How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information
This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- es...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jelić, Margareta [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator - Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER, 2017, international journal of psychonomics, Amsterdam |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:227 ; year:2022 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV057874603 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV057874603 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626045912.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV057874603 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
084 | |a 44.91 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jelić, Margareta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. | ||
520 | |a This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER |t Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator |d 2017 |d international journal of psychonomics |g Amsterdam |w (DE-627)ELV015209474 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:227 |g year:2022 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
936 | b | k | |a 44.91 |j Psychiatrie |j Psychopathologie |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 227 |j 2022 |h 0 |
author_variant |
m j mj |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
jelimargareta:2022----:odwpoesedakhrlosleteipoesnslrltdn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
44.91 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica (DE-627)ELV057874603 (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Jelić, Margareta verfasserin aut How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. Enthalten in Elsevier Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator 2017 international journal of psychonomics Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV015209474 volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 227 2022 0 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica (DE-627)ELV057874603 (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Jelić, Margareta verfasserin aut How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. Enthalten in Elsevier Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator 2017 international journal of psychonomics Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV015209474 volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 227 2022 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica (DE-627)ELV057874603 (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Jelić, Margareta verfasserin aut How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. Enthalten in Elsevier Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator 2017 international journal of psychonomics Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV015209474 volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 227 2022 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica (DE-627)ELV057874603 (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Jelić, Margareta verfasserin aut How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. Enthalten in Elsevier Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator 2017 international journal of psychonomics Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV015209474 volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 227 2022 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica (DE-627)ELV057874603 (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl Jelić, Margareta verfasserin aut How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. Enthalten in Elsevier Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator 2017 international journal of psychonomics Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV015209474 volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.91 Psychiatrie Psychopathologie VZ AR 227 2022 0 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator Amsterdam volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator Amsterdam volume:227 year:2022 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Psychiatrie Psychopathologie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
530 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jelić, Margareta @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV015209474 |
dewey-sort |
3530 |
id |
ELV057874603 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057874603</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045912.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057874603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jelić, Margareta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">international journal of psychonomics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV015209474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:227</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychiatrie</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychopathologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">227</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jelić, Margareta |
spellingShingle |
Jelić, Margareta ddc 530 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.91 How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
authorStr |
Jelić, Margareta |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV015209474 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering & allied operations 610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
topic |
ddc 530 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.91 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.91 |
topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.91 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV015209474 |
dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering 610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV015209474 |
title |
How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV057874603 (ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X |
title_full |
How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
author_sort |
Jelić, Margareta |
journal |
Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator |
journalStr |
Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Jelić, Margareta |
container_volume |
227 |
class |
530 VZ 620 VZ 610 VZ 44.91 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jelić, Margareta |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 |
dewey-full |
530 620 610 |
title_sort |
how do we process feedback? the role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
title_auth |
How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
abstract |
This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. |
abstractGer |
This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
title_short |
How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
ELV015209474 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T17:25:13.568Z |
_version_ |
1803851360968376320 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057874603</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045912.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001788.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057874603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0001-6918(22)00107-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jelić, Margareta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How do we process feedback? The role of self-esteem in processing self-related and other-related information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study was designed to investigate the effect of the level and stability of self-esteem on self-referent vs. other-referent feedback recall and to determine which of the opposed self-concept motives, self-enhancement or self-verification, will prevail in adolescents with certain type of self- esteem. In a between-subjects experimental design, 450 high school graduates and freshmen were randomly assigned to a self-referent task (n = 230) or other-referent task (n = 220) and their self-esteem was measured by repeated administration of the RSE scale. After personality and cognitive ability test, participants in a self-referent task were presented with a bogus feedback which consisted of statements that described a specific positive or negative behavior that one is likely to do. Participants in the other-referent received the same information, but relating to an unknown person. Memory was tested on a surprise free recall task. Findings confirm preferential processing of self-related information, i.e. self-reference effect, regardless of valence and content-related domain of feedback. Participants in self-referent condition also showed better recall of positive than negative personally relevant feedback, regardless of their self-esteem stability or self-esteem level. However, interaction of self-esteem level and self-esteem stability was significant, but its effect was relatively small.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Eryürek, M. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Integrated humidity sensor based on SU-8 polymer microdisk microresonator</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">international journal of psychonomics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV015209474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:227</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103592</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.91</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychiatrie</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychopathologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">227</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400401 |