Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey
Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enh...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Guo, Xiaojie [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
25 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis - Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER, 2013, an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:86 ; year:2022 ; pages:146-170 ; extent:25 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV058502157 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV058502157 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230626051015.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221103s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV058502157 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q VZ |
084 | |a 58.21 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Guo, Xiaojie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey |
264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 25 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. | ||
520 | |a Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Image dehazing |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Image restoration |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Image enhancement |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Image fusion |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Yang, Yang |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chaoyue |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ma, Jiayi |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER |t Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis |d 2013 |d an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003322297 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:86 |g year:2022 |g pages:146-170 |g extent:25 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
936 | b | k | |a 58.21 |j Brennstoffe |j Kraftstoffe |j Explosivstoffe |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 86 |j 2022 |h 146-170 |g 25 |
author_variant |
x g xg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
guoxiaojieyangyangwangchaoyuemajiayi:2022----:mgdhznvanacmnrsoain |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
58.21 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica (DE-627)ELV058502157 (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Guo, Xiaojie verfasserin aut Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey 2022transfer abstract 25 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Elsevier Yang, Yang oth Wang, Chaoyue oth Ma, Jiayi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis 2013 an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003322297 volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 86 2022 146-170 25 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica (DE-627)ELV058502157 (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Guo, Xiaojie verfasserin aut Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey 2022transfer abstract 25 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Elsevier Yang, Yang oth Wang, Chaoyue oth Ma, Jiayi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis 2013 an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003322297 volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 86 2022 146-170 25 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica (DE-627)ELV058502157 (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Guo, Xiaojie verfasserin aut Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey 2022transfer abstract 25 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Elsevier Yang, Yang oth Wang, Chaoyue oth Ma, Jiayi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis 2013 an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003322297 volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 86 2022 146-170 25 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica (DE-627)ELV058502157 (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Guo, Xiaojie verfasserin aut Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey 2022transfer abstract 25 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Elsevier Yang, Yang oth Wang, Chaoyue oth Ma, Jiayi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis 2013 an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003322297 volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 86 2022 146-170 25 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica (DE-627)ELV058502157 (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Guo, Xiaojie verfasserin aut Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey 2022transfer abstract 25 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Elsevier Yang, Yang oth Wang, Chaoyue oth Ma, Jiayi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis 2013 an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003322297 volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 86 2022 146-170 25 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:86 year:2022 pages:146-170 extent:25 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Image dehazing Image restoration Image enhancement Image fusion |
dewey-raw |
660 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Guo, Xiaojie @@aut@@ Yang, Yang @@oth@@ Wang, Chaoyue @@oth@@ Ma, Jiayi @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003322297 |
dewey-sort |
3660 |
id |
ELV058502157 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV058502157</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626051015.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221103s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV058502157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guo, Xiaojie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">25</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image dehazing</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image restoration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image enhancement</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image fusion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Yang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chaoyue</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ma, Jiayi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003322297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:86</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-170</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:25</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="j">Brennstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Kraftstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Explosivstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">86</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">146-170</subfield><subfield code="g">25</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Guo, Xiaojie |
spellingShingle |
Guo, Xiaojie ddc 660 bkl 58.21 Elsevier Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey |
authorStr |
Guo, Xiaojie |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003322297 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
660 - Chemical engineering |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
660 VZ 58.21 bkl Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 660 bkl 58.21 Elsevier Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 660 bkl 58.21 Elsevier Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion |
topic_browse |
ddc 660 bkl 58.21 Elsevier Image dehazing Elsevier Image restoration Elsevier Image enhancement Elsevier Image fusion |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
y y yy c w cw j m jm |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003322297 |
dewey-tens |
660 - Chemical engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003322297 |
title |
Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV058502157 (ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1 |
title_full |
Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey |
author_sort |
Guo, Xiaojie |
journal |
Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis |
journalStr |
Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
146 |
author_browse |
Guo, Xiaojie |
container_volume |
86 |
physical |
25 |
class |
660 VZ 58.21 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Guo, Xiaojie |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 |
dewey-full |
660 |
title_sort |
image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: a survey |
title_auth |
Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey |
abstract |
Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. |
abstractGer |
Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
title_short |
Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Yang, Yang Wang, Chaoyue Ma, Jiayi |
author2Str |
Yang, Yang Wang, Chaoyue Ma, Jiayi |
ppnlink |
ELV003322297 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T19:12:35.569Z |
_version_ |
1803858115893919746 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV058502157</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626051015.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221103s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001855.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV058502157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1566-2535(22)00064-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guo, Xiaojie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Image dehazing via enhancement, restoration, and fusion: A survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">25</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haze usually causes severe interference to image visibility. Such degradation on images troubles both human observers and computer vision systems. To seek high-quality images from degraded ones, a large number of image dehazing algorithms have been proposed from different perspectives like image enhancement, restoration, and fusion. Especially in recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, CNN-based methods have already dominated the mainstream of image dehazing and gained significant progress on benchmark datasets. This paper firstly presents a comprehensive survey of existing image dehazing methods, and then conducts both qualitative and quantitative comparisons among representative methods, from classic methods to recent advanced approaches. We expect the literature survey and benchmark analysis could help readers better understand the advantages and limitations of existing dehazing methods. Moreover, a discussion on possible trends in single image dehazing is put forward to innovate further works.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image dehazing</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image restoration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image enhancement</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Image fusion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang, Yang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chaoyue</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ma, Jiayi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Choi, Hong L. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Prediction of livestock manure and mixture higher heating value based on fundamental analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on multi-sensor, multi-source information fusion</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003322297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:86</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-170</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:25</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.005</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="j">Brennstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Kraftstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Explosivstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">86</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">146-170</subfield><subfield code="g">25</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400572 |