Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas
The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiver...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ruskule, Anda [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA - Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER, 2022, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:147 ; year:2023 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV059670045 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV059670045 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626053610.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221219s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV059670045 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.87 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ruskule, Anda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. | ||
| 520 | |a The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a The Baltic Sea |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Green infrastructure |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Maritime |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ecosystem services |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Maritime spatial planning |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ecological value |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kotta, Jonne |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Saha, Champa Rani |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arndt, Philipp |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ustups, Didzis |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Strāķe, Solvita |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bergström, Lena |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER |t A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA |d 2022 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV008006881 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:147 |g year:2023 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.87 |j Gastroenterologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 147 |j 2023 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
a r ar |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
ruskuleandakottajonnesahachamparaniarndt:2023----:etnteocpogennrsrcuethblisacltspotncssebsdp |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.87 |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica (DE-627)ELV059670045 (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.87 bkl Ruskule, Anda verfasserin aut Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas 2023transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Elsevier Kotta, Jonne oth Saha, Champa Rani oth Arndt, Philipp oth Ustups, Didzis oth Strāķe, Solvita oth Bergström, Lena oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008006881 volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.87 Gastroenterologie VZ AR 147 2023 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica (DE-627)ELV059670045 (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.87 bkl Ruskule, Anda verfasserin aut Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas 2023transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Elsevier Kotta, Jonne oth Saha, Champa Rani oth Arndt, Philipp oth Ustups, Didzis oth Strāķe, Solvita oth Bergström, Lena oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008006881 volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.87 Gastroenterologie VZ AR 147 2023 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica (DE-627)ELV059670045 (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.87 bkl Ruskule, Anda verfasserin aut Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas 2023transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Elsevier Kotta, Jonne oth Saha, Champa Rani oth Arndt, Philipp oth Ustups, Didzis oth Strāķe, Solvita oth Bergström, Lena oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008006881 volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.87 Gastroenterologie VZ AR 147 2023 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica (DE-627)ELV059670045 (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.87 bkl Ruskule, Anda verfasserin aut Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas 2023transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Elsevier Kotta, Jonne oth Saha, Champa Rani oth Arndt, Philipp oth Ustups, Didzis oth Strāķe, Solvita oth Bergström, Lena oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008006881 volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.87 Gastroenterologie VZ AR 147 2023 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica (DE-627)ELV059670045 (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.87 bkl Ruskule, Anda verfasserin aut Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas 2023transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Elsevier Kotta, Jonne oth Saha, Champa Rani oth Arndt, Philipp oth Ustups, Didzis oth Strāķe, Solvita oth Bergström, Lena oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV008006881 volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.87 Gastroenterologie VZ AR 147 2023 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:147 year:2023 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Gastroenterologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
The Baltic Sea Green infrastructure Maritime Ecosystem services Maritime spatial planning Ecological value |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ruskule, Anda @@aut@@ Kotta, Jonne @@oth@@ Saha, Champa Rani @@oth@@ Arndt, Philipp @@oth@@ Ustups, Didzis @@oth@@ Strāķe, Solvita @@oth@@ Bergström, Lena @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008006881 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV059670045 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV059670045</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626053610.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221219s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV059670045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ruskule, Anda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">The Baltic Sea</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Green infrastructure</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Maritime</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem services</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Maritime spatial planning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecological value</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kotta, Jonne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saha, Champa Rani</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arndt, Philipp</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ustups, Didzis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strāķe, Solvita</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bergström, Lena</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008006881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:147</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="j">Gastroenterologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">147</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ruskule, Anda |
| spellingShingle |
Ruskule, Anda ddc 610 bkl 44.87 Elsevier The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| authorStr |
Ruskule, Anda |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008006881 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 44.87 bkl Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.87 Elsevier The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.87 Elsevier The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.87 Elsevier The Baltic Sea Elsevier Green infrastructure Elsevier Maritime Elsevier Ecosystem services Elsevier Maritime spatial planning Elsevier Ecological value |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j k jk c r s cr crs p a pa d u du s s ss l b lb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008006881 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008006881 |
| title |
Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV059670045 (ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3 |
| title_full |
Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| author_sort |
Ruskule, Anda |
| journal |
A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA |
| journalStr |
A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Ruskule, Anda |
| container_volume |
147 |
| class |
610 VZ 44.87 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ruskule, Anda |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
testing the concept of green infrastructure at the baltic sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| title_auth |
Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| abstract |
The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. |
| abstractGer |
The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Kotta, Jonne Saha, Champa Rani Arndt, Philipp Ustups, Didzis Strāķe, Solvita Bergström, Lena |
| author2Str |
Kotta, Jonne Saha, Champa Rani Arndt, Philipp Ustups, Didzis Strāķe, Solvita Bergström, Lena |
| ppnlink |
ELV008006881 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:41:56.646Z |
| _version_ |
1803871287139893248 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV059670045</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626053610.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221219s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001992.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV059670045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0308-597X(22)00421-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ruskule, Anda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Testing the concept of green infrastructure at the Baltic Sea scale to support an ecosystem-based approach to management of marine areas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) can facilitate integration of ecological considerations and ecosystem service mapping into spatial planning. GI has been introduced in EU policy as a key tool for implementing the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 on halting the loss of biodiversity as well as addressing other global environmental problems. Unlike terrestrial ecosystems, mapping of marine GI is still in infancy. Here, application of GI concept in mapping was developed and tested for a large marine region, the Baltic Sea, using existing regional spatial data sets on the distribution of different ecosystem components. Using a qualitative valuation approach, experts assessed 36 marine ecosystem components with respect to their relevance for six ecological value criteria and ten ecosystem services. Then, maps representing the ecological value of Baltic Sea ecosystems and their potential supply of ecosystem services were developed based on a hierarchical aggregation structure, designed to avoid double-counting of features that appeared in many data layers. Finally, results of the ecological value and ecosystem service supply mapping were integrated into the marine GI map. These pioneering results are used to discuss how marine GI mapping can support the ecosystem-based approach in MSP, by improving the knowledge base on the roles and connectedness of ecosystem components. Applied at the transboundary regional scale, as here, the GI concept can support cross-border coherence in spatial planning and provide practical management solutions to improve connectivity and functioning of MPA networks, or develop sustainable planning solutions of marine space.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">The Baltic Sea</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Green infrastructure</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Maritime</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem services</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Maritime spatial planning</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ecological value</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kotta, Jonne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saha, Champa Rani</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arndt, Philipp</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ustups, Didzis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strāķe, Solvita</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bergström, Lena</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Greaves, Grant E. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">A CANADIAN RETROSPECTIVE COHORT REVIEW OF 2,233 PATIENTS COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008006881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:147</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105374</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.87</subfield><subfield code="j">Gastroenterologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">147</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4006987 |