How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California
Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ledna, Catherine [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan - Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER, 2019, the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:165 ; year:2022 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV057615128 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV057615128 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626045427.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV057615128 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ledna, Catherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. | ||
| 520 | |a Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Decarbonization |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Subsidies |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Charging infrastructure |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Electric vehicles (EVs) |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Muratori, Matteo |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brooker, Aaron |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wood, Eric |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Greene, David |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER |t Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan |d 2019 |d the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003447960 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:165 |g year:2022 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 165 |j 2022 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
c l cl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
lednacatherinemuratorimatteobrookeraaron:2022----:otspotvdpinrdofbtenhrignrsrcuenetetad |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
77.50 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica (DE-627)ELV057615128 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Ledna, Catherine verfasserin aut How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) Elsevier Muratori, Matteo oth Brooker, Aaron oth Wood, Eric oth Greene, David oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan 2019 the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003447960 volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 165 2022 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica (DE-627)ELV057615128 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Ledna, Catherine verfasserin aut How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) Elsevier Muratori, Matteo oth Brooker, Aaron oth Wood, Eric oth Greene, David oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan 2019 the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003447960 volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 165 2022 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica (DE-627)ELV057615128 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Ledna, Catherine verfasserin aut How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) Elsevier Muratori, Matteo oth Brooker, Aaron oth Wood, Eric oth Greene, David oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan 2019 the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003447960 volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 165 2022 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica (DE-627)ELV057615128 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Ledna, Catherine verfasserin aut How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) Elsevier Muratori, Matteo oth Brooker, Aaron oth Wood, Eric oth Greene, David oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan 2019 the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003447960 volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 165 2022 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica (DE-627)ELV057615128 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Ledna, Catherine verfasserin aut How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) Elsevier Muratori, Matteo oth Brooker, Aaron oth Wood, Eric oth Greene, David oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan 2019 the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003447960 volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 165 2022 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:165 year:2022 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Psychophysiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Decarbonization Subsidies Charging infrastructure Electric vehicles (EVs) Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ledna, Catherine @@aut@@ Muratori, Matteo @@oth@@ Brooker, Aaron @@oth@@ Wood, Eric @@oth@@ Greene, David @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003447960 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV057615128 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057615128</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045427.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057615128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ledna, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Decarbonization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Subsidies</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Charging infrastructure</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Electric vehicles (EVs)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muratori, Matteo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brooker, Aaron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wood, Eric</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greene, David</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003447960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:165</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">165</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ledna, Catherine |
| spellingShingle |
Ledna, Catherine ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Elsevier Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California |
| authorStr |
Ledna, Catherine |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003447960 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 77.50 bkl How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Elsevier Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Elsevier Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 77.50 Elsevier Decarbonization Elsevier Subsidies Elsevier Charging infrastructure Elsevier Electric vehicles (EVs) Elsevier Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m m mm a b ab e w ew d g dg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003447960 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003447960 |
| title |
How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV057615128 (ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2 |
| title_full |
How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California |
| author_sort |
Ledna, Catherine |
| journal |
Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan |
| journalStr |
Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Ledna, Catherine |
| container_volume |
165 |
| class |
610 VZ 77.50 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ledna, Catherine |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
how to support ev adoption: tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in california |
| title_auth |
How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California |
| abstract |
Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. |
| abstractGer |
Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Muratori, Matteo Brooker, Aaron Wood, Eric Greene, David |
| author2Str |
Muratori, Matteo Brooker, Aaron Wood, Eric Greene, David |
| ppnlink |
ELV003447960 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T16:39:23.911Z |
| _version_ |
1803848477742989312 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057615128</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045427.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001951.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057615128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-4215(22)00156-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ledna, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Supporting the adoption of zero-emission vehicle (ZEVs), including plug-in electric vehicles (EVs), has become a priority for governments due to their ability to reduce petroleum demand, improve air quality, and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Optimal strategies to accelerate EV adoption must weigh the relative value of alternative policy mechanisms to consumers, including public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies. We use a historically validated light-duty vehicle consumer choice tool, the ADOPT model, to simulate personal light-duty vehicle adoption and related emissions in California. ADOPT is updated to incorporate a quantification of the tangible value of public charging infrastructure, allowing us to simulate the impact of investments in public charging infrastructure and vehicle purchase subsidies under different scenarios. We show that both policies result in increased EV adoption, with the most effective policy varying depending on vehicle technology assumptions. Under conservative technology improvement assumptions, infrastructure investments are most effective in promoting EV sales and reducing CO2 emissions, while under optimistic technology improvement assumptions a combination of infrastructure and subsidies best supports EV sales and CO2 emission reductions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Decarbonization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Subsidies</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Charging infrastructure</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Electric vehicles (EVs)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zero emissions vehicles (ZEV)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muratori, Matteo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brooker, Aaron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wood, Eric</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greene, David</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Hering, Alexandra ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal of the political, economic, planning, environmental and social aspects of energy</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003447960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:165</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112931</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">165</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4005413 |