Integrating social science into conservation planning
A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold - Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER, 2013, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:262 ; year:2021 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV055290124 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV055290124 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626041502.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220105s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV055290124 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 22 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 46.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Niemiec, Rebecca M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. | ||
| 520 | |a A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Gruby, Rebecca |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Quartuch, Michael |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cavaliere, Christina T. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Teel, Tara L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Crooks, Kevin |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salerno, Jonathan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Solomon, Jennifer N. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Kelly W. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gavin, Michael |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lavoie, Anna |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stronza, Amanda |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meth, Leah |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Enrici, Ash |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lanter, Katie |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Browne, Christine |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Proctor, Jonathan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Manfredo, Michael |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER |t Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |d 2013 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV011767626 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:262 |g year:2021 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_77 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 46.00 |j Tiermedizin: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 262 |j 2021 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
r m n rm rmn |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
niemiecrebeccamgrubyrebeccaquartuchmicha:2021----:nertnscasinenoosra |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
46.00 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica (DE-627)ELV055290124 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Niemiec, Rebecca M. verfasserin aut Integrating social science into conservation planning 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. Gruby, Rebecca oth Quartuch, Michael oth Cavaliere, Christina T. oth Teel, Tara L. oth Crooks, Kevin oth Salerno, Jonathan oth Solomon, Jennifer N. oth Jones, Kelly W. oth Gavin, Michael oth Lavoie, Anna oth Stronza, Amanda oth Meth, Leah oth Enrici, Ash oth Lanter, Katie oth Browne, Christine oth Proctor, Jonathan oth Manfredo, Michael oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 262 2021 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica (DE-627)ELV055290124 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Niemiec, Rebecca M. verfasserin aut Integrating social science into conservation planning 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. Gruby, Rebecca oth Quartuch, Michael oth Cavaliere, Christina T. oth Teel, Tara L. oth Crooks, Kevin oth Salerno, Jonathan oth Solomon, Jennifer N. oth Jones, Kelly W. oth Gavin, Michael oth Lavoie, Anna oth Stronza, Amanda oth Meth, Leah oth Enrici, Ash oth Lanter, Katie oth Browne, Christine oth Proctor, Jonathan oth Manfredo, Michael oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 262 2021 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica (DE-627)ELV055290124 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Niemiec, Rebecca M. verfasserin aut Integrating social science into conservation planning 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. Gruby, Rebecca oth Quartuch, Michael oth Cavaliere, Christina T. oth Teel, Tara L. oth Crooks, Kevin oth Salerno, Jonathan oth Solomon, Jennifer N. oth Jones, Kelly W. oth Gavin, Michael oth Lavoie, Anna oth Stronza, Amanda oth Meth, Leah oth Enrici, Ash oth Lanter, Katie oth Browne, Christine oth Proctor, Jonathan oth Manfredo, Michael oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 262 2021 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica (DE-627)ELV055290124 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Niemiec, Rebecca M. verfasserin aut Integrating social science into conservation planning 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. Gruby, Rebecca oth Quartuch, Michael oth Cavaliere, Christina T. oth Teel, Tara L. oth Crooks, Kevin oth Salerno, Jonathan oth Solomon, Jennifer N. oth Jones, Kelly W. oth Gavin, Michael oth Lavoie, Anna oth Stronza, Amanda oth Meth, Leah oth Enrici, Ash oth Lanter, Katie oth Browne, Christine oth Proctor, Jonathan oth Manfredo, Michael oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 262 2021 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica (DE-627)ELV055290124 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Niemiec, Rebecca M. verfasserin aut Integrating social science into conservation planning 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. Gruby, Rebecca oth Quartuch, Michael oth Cavaliere, Christina T. oth Teel, Tara L. oth Crooks, Kevin oth Salerno, Jonathan oth Solomon, Jennifer N. oth Jones, Kelly W. oth Gavin, Michael oth Lavoie, Anna oth Stronza, Amanda oth Meth, Leah oth Enrici, Ash oth Lanter, Katie oth Browne, Christine oth Proctor, Jonathan oth Manfredo, Michael oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold 2013 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV011767626 volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 46.00 Tiermedizin: Allgemeines VZ AR 262 2021 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:262 year:2021 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Tiermedizin: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. @@aut@@ Gruby, Rebecca @@oth@@ Quartuch, Michael @@oth@@ Cavaliere, Christina T. @@oth@@ Teel, Tara L. @@oth@@ Crooks, Kevin @@oth@@ Salerno, Jonathan @@oth@@ Solomon, Jennifer N. @@oth@@ Jones, Kelly W. @@oth@@ Gavin, Michael @@oth@@ Lavoie, Anna @@oth@@ Stronza, Amanda @@oth@@ Meth, Leah @@oth@@ Enrici, Ash @@oth@@ Lanter, Katie @@oth@@ Browne, Christine @@oth@@ Proctor, Jonathan @@oth@@ Manfredo, Michael @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV011767626 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV055290124 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV055290124</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626041502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220105s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV055290124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niemiec, Rebecca M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Integrating social science into conservation planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gruby, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quartuch, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cavaliere, Christina T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teel, Tara L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Crooks, Kevin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salerno, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solomon, Jennifer N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Kelly W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavin, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lavoie, Anna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stronza, Amanda</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meth, Leah</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enrici, Ash</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lanter, Katie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Browne, Christine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Proctor, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manfredo, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011767626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:262</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Tiermedizin: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">262</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. |
| spellingShingle |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| authorStr |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV011767626 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 610 - Medicine & health 630 - Agriculture & related technologies |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| topic |
ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 ddc 610 ddc 630 ssgn 22 bkl 46.00 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r g rg m q mq c t c ct ctc t l t tl tlt k c kc j s js j n s jn jns k w j kw kwj m g mg a l al a s as l m lm a e ae k l kl c b cb j p jp m m mm |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV011767626 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 610 - Medicine & health 630 - Agriculture |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV011767626 |
| title |
Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV055290124 (ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5 |
| title_full |
Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| author_sort |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. |
| journal |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| journalStr |
Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. |
| container_volume |
262 |
| class |
540 VZ 610 VZ 630 VZ 22 ssgn 46.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Niemiec, Rebecca M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 |
| dewey-full |
540 610 630 |
| title_sort |
integrating social science into conservation planning |
| title_auth |
Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| abstract |
A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. |
| abstractGer |
A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_77 |
| title_short |
Integrating social science into conservation planning |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Gruby, Rebecca Quartuch, Michael Cavaliere, Christina T. Teel, Tara L. Crooks, Kevin Salerno, Jonathan Solomon, Jennifer N. Jones, Kelly W. Gavin, Michael Lavoie, Anna Stronza, Amanda Meth, Leah Enrici, Ash Lanter, Katie Browne, Christine Proctor, Jonathan Manfredo, Michael |
| author2Str |
Gruby, Rebecca Quartuch, Michael Cavaliere, Christina T. Teel, Tara L. Crooks, Kevin Salerno, Jonathan Solomon, Jennifer N. Jones, Kelly W. Gavin, Michael Lavoie, Anna Stronza, Amanda Meth, Leah Enrici, Ash Lanter, Katie Browne, Christine Proctor, Jonathan Manfredo, Michael |
| ppnlink |
ELV011767626 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:08:42.056Z |
| _version_ |
1803850321293737984 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV055290124</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626041502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220105s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001602.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV055290124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0006-3207(21)00350-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niemiec, Rebecca M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Integrating social science into conservation planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gruby, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quartuch, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cavaliere, Christina T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teel, Tara L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Crooks, Kevin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salerno, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solomon, Jennifer N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Kelly W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gavin, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lavoie, Anna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stronza, Amanda</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meth, Leah</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enrici, Ash</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lanter, Katie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Browne, Christine</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Proctor, Jonathan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manfredo, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Bolton, Scott A. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Discovery of nonbenzamidine factor VIIa inhibitors using a biaryl acid scaffold</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV011767626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:262</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">46.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Tiermedizin: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">262</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4004126 |