Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity
Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the Sout...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kumar, Narendra [verfasserIn] Nath, Chaitanya P. [verfasserIn] Hazra, Kali K. [verfasserIn] Praharaj, Chandra S. [verfasserIn] Singh, Sati S. [verfasserIn] Singh, Narendra P. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Ecological engineering - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992, 176 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:176 |
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV056630417 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV056630417 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230926162847.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220205s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV056630417 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 58.50 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kumar, Narendra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Pulse crops | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rice–wheat | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Seasonal zero–tillage | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Weed community structure | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Weed emergence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nath, Chaitanya P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hazra, Kali K. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Praharaj, Chandra S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singh, Sati S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singh, Narendra P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ecological engineering |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992 |g 176 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320406938 |w (DE-600)2000805-3 |w (DE-576)259271063 |x 0925-8574 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:176 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 58.50 |j Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 176 | ||
| author_variant |
n k nk c p n cp cpn k k h kk kkh c s p cs csp s s s ss sss n p s np nps |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09258574:2022----::ogemmatfeoileiumngmnipsriyesnatrudercadrpignesfctoowesebn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| bklnumber |
58.50 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 doi (DE-627)ELV056630417 (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl Kumar, Narendra verfasserin aut Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence Nath, Chaitanya P. verfasserin aut Hazra, Kali K. verfasserin aut Praharaj, Chandra S. verfasserin aut Singh, Sati S. verfasserin aut Singh, Narendra P. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecological engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992 176 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406938 (DE-600)2000805-3 (DE-576)259271063 0925-8574 nnns volume:176 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.50 Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 176 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 doi (DE-627)ELV056630417 (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl Kumar, Narendra verfasserin aut Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence Nath, Chaitanya P. verfasserin aut Hazra, Kali K. verfasserin aut Praharaj, Chandra S. verfasserin aut Singh, Sati S. verfasserin aut Singh, Narendra P. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecological engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992 176 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406938 (DE-600)2000805-3 (DE-576)259271063 0925-8574 nnns volume:176 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.50 Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 176 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 doi (DE-627)ELV056630417 (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl Kumar, Narendra verfasserin aut Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence Nath, Chaitanya P. verfasserin aut Hazra, Kali K. verfasserin aut Praharaj, Chandra S. verfasserin aut Singh, Sati S. verfasserin aut Singh, Narendra P. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecological engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992 176 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406938 (DE-600)2000805-3 (DE-576)259271063 0925-8574 nnns volume:176 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.50 Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 176 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 doi (DE-627)ELV056630417 (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl Kumar, Narendra verfasserin aut Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence Nath, Chaitanya P. verfasserin aut Hazra, Kali K. verfasserin aut Praharaj, Chandra S. verfasserin aut Singh, Sati S. verfasserin aut Singh, Narendra P. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecological engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992 176 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406938 (DE-600)2000805-3 (DE-576)259271063 0925-8574 nnns volume:176 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.50 Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 176 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 doi (DE-627)ELV056630417 (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl Kumar, Narendra verfasserin aut Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence Nath, Chaitanya P. verfasserin aut Hazra, Kali K. verfasserin aut Praharaj, Chandra S. verfasserin aut Singh, Sati S. verfasserin aut Singh, Narendra P. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecological engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992 176 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406938 (DE-600)2000805-3 (DE-576)259271063 0925-8574 nnns volume:176 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.50 Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 176 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Ecological engineering 176 volume:176 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Ecological engineering 176 volume:176 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Ecological engineering |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kumar, Narendra @@aut@@ Nath, Chaitanya P. @@aut@@ Hazra, Kali K. @@aut@@ Praharaj, Chandra S. @@aut@@ Singh, Sati S. @@aut@@ Singh, Narendra P. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
320406938 |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
ELV056630417 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV056630417</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230926162847.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220205s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV056630417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kumar, Narendra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pulse crops</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rice–wheat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Seasonal zero–tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weed community structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weed emergence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nath, Chaitanya P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hazra, Kali K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Praharaj, Chandra S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Sati S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Narendra P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">176</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320406938</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2000805-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259271063</subfield><subfield code="x">0925-8574</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">176</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kumar, Narendra |
| spellingShingle |
Kumar, Narendra ddc 690 fid BIODIV bkl 58.50 misc Pulse crops misc Rice–wheat misc Seasonal zero–tillage misc Weed community structure misc Weed emergence Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| authorStr |
Kumar, Narendra |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320406938 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0925-8574 |
| topic_title |
690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity Pulse crops Rice–wheat Seasonal zero–tillage Weed community structure Weed emergence |
| topic |
ddc 690 fid BIODIV bkl 58.50 misc Pulse crops misc Rice–wheat misc Seasonal zero–tillage misc Weed community structure misc Weed emergence |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 fid BIODIV bkl 58.50 misc Pulse crops misc Rice–wheat misc Seasonal zero–tillage misc Weed community structure misc Weed emergence |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 fid BIODIV bkl 58.50 misc Pulse crops misc Rice–wheat misc Seasonal zero–tillage misc Weed community structure misc Weed emergence |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Ecological engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
320406938 |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Ecological engineering |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320406938 (DE-600)2000805-3 (DE-576)259271063 |
| title |
Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV056630417 (ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5 |
| title_full |
Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| author_sort |
Kumar, Narendra |
| journal |
Ecological engineering |
| journalStr |
Ecological engineering |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| author_browse |
Kumar, Narendra Nath, Chaitanya P. Hazra, Kali K. Praharaj, Chandra S. Singh, Sati S. Singh, Narendra P. |
| container_volume |
176 |
| class |
690 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 58.50 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kumar, Narendra |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 |
| dewey-full |
690 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| title_auth |
Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| abstract |
Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. |
| abstractGer |
Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
| title_short |
Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Nath, Chaitanya P. Hazra, Kali K. Praharaj, Chandra S. Singh, Sati S. Singh, Narendra P. |
| author2Str |
Nath, Chaitanya P. Hazra, Kali K. Praharaj, Chandra S. Singh, Sati S. Singh, Narendra P. |
| ppnlink |
320406938 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:57:12.634Z |
| _version_ |
1803864697876774912 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV056630417</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230926162847.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220205s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106540</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV056630417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0925-8574(22)00001-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kumar, Narendra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Long-term impact of zero-till residue management in post-rainy seasons after puddled rice and cropping intensification on weed seedbank, above-ground weed flora and crop productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Regulation in weed seed recruitment to soil and its emergence is an ecological approach of weed management for sustainable cropping intensification and land restoration. Intensive tillage operations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system is a predominant practice in the South East Asian countries. This practice has emerged as an unsustainable crop management options. Consequently, zero tillage (ZT) in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled (CT) puddled transplanted rice is being adopted to minimize tillage intensity in system in these regions. However, long–term impact of continuous CT in all seasons versus seasonal ZT (in post–rainy seasons) after puddled transplanted rice with crop residues in cropping system mode on above– and below– ground weed density and diversity is not adequately studied. Hence, we examined four tillage based residue management: (i) conventional tillage in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) conventional tillage in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT + R), (iii) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT + R) each with three levels of crop rotation: (i) rice – wheat (R–W), (ii) rice – chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C), (iii) rice – chickpea – mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) (R–C–Mb) in split–plot design in Kanpur, India. Zero tillage in post–rainy seasons after conventional tilled rice resulted in 11%, 23%, and 13% lower (P < 0.05) weed seed density than CT–CT at 0–7.5, 7.5–15, and 0–15 cm depth, respectively. However, zero-tilled residue management had 15–19% and 10–14% (P < 0.05) higher above–ground weed density compared with CT–CT. Rice-chickpea-mungbean rotation reduced weed seed density by 6–11%, 4–11%, and 6–8% (P < 0.05) than those of rice-wheat and rice-chickpea across depth. In contrast, rice-chickpea-mungbean had 30–38% higher total above–ground weed density than rest of the crop rotations. Post–rainy seasons zero tillage with and without residues attributed higher weed diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) compared with conventional tillage in seedbank. Importantly, CT–ZT + R with R–C–Mb (interaction) reduced 24% total viable seed density at 0–15 cm depth than CT–CT with R–W. Further, this system brought about 15% and 62% higher rice seed yield and system productivity over CT–CT with R–W, respectively. Conventional tilled puddled transplanted rice – zero tillage with added residues increased 16% and 33% seed yield of wheat and chickpea compared with CT–CT (P < 0.05), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that zero tillage in post-rainy seasons after puddled transplanted rice and intensive pulse based cropping (rice-chickpea-mungbean) can minimize viable weed seeds in soil vis–a–vis above–ground weed density over time than conventional tillage and rice-wheat system. The reduced weed density could reduce soil fertility degradation, enhance crop/system productivity, restore soil health and provides opportunity for sustainable cropping intensification in rice ecologies of the Indo-Gangetic plains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pulse crops</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rice–wheat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Seasonal zero–tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weed community structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weed emergence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nath, Chaitanya P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hazra, Kali K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Praharaj, Chandra S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Sati S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Narendra P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">176</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320406938</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2000805-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259271063</subfield><subfield code="x">0925-8574</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Umwelttechnik: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">176</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401211 |