Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries
• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Markova, Liljana [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity |
|---|
| Umfang: |
4 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate - Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER, 2019, the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:277 ; year:2022 ; pages:53-56 ; extent:4 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV058944672 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV058944672 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626051916.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221103s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV058944672 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 590 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 12 |a 22 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 42.66 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Markova, Liljana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 4 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. | ||
| 520 | |a • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Labour analgesia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Epidural analgesia |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ten Group Classification System |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lucovnik, Miha |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Verdenik, Ivan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER |t Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate |d 2019 |d the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV00344807X |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:277 |g year:2022 |g pages:53-56 |g extent:4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.66 |j Ethologie |x Biologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 277 |j 2022 |h 53-56 |g 4 | ||
| author_variant |
l m lm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
markovaliljanalucovnikmihaverdenikivanst:2022----:eieyoennoaamriiyfermfnaiparpdrlnleiuightnruslsiiainytm5eri |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
42.66 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica (DE-627)ELV058944672 (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl Markova, Liljana verfasserin aut Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries 2022transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Elsevier Lucovnik, Miha oth Verdenik, Ivan oth Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate 2019 the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00344807X volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV 42.66 Ethologie Biologie VZ AR 277 2022 53-56 4 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica (DE-627)ELV058944672 (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl Markova, Liljana verfasserin aut Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries 2022transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Elsevier Lucovnik, Miha oth Verdenik, Ivan oth Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate 2019 the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00344807X volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV 42.66 Ethologie Biologie VZ AR 277 2022 53-56 4 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica (DE-627)ELV058944672 (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl Markova, Liljana verfasserin aut Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries 2022transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Elsevier Lucovnik, Miha oth Verdenik, Ivan oth Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate 2019 the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00344807X volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV 42.66 Ethologie Biologie VZ AR 277 2022 53-56 4 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica (DE-627)ELV058944672 (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl Markova, Liljana verfasserin aut Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries 2022transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Elsevier Lucovnik, Miha oth Verdenik, Ivan oth Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate 2019 the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00344807X volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV 42.66 Ethologie Biologie VZ AR 277 2022 53-56 4 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica (DE-627)ELV058944672 (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl Markova, Liljana verfasserin aut Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries 2022transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. • Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Elsevier Lucovnik, Miha oth Verdenik, Ivan oth Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate 2019 the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV00344807X volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV 42.66 Ethologie Biologie VZ AR 277 2022 53-56 4 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:277 year:2022 pages:53-56 extent:4 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Ethologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Labour analgesia Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Epidural analgesia Ten Group Classification System |
| dewey-raw |
590 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Markova, Liljana @@aut@@ Lucovnik, Miha @@oth@@ Verdenik, Ivan @@oth@@ Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV00344807X |
| dewey-sort |
3590 |
| id |
ELV058944672 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV058944672</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626051916.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221103s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV058944672</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">590</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="a">22</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.66</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Markova, Liljana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Labour analgesia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Epidural analgesia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ten Group Classification System</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lucovnik, Miha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Verdenik, Ivan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00344807X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:277</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:53-56</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.66</subfield><subfield code="j">Ethologie</subfield><subfield code="x">Biologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">277</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">53-56</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Markova, Liljana |
| spellingShingle |
Markova, Liljana ddc 590 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.66 Elsevier Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| authorStr |
Markova, Liljana |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV00344807X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
590 - Animals (Zoology) |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 590 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.66 Elsevier Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 590 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.66 Elsevier Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System |
| topic_browse |
ddc 590 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV bkl 42.66 Elsevier Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity Elsevier Labour analgesia Elsevier Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia Elsevier Epidural analgesia Elsevier Ten Group Classification System |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m l ml i v iv p t s pt pts |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV00344807X |
| dewey-tens |
590 - Animals (Zoology) |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV00344807X |
| title |
Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV058944672 (ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7 |
| title_full |
Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| author_sort |
Markova, Liljana |
| journal |
Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate |
| journalStr |
Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
53 |
| author_browse |
Markova, Liljana |
| container_volume |
277 |
| physical |
4 |
| class |
590 VZ 12 22 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid 42.66 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Markova, Liljana |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 |
| dewey-full |
590 |
| title_sort |
delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-pca or epidural analgesia using the ten groups classification system: a 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| title_auth |
Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| abstract |
• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. |
| abstractGer |
• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV |
| title_short |
Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Lucovnik, Miha Verdenik, Ivan Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana |
| author2Str |
Lucovnik, Miha Verdenik, Ivan Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana |
| ppnlink |
ELV00344807X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:30:54.069Z |
| _version_ |
1803863042630352896 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV058944672</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626051916.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221103s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001903.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV058944672</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-2115(22)00468-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">590</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="a">22</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.66</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Markova, Liljana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) were compared with respect to labour and delivery outcomes within four groups of the Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a). • Compared to EA, RPCA was associated with lower caesarean section rates and operative vaginal delivery rates in nulliparous women with spontaneous and induced labour (groups 1 and 2a) and in multiparous women with spontaneous onset of labour (group 3). • RPCA was associated with lower operative delivery rates with pathologic CTG in all four labour types (groups 1, 2a, 3, 4a) compared to EA. • No differences between RPCA and EA were recorded in APGAR < 7 at 5 min, perinatal asphyxia, and NICU admissions within any of the TGCS groups. • RPCA could be used for labour analgesia on a routine basis if strict adherence to protocols is ensured and regular staff training is provided.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Caesarean section, Neonatal morbidity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Labour analgesia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Epidural analgesia</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ten Group Classification System</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lucovnik, Miha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Verdenik, Ivan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stopar Pintarič, Tatjana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Haddy, Emily ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Shelter seeking behaviour of healthy donkeys and mules in a hot climate</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV00344807X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:277</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:53-56</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.66</subfield><subfield code="j">Ethologie</subfield><subfield code="x">Biologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">277</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">53-56</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397518 |