Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability
According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Cecconet, Daniele [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata - Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER, 2019, chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:297 ; year:2022 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV057410224 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV057410224 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626045046.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV057410224 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |a 620 |q VZ |
084 | |a 54.25 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cecconet, Daniele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability |
264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). | ||
520 | |a According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). | ||
650 | 7 | |a Urban wastewater |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Anaerobic sludge digestion |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Biogas |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Low temperature anaerobic process |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Mainardis, Matia |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Callegari, Arianna |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Capodaglio, Andrea G. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER |t MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |d 2019 |d chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV002112701 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:297 |g year:2022 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
936 | b | k | |a 54.25 |j Parallele Datenverarbeitung |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 297 |j 2022 |h 0 |
author_variant |
d c dc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
cecconetdanielemainardismatiacallegariar:2022----:scrpiitetetfuiiawseaewtaobndabssseadesetvso |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
54.25 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica (DE-627)ELV057410224 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Cecconet, Daniele verfasserin aut Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Elsevier Mainardis, Matia oth Callegari, Arianna oth Capodaglio, Andrea G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 297 2022 0 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica (DE-627)ELV057410224 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Cecconet, Daniele verfasserin aut Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Elsevier Mainardis, Matia oth Callegari, Arianna oth Capodaglio, Andrea G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 297 2022 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica (DE-627)ELV057410224 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Cecconet, Daniele verfasserin aut Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Elsevier Mainardis, Matia oth Callegari, Arianna oth Capodaglio, Andrea G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 297 2022 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica (DE-627)ELV057410224 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Cecconet, Daniele verfasserin aut Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Elsevier Mainardis, Matia oth Callegari, Arianna oth Capodaglio, Andrea G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 297 2022 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica (DE-627)ELV057410224 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Cecconet, Daniele verfasserin aut Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Elsevier Mainardis, Matia oth Callegari, Arianna oth Capodaglio, Andrea G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 297 2022 0 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:297 year:2022 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Parallele Datenverarbeitung |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Urban wastewater Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Anaerobic sludge digestion Biogas Low temperature anaerobic process |
dewey-raw |
004 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cecconet, Daniele @@aut@@ Mainardis, Matia @@oth@@ Callegari, Arianna @@oth@@ Capodaglio, Andrea G. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV002112701 |
dewey-sort |
14 |
id |
ELV057410224 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057410224</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045046.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057410224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cecconet, Daniele</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urban wastewater</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Anaerobic sludge digestion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biogas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Low temperature anaerobic process</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mainardis, Matia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Callegari, Arianna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Capodaglio, Andrea G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002112701</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:297</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="j">Parallele Datenverarbeitung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">297</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Cecconet, Daniele |
spellingShingle |
Cecconet, Daniele ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability |
authorStr |
Cecconet, Daniele |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV002112701 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process |
topic_browse |
ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Urban wastewater Elsevier Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor Elsevier Anaerobic sludge digestion Elsevier Biogas Elsevier Low temperature anaerobic process |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
m m mm a c ac a g c ag agc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV002112701 |
dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems 620 - Engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV002112701 |
title |
Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV057410224 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4 |
title_full |
Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability |
author_sort |
Cecconet, Daniele |
journal |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
journalStr |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Cecconet, Daniele |
container_volume |
297 |
class |
004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Cecconet, Daniele |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 |
dewey-full |
004 620 |
title_sort |
psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined uasb/asd system, and perspectives for improving urban wwtp sustainability |
title_auth |
Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability |
abstract |
According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). |
abstractGer |
According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). |
abstract_unstemmed |
According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs). |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Mainardis, Matia Callegari, Arianna Capodaglio, Andrea G. |
author2Str |
Mainardis, Matia Callegari, Arianna Capodaglio, Andrea G. |
ppnlink |
ELV002112701 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T23:09:05.945Z |
_version_ |
1803872995582672896 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057410224</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045046.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001926.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057410224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)00721-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cecconet, Daniele</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">According to new paradigms of urban wastewater management, energy savings and resources and energy recovery from sewage will assume an ever-increasing importance. Anaerobic processes, aside from being more energy efficient than conventional aerobic ones, are particularly suited to recover embedded organic energy, improving the overall energy balance of treatment processes, however, their performance is limited by low temperatures and slower kinetics. In this study, a pilot Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor was operated to treat municipal wastewater at low temperature regime (16.5–18.5 °C) for 22 weeks, both as standalone process and combined with a sidestream anaerobic sludge digester. Process performance highlighted good system robustness, as proved by stable pH and volatile fatty acid/total alkaline buffer capacity ratio, even though observed methane yield was low. Observed COD and TSS removal efficiencies were in the ranges of 60–69% and 63–73%, respectively. Methane production ranged between 0.106 and 0.132 Nm3 CH4/kgCODrem. An economic assessment was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of implementing UASB pre-treatment of municipal wastewater in existing conventional facilities (activated sludge and anaerobic sludge digestion), showing that significant energy demand reduction could be achieved for both biological secondary treatment and sludge management, leading to considerable operational economies, and possible positive economic returns within a short pay-back period (3–4 yrs).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urban wastewater</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Anaerobic sludge digestion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biogas</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Low temperature anaerobic process</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mainardis, Matia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Callegari, Arianna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Capodaglio, Andrea G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002112701</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:297</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134228</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="j">Parallele Datenverarbeitung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">297</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399168 |