Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group
Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radio...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Lindsay, Holly B [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
9 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: My - Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER, 2019, London |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2022 ; number:8 ; pages:393-401 ; extent:9 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV058432558 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV058432558 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626050849.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV058432558 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
084 | |a 35.70 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 42.12 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lindsay, Holly B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 9 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. | ||
520 | |a Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Massimino, Maura |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Avula, Shivaram |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Stivaros, Stavros |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Grundy, Richard |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Metrock, Katie |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bhatia, Aashim |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chiapparini, Luisa |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bennett, Jeffrey |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wright, Karen |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hoffman, Lindsey M |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Smith, Amy |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pajtler, Kristian W |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Poussaint, Tina Young |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Warren, Katherine E |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Foreman, Nicholas K |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mirsky, David M |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n The Lancet Publ. Group |a Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER |t My |d 2019 |g London |w (DE-627)ELV003173852 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g pages:393-401 |g extent:9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
936 | b | k | |a 35.70 |j Biochemie: Allgemeines |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 42.12 |j Biophysik |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 23 |j 2022 |e 8 |h 393-401 |g 9 |y 23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.) |
author_variant |
h b l hb hbl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
lindsayhollybmassiminomauraavulashivaram:2022----:epnesesetnadarcnrcailpnyoaeomnainfoteepnesesetnei |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
35.70 42.12 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica (DE-627)ELV058432558 (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Lindsay, Holly B verfasserin aut Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group 2022transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Massimino, Maura oth Avula, Shivaram oth Stivaros, Stavros oth Grundy, Richard oth Metrock, Katie oth Bhatia, Aashim oth Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana oth Chiapparini, Luisa oth Bennett, Jeffrey oth Wright, Karen oth Hoffman, Lindsey M oth Smith, Amy oth Pajtler, Kristian W oth Poussaint, Tina Young oth Warren, Katherine E oth Foreman, Nicholas K oth Mirsky, David M oth Enthalten in The Lancet Publ. Group Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER My 2019 London (DE-627)ELV003173852 volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 23 2022 8 393-401 9 23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.) |
spelling |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica (DE-627)ELV058432558 (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Lindsay, Holly B verfasserin aut Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group 2022transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Massimino, Maura oth Avula, Shivaram oth Stivaros, Stavros oth Grundy, Richard oth Metrock, Katie oth Bhatia, Aashim oth Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana oth Chiapparini, Luisa oth Bennett, Jeffrey oth Wright, Karen oth Hoffman, Lindsey M oth Smith, Amy oth Pajtler, Kristian W oth Poussaint, Tina Young oth Warren, Katherine E oth Foreman, Nicholas K oth Mirsky, David M oth Enthalten in The Lancet Publ. Group Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER My 2019 London (DE-627)ELV003173852 volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 23 2022 8 393-401 9 23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.) |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica (DE-627)ELV058432558 (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Lindsay, Holly B verfasserin aut Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group 2022transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Massimino, Maura oth Avula, Shivaram oth Stivaros, Stavros oth Grundy, Richard oth Metrock, Katie oth Bhatia, Aashim oth Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana oth Chiapparini, Luisa oth Bennett, Jeffrey oth Wright, Karen oth Hoffman, Lindsey M oth Smith, Amy oth Pajtler, Kristian W oth Poussaint, Tina Young oth Warren, Katherine E oth Foreman, Nicholas K oth Mirsky, David M oth Enthalten in The Lancet Publ. Group Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER My 2019 London (DE-627)ELV003173852 volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 23 2022 8 393-401 9 23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.) |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica (DE-627)ELV058432558 (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Lindsay, Holly B verfasserin aut Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group 2022transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Massimino, Maura oth Avula, Shivaram oth Stivaros, Stavros oth Grundy, Richard oth Metrock, Katie oth Bhatia, Aashim oth Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana oth Chiapparini, Luisa oth Bennett, Jeffrey oth Wright, Karen oth Hoffman, Lindsey M oth Smith, Amy oth Pajtler, Kristian W oth Poussaint, Tina Young oth Warren, Katherine E oth Foreman, Nicholas K oth Mirsky, David M oth Enthalten in The Lancet Publ. Group Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER My 2019 London (DE-627)ELV003173852 volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 23 2022 8 393-401 9 23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.) |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica (DE-627)ELV058432558 (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Lindsay, Holly B verfasserin aut Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group 2022transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. Massimino, Maura oth Avula, Shivaram oth Stivaros, Stavros oth Grundy, Richard oth Metrock, Katie oth Bhatia, Aashim oth Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana oth Chiapparini, Luisa oth Bennett, Jeffrey oth Wright, Karen oth Hoffman, Lindsey M oth Smith, Amy oth Pajtler, Kristian W oth Poussaint, Tina Young oth Warren, Katherine E oth Foreman, Nicholas K oth Mirsky, David M oth Enthalten in The Lancet Publ. Group Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER My 2019 London (DE-627)ELV003173852 volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 35.70 Biochemie: Allgemeines VZ 42.12 Biophysik VZ AR 23 2022 8 393-401 9 23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.) |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in My London volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in My London volume:23 year:2022 number:8 pages:393-401 extent:9 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Biochemie: Allgemeines Biophysik |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
My |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Lindsay, Holly B @@aut@@ Massimino, Maura @@oth@@ Avula, Shivaram @@oth@@ Stivaros, Stavros @@oth@@ Grundy, Richard @@oth@@ Metrock, Katie @@oth@@ Bhatia, Aashim @@oth@@ Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana @@oth@@ Chiapparini, Luisa @@oth@@ Bennett, Jeffrey @@oth@@ Wright, Karen @@oth@@ Hoffman, Lindsey M @@oth@@ Smith, Amy @@oth@@ Pajtler, Kristian W @@oth@@ Poussaint, Tina Young @@oth@@ Warren, Katherine E @@oth@@ Foreman, Nicholas K @@oth@@ Mirsky, David M @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003173852 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
ELV058432558 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV058432558</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626050849.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV058432558</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lindsay, Holly B</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Massimino, Maura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avula, Shivaram</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stivaros, Stavros</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grundy, Richard</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Metrock, Katie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bhatia, Aashim</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chiapparini, Luisa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bennett, Jeffrey</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wright, Karen</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hoffman, Lindsey M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, Amy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pajtler, Kristian W</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poussaint, Tina Young</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Warren, Katherine E</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreman, Nicholas K</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mirsky, David M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">The Lancet Publ. Group</subfield><subfield code="a">Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">My</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="g">London</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003173852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:393-401</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="j">Biochemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Biophysik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">393-401</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield><subfield code="y">23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.)</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Lindsay, Holly B |
spellingShingle |
Lindsay, Holly B ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
authorStr |
Lindsay, Holly B |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003173852 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
topic |
ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 fid BIODIV bkl 35.70 bkl 42.12 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
m m mm s a sa s s ss r g rg k m km a b ab a f t aft l c lc j b jb k w kw l m h lm lmh a s as k w p kw kwp t y p ty typ k e w ke kew n k f nk nkf d m m dm dmm |
hierarchy_parent_title |
My |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003173852 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
hierarchy_top_title |
My |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003173852 |
title |
Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV058432558 (ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |
title_full |
Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
author_sort |
Lindsay, Holly B |
journal |
My |
journalStr |
My |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
393 |
author_browse |
Lindsay, Holly B |
container_volume |
23 |
physical |
9 |
class |
570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 35.70 bkl 42.12 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Lindsay, Holly B |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |
dewey-full |
570 |
title_sort |
response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology (rapno) working group |
title_auth |
Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
abstract |
Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. |
abstractGer |
Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
container_issue |
8 |
title_short |
Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Massimino, Maura Avula, Shivaram Stivaros, Stavros Grundy, Richard Metrock, Katie Bhatia, Aashim Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana Chiapparini, Luisa Bennett, Jeffrey Wright, Karen Hoffman, Lindsey M Smith, Amy Pajtler, Kristian W Poussaint, Tina Young Warren, Katherine E Foreman, Nicholas K Mirsky, David M |
author2Str |
Massimino, Maura Avula, Shivaram Stivaros, Stavros Grundy, Richard Metrock, Katie Bhatia, Aashim Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana Chiapparini, Luisa Bennett, Jeffrey Wright, Karen Hoffman, Lindsey M Smith, Amy Pajtler, Kristian W Poussaint, Tina Young Warren, Katherine E Foreman, Nicholas K Mirsky, David M |
ppnlink |
ELV003173852 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T19:00:03.836Z |
_version_ |
1803857327645786112 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV058432558</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626050849.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220808s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001961.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV058432558</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1470-2045(22)00222-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lindsay, Holly B</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Response criteria for paediatric intracranial ependymoma vary historically and across different international cooperative groups. The Response Assessment in the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group, consisting of an international panel of paediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, neuro-radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address both the issues and the unique challenges in assessing the response in children with CNS tumours. We established a subcommittee to develop response assessment criteria for paediatric ependymoma. Current practice and literature were reviewed to identify major challenges in assessing the response of paediatric ependymoma to clinical trial therapy. For areas in which data were scarce or unavailable, consensus was reached through an iterative process. RAPNO response assessment recommendations include assessing disease response on the basis of changes in tumour volume, and using event-free survival as a study endpoint for patients entering clinical trials without bulky disease. Our recommendations for response assessment include the use of brain and spine MRI, cerebral spinal fluid cytology, neurological examination, and steroid use. Baseline postoperative imaging to assess for residual tumour should be obtained 24–48 h after surgery. Our consensus recommendations and response definitions should be prospectively validated in clinical trials.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Massimino, Maura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avula, Shivaram</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stivaros, Stavros</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grundy, Richard</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Metrock, Katie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bhatia, Aashim</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chiapparini, Luisa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bennett, Jeffrey</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wright, Karen</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hoffman, Lindsey M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, Amy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pajtler, Kristian W</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Poussaint, Tina Young</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Warren, Katherine E</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreman, Nicholas K</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mirsky, David M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">The Lancet Publ. Group</subfield><subfield code="a">Citovsky, Vitaly ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">My</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="g">London</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003173852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:393-401</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00222-4</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.70</subfield><subfield code="j">Biochemie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Biophysik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">393-401</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield><subfield code="y">23.2022, 8, e393-, (9 S.)</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401184 |