Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review
With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wang, Peng [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Novel and emerging treatments for major depression - Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER, 2023, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:215 ; year:2021 ; day:1 ; month:12 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV056129467 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV056129467 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626042756.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220105s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV056129467 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wang, Peng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. | ||
| 520 | |a With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Port dominance |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Shipping network |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Complex network |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Port competitiveness |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hu, Qinyou |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xu, Yongjun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mei, Qiang |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Fei |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER |t Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |d 2023 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV010017429 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:215 |g year:2021 |g day:1 |g month:12 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 215 |j 2021 |b 1 |c 1201 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
p w pw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
wangpenghuqinyouxuyongjunmeiqiangwangfei:2021----:vlainehdoprdmnne |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica (DE-627)ELV056129467 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Peng verfasserin aut Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Elsevier Hu, Qinyou oth Xu, Yongjun oth Mei, Qiang oth Wang, Fei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 215 2021 1 1201 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica (DE-627)ELV056129467 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Peng verfasserin aut Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Elsevier Hu, Qinyou oth Xu, Yongjun oth Mei, Qiang oth Wang, Fei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 215 2021 1 1201 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica (DE-627)ELV056129467 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Peng verfasserin aut Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Elsevier Hu, Qinyou oth Xu, Yongjun oth Mei, Qiang oth Wang, Fei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 215 2021 1 1201 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica (DE-627)ELV056129467 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Peng verfasserin aut Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Elsevier Hu, Qinyou oth Xu, Yongjun oth Mei, Qiang oth Wang, Fei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 215 2021 1 1201 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica (DE-627)ELV056129467 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Peng verfasserin aut Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review 2021transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Elsevier Hu, Qinyou oth Xu, Yongjun oth Mei, Qiang oth Wang, Fei oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER Novel and emerging treatments for major depression 2023 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV010017429 volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 AR 215 2021 1 1201 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Novel and emerging treatments for major depression Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Novel and emerging treatments for major depression Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:215 year:2021 day:1 month:12 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Port dominance Shipping network Complex network Port competitiveness |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wang, Peng @@aut@@ Hu, Qinyou @@oth@@ Xu, Yongjun @@oth@@ Mei, Qiang @@oth@@ Wang, Fei @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV010017429 |
| id |
ELV056129467 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV056129467</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626042756.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220105s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV056129467</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Port dominance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Shipping network</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Complex network</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Port competitiveness</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Qinyou</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Yongjun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mei, Qiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Fei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Novel and emerging treatments for major depression</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010017429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:215</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">215</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">1201</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wang, Peng |
| spellingShingle |
Wang, Peng Elsevier Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review |
| authorStr |
Wang, Peng |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV010017429 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness Elsevier |
| topic |
Elsevier Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness |
| topic_unstemmed |
Elsevier Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness |
| topic_browse |
Elsevier Port dominance Elsevier Shipping network Elsevier Complex network Elsevier Port competitiveness |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
q h qh y x yx q m qm f w fw |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV010017429 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV010017429 |
| title |
Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV056129467 (ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3 |
| title_full |
Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review |
| author_sort |
Wang, Peng |
| journal |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| journalStr |
Novel and emerging treatments for major depression |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Wang, Peng |
| container_volume |
215 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wang, Peng |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 |
| title_sort |
evaluation methods of port dominance: a critical review |
| title_auth |
Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review |
| abstract |
With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. |
| abstractGer |
With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 |
| title_short |
Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Hu, Qinyou Xu, Yongjun Mei, Qiang Wang, Fei |
| author2Str |
Hu, Qinyou Xu, Yongjun Mei, Qiang Wang, Fei |
| ppnlink |
ELV010017429 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:30:46.165Z |
| _version_ |
1803859259467759616 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV056129467</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626042756.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220105s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001617.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV056129467</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0964-5691(21)00437-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation methods of port dominance: A critical review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With the continuous advancement of the global economy and international trade, the competition among ports becomes increasingly fierce. Numerous studies show that evaluation methods of port dominance can effectively quantify the appropriate dominance index and find the weak links to enhance ports’ comprehensive competitiveness. This paper summarizes the port dominance evaluation methods in the existing literature and expounds their importance based on the development of information technology in shipping activities. Moreover, the application scope, the advantages, and disadvantages of current evaluation methods are explained using qualitative, quantitative, deductive, and retrospective methods. It was found that, with the development of information technology, evaluation methods are becoming more comprehensive, targeted, specialized, refined, digitalized, and intelligentized. It was also found that since existing studies often adopt single-faceted evaluation methods and select a single factor for evaluation, they cannot effectively analyze and evaluate the real advantages of the port. In addition, the present paper discusses the prospects of ports and potential research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Port dominance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Shipping network</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Complex network</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Port competitiveness</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Qinyou</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Yongjun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mei, Qiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Fei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Marwaha, Steven ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Novel and emerging treatments for major depression</subfield><subfield code="d">2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV010017429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:215</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105954</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">215</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">1201</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4016542 |