Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles
Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emissio...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Guo, Dongdong [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata - Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER, 2019, chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:301 ; year:2022 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV057922772 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV057922772 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626045950.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV057922772 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |a 620 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 54.25 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Guo, Dongdong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. | ||
| 520 | |a Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Filtration efficiency |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Real driving emission (RDE) |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Drive cycle |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ge, Yunshan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xin |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Haixu |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Su, Sheng |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Chunbo |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tao, Tinghong |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER |t MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |d 2019 |d chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV002112701 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:301 |g year:2022 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 54.25 |j Parallele Datenverarbeitung |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 301 |j 2022 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
d g dg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
guodongdonggeyunshanwangxinliuhaixusushe:2022----:vlaighflrtoefcecocoeopectlzdaoieatcltflecpo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
54.25 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica (DE-627)ELV057922772 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Guo, Dongdong verfasserin aut Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Elsevier Ge, Yunshan oth Wang, Xin oth Liu, Haixu oth Su, Sheng oth Li, Chunbo oth Tao, Tinghong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 301 2022 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica (DE-627)ELV057922772 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Guo, Dongdong verfasserin aut Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Elsevier Ge, Yunshan oth Wang, Xin oth Liu, Haixu oth Su, Sheng oth Li, Chunbo oth Tao, Tinghong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 301 2022 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica (DE-627)ELV057922772 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Guo, Dongdong verfasserin aut Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Elsevier Ge, Yunshan oth Wang, Xin oth Liu, Haixu oth Su, Sheng oth Li, Chunbo oth Tao, Tinghong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 301 2022 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica (DE-627)ELV057922772 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Guo, Dongdong verfasserin aut Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Elsevier Ge, Yunshan oth Wang, Xin oth Liu, Haixu oth Su, Sheng oth Li, Chunbo oth Tao, Tinghong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 301 2022 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica (DE-627)ELV057922772 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Guo, Dongdong verfasserin aut Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Elsevier Ge, Yunshan oth Wang, Xin oth Liu, Haixu oth Su, Sheng oth Li, Chunbo oth Tao, Tinghong oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata 2019 chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002112701 volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 54.25 Parallele Datenverarbeitung VZ AR 301 2022 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:301 year:2022 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Parallele Datenverarbeitung |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Filtration efficiency Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Real driving emission (RDE) Drive cycle |
| dewey-raw |
004 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Guo, Dongdong @@aut@@ Ge, Yunshan @@oth@@ Wang, Xin @@oth@@ Liu, Haixu @@oth@@ Su, Sheng @@oth@@ Li, Chunbo @@oth@@ Tao, Tinghong @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV002112701 |
| dewey-sort |
14 |
| id |
ELV057922772 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057922772</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045950.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057922772</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guo, Dongdong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Filtration efficiency</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gasoline particulate filter (GPF)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Real driving emission (RDE)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Drive cycle</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ge, Yunshan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Xin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Haixu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Su, Sheng</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Chunbo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao, Tinghong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002112701</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:301</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="j">Parallele Datenverarbeitung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">301</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Guo, Dongdong |
| spellingShingle |
Guo, Dongdong ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles |
| authorStr |
Guo, Dongdong |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV002112701 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle |
| topic_browse |
ddc 004 bkl 54.25 Elsevier Filtration efficiency Elsevier Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) Elsevier Real driving emission (RDE) Elsevier Drive cycle |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
y g yg x w xw h l hl s s ss c l cl t t tt |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV002112701 |
| dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems 620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV002112701 |
| title |
Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV057922772 (ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3 |
| title_full |
Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles |
| author_sort |
Guo, Dongdong |
| journal |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
| journalStr |
MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Guo, Dongdong |
| container_volume |
301 |
| class |
004 620 VZ 54.25 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Guo, Dongdong |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 |
| dewey-full |
004 620 |
| title_sort |
evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cgpf) over the wltc and simulated rde cycles |
| title_auth |
Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles |
| abstract |
Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. |
| abstractGer |
Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ge, Yunshan Wang, Xin Liu, Haixu Su, Sheng Li, Chunbo Tao, Tinghong |
| author2Str |
Ge, Yunshan Wang, Xin Liu, Haixu Su, Sheng Li, Chunbo Tao, Tinghong |
| ppnlink |
ELV002112701 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:33:25Z |
| _version_ |
1803851876272177152 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV057922772</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626045950.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001790.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV057922772</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0045-6535(22)01210-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guo, Dongdong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Filtration efficiency</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gasoline particulate filter (GPF)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Real driving emission (RDE)</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Drive cycle</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ge, Yunshan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Xin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Haixu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Su, Sheng</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Chunbo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao, Tinghong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Shterenlikht, Anton ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">MPI vs Fortran coarrays beyond 100k cores: 3D cellular automata</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">chemistry, biology and toxicology as related to environmental problems</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002112701</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:301</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.25</subfield><subfield code="j">Parallele Datenverarbeitung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">301</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399474 |