mortality in fish exposed to C&R, there is growing interest in understanding and minimizing any sublethal consequences of recreational fisheries interactions with the aim of improving fish health and welfare. Short-term fish behavior has been explored as an endpoint for C&R, but effects of hooking injury have not been examined independently of other angling stressors. We used Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) as a model to assess whether immediate injuries from hooking or the retention of a hook influenced fish behavior compared to unhooked controls using Z-maze and flight initiation distance tests. Fish that retained a hook were less likely to leave a refuge-emergence chamber than fish that were hooked–unhooked or unhooked controls. Moreover, when fish with the hook retained did leave the refuge, they were less exploratory than fish in the other two treatments. Unhooked control fish and fish that were hooked-unhooked did not significantly differ in their overall behavioral patterns outside the refuge. This suggests that fish are resilient to the acute tissue damage associated with minor hooking injuries and that reported behavioral impairments in fish after release are driven more by hook retention, physiological exhaustion from the fight, landing, and/or subsequent handling and air exposure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Animal welfare</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hooks</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Catch & Release</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fish behaviour</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glassman, Daniel M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chhor, Auston D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Etherington, Brooke S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elvidge, Chris K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diggles, Benjamin K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cooke, Steven J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="t">Correction</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on fisheries science, fishing technology and fisheries management</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV014719592</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:242</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.85</subfield><subfield code="j">Kardiologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Angiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">242</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4007235 |