Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model
A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Schubert, Benjamin W. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy - Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER, 2015, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:254 ; year:2022 ; day:15 ; month:06 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV057678995 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV057678995 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626045542.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV057678995 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 42.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Schubert, Benjamin W. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. | ||
| 520 | |a A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Computational fluid dynamics |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nonlinear stiffness |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Submerged point absorber |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Bistable |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Passive control |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Robertson, William S.P. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cazzolato, Benjamin S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghayesh, Mergen H. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER |t Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy |d 2015 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV01276728X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:254 |g year:2022 |g day:15 |g month:06 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.13 |j Molekularbiologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 254 |j 2022 |b 15 |c 0615 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
b w s bw bws |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
schubertbenjaminwrobertsonwilliamspcazzo:2022----:olnasifesnacmnosbegdaenryei |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
42.13 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica (DE-627)ELV057678995 (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Schubert, Benjamin W. verfasserin aut Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Elsevier Robertson, William S.P. oth Cazzolato, Benjamin S. oth Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. oth Ghayesh, Mergen H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01276728X volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 254 2022 15 0615 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica (DE-627)ELV057678995 (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Schubert, Benjamin W. verfasserin aut Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Elsevier Robertson, William S.P. oth Cazzolato, Benjamin S. oth Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. oth Ghayesh, Mergen H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01276728X volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 254 2022 15 0615 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica (DE-627)ELV057678995 (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Schubert, Benjamin W. verfasserin aut Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Elsevier Robertson, William S.P. oth Cazzolato, Benjamin S. oth Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. oth Ghayesh, Mergen H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01276728X volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 254 2022 15 0615 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica (DE-627)ELV057678995 (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Schubert, Benjamin W. verfasserin aut Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Elsevier Robertson, William S.P. oth Cazzolato, Benjamin S. oth Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. oth Ghayesh, Mergen H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01276728X volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 254 2022 15 0615 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica (DE-627)ELV057678995 (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 VZ 660 VZ 540 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Schubert, Benjamin W. verfasserin aut Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Elsevier Robertson, William S.P. oth Cazzolato, Benjamin S. oth Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. oth Ghayesh, Mergen H. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy 2015 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV01276728X volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 42.13 Molekularbiologie VZ AR 254 2022 15 0615 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:254 year:2022 day:15 month:06 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Molekularbiologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Computational fluid dynamics Nonlinear stiffness Submerged point absorber Bistable Passive control |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Schubert, Benjamin W. @@aut@@ Robertson, William S.P. @@oth@@ Cazzolato, Benjamin S. @@oth@@ Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. @@oth@@ Ghayesh, Mergen H. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV01276728X |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
ELV057678995 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057678995</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045542.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057678995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schubert, Benjamin W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computational fluid dynamics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nonlinear stiffness</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Submerged point absorber</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bistable</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Passive control</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robertson, William S.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cazzolato, Benjamin S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sergiienko, Nataliia Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghayesh, Mergen H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV01276728X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:254</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Molekularbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">254</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0615</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Schubert, Benjamin W. |
| spellingShingle |
Schubert, Benjamin W. ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| authorStr |
Schubert, Benjamin W. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV01276728X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences 660 - Chemical engineering |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
540 VZ 660 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 ddc 660 fid BIODIV bkl 42.13 Elsevier Computational fluid dynamics Elsevier Nonlinear stiffness Elsevier Submerged point absorber Elsevier Bistable Elsevier Passive control |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
w s r ws wsr b s c bs bsc n y s ny nys m h g mh mhg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV01276728X |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry 660 - Chemical engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV01276728X |
| title |
Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV057678995 (ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6 |
| title_full |
Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| author_sort |
Schubert, Benjamin W. |
| journal |
Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy |
| journalStr |
Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Schubert, Benjamin W. |
| container_volume |
254 |
| class |
540 VZ 660 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.13 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Schubert, Benjamin W. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 |
| dewey-full |
540 660 |
| title_sort |
nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| title_auth |
Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| abstract |
A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. |
| abstractGer |
A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Robertson, William S.P. Cazzolato, Benjamin S. Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. Ghayesh, Mergen H. |
| author2Str |
Robertson, William S.P. Cazzolato, Benjamin S. Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. Ghayesh, Mergen H. |
| ppnlink |
ELV01276728X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T16:50:53.313Z |
| _version_ |
1803849200632332288 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057678995</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045542.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001799.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057678995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0029-8018(22)00688-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schubert, Benjamin W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nonlinear stiffness enhancement of submerged wave energy device in high fidelity model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A three degree of freedom submerged wave energy converter with a nonlinear stiffness mechanism was modelled using both linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics. The linear hydrodynamics scenario used linear potential flow methods to predict the fluid–structure interaction, while the nonlinear hydrodynamic scenario use computational fluid dynamics (OpenFOAM). The potential energy of the nonlinear stiffness mechanism was varied relative to the potential energy of the incident wave. The wave energy converter was excited using regular and irregular waves. The nonlinear stiffness scenarios were compared to scenarios with optimised linear control parameters. When compared to optimal conditions, models using linear hydrodynamics to emulate both regular and irregular waves showed no improvement in power generation. In the regular wave nonlinear hydrodynamic scenarios, the nonlinear stiffness showed inconsistent improvements to power production and significant detuning at different levels of nonlinearity. The irregular wave scenario using nonlinear hydrodynamic methods demonstrated a small improvement compared to optimised linear control parameters when the nonlinear stiffness potential energy peak was less than half the potential energy of the incident wave. The nonlinear stiffness improved the robustness of the wave energy converter, and was an effective method for detuning the system, depending on the degree of nonlinearity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computational fluid dynamics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nonlinear stiffness</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Submerged point absorber</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bistable</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Passive control</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robertson, William S.P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cazzolato, Benjamin S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sergiienko, Nataliia Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghayesh, Mergen H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Chang, Guanru ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-healable hydrogel on tumor cell as drug delivery system for localized and effective therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV01276728X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:254</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111295</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Molekularbiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">254</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0615</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3993874 |