Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS
Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cy...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Rowe, T. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease - Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER, 2019, an international journal, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:162 ; year:2022 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV057628084 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV057628084 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626045441.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV057628084 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.90 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 44.65 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rowe, T. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. | ||
| 520 | |a Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Building integrated greenery |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Living wall systems (LWS) |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Life cycle analysis (LCA) |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Environmental design |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Vertical greening systems (VGS) |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Green facades (GF) |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Poppe, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buyle, M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Belmans, B. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Audenaert, A. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER |t Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease |d 2019 |d an international journal |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003073483 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:162 |g year:2022 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.90 |j Neurologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.65 |j Chirurgie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 162 |j 2022 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
t r tr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
rowetpoppejbuylembelmansbaudenaerta:2022----:shssanbltptnilfetclreigytmdelroeetbihnuiomulnsoe |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.90 44.65 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica (DE-627)ELV057628084 (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl Rowe, T. verfasserin aut Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Elsevier Poppe, J. oth Buyle, M. oth Belmans, B. oth Audenaert, A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease 2019 an international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003073483 volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.90 Neurologie VZ 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 162 2022 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica (DE-627)ELV057628084 (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl Rowe, T. verfasserin aut Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Elsevier Poppe, J. oth Buyle, M. oth Belmans, B. oth Audenaert, A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease 2019 an international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003073483 volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.90 Neurologie VZ 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 162 2022 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica (DE-627)ELV057628084 (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl Rowe, T. verfasserin aut Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Elsevier Poppe, J. oth Buyle, M. oth Belmans, B. oth Audenaert, A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease 2019 an international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003073483 volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.90 Neurologie VZ 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 162 2022 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica (DE-627)ELV057628084 (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl Rowe, T. verfasserin aut Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Elsevier Poppe, J. oth Buyle, M. oth Belmans, B. oth Audenaert, A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease 2019 an international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003073483 volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.90 Neurologie VZ 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 162 2022 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica (DE-627)ELV057628084 (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl Rowe, T. verfasserin aut Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Elsevier Poppe, J. oth Buyle, M. oth Belmans, B. oth Audenaert, A. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease 2019 an international journal Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003073483 volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.90 Neurologie VZ 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 162 2022 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:162 year:2022 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Neurologie Chirurgie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Building integrated greenery Living wall systems (LWS) Life cycle analysis (LCA) Environmental design Vertical greening systems (VGS) Green facades (GF) |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Rowe, T. @@aut@@ Poppe, J. @@oth@@ Buyle, M. @@oth@@ Belmans, B. @@oth@@ Audenaert, A. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003073483 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV057628084 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057628084</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057628084</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rowe, T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Building integrated greenery</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Living wall systems (LWS)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Life cycle analysis (LCA)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Environmental design</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vertical greening systems (VGS)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Green facades (GF)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poppe, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buyle, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Belmans, B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Audenaert, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003073483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:162</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">162</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Rowe, T. |
| spellingShingle |
Rowe, T. ddc 610 bkl 44.90 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS |
| authorStr |
Rowe, T. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003073483 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.90 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.90 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.90 bkl 44.65 Elsevier Building integrated greenery Elsevier Living wall systems (LWS) Elsevier Life cycle analysis (LCA) Elsevier Environmental design Elsevier Vertical greening systems (VGS) Elsevier Green facades (GF) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j p jp m b mb b b bb a a aa |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003073483 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003073483 |
| title |
Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV057628084 (ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7 |
| title_full |
Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS |
| author_sort |
Rowe, T. |
| journal |
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease |
| journalStr |
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Rowe, T. |
| container_volume |
162 |
| class |
610 VZ 44.90 bkl 44.65 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Rowe, T. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of vgs |
| title_auth |
Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS |
| abstract |
Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. |
| abstractGer |
Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Poppe, J. Buyle, M. Belmans, B. Audenaert, A. |
| author2Str |
Poppe, J. Buyle, M. Belmans, B. Audenaert, A. |
| ppnlink |
ELV003073483 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T16:41:43.425Z |
| _version_ |
1803848624034021376 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057628084</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001892.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057628084</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1364-0321(22)00322-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rowe, T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Building-related green infrastructures can help reduce several problems associated with urban life. However, while green roofs are reasonably well established and researched, questions remain about the environmental sustainability of vertical greening systems. This article reviews the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to answer these questions. Methodological choices made in current LCA studies for modeling vertical greening systems are assessed. It is shown that a wide variety in boundary conditions used and assumptions made is prevalent. Based on the lessons learned a framework outline is proposed as a first step towards a more standardized assessment methodology. This outline is built around the life cycle phases and the boundary conditions of vertical greening systems, complemented by case specific data requirements and delivered benefits. The reviewed studies are compared with the framework to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement of current practices. It can be concluded that, to correctly represent the environmental impact of vertical greening systems, the associated benefits need to be better accounted for. For some benefits, i.e., energy savings due to reduced heating/cooling demand, CO2 sequestration, and air pollution reduction, it should be possible to implement them into LCA studies in the short to medium term because basic models and data are available for integration in the state-of-the-art. For other benefits, such as impacts on biodiversity, noise reduction, and psychological and health effects, quantitative data are still lacking, and additional research should be carried out to enable their integration.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Building integrated greenery</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Living wall systems (LWS)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Life cycle analysis (LCA)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Environmental design</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vertical greening systems (VGS)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Green facades (GF)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poppe, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buyle, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Belmans, B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Audenaert, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Soke, Fatih ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the squares test for manual dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003073483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:162</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112414</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">162</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4020147 |