Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation
Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adop...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Huang, Lingling [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial - Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER, 2022, London |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:84 ; year:2022 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV059801131 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV059801131 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230626054015.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221219s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV059801131 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.92 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Huang, Lingling |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022transfer abstract | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. | ||
| 520 | |a Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Pre-registration |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Scope of justice |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Carbon allocation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Humanization |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Climate justice |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Li |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dang, Jianning |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wei, Cong |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liang, Yuan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gu, Zibei |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Jinfeng |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Academic Press |a Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER |t Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial |d 2022 |g London |w (DE-627)ELV008779090 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:84 |g year:2022 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.92 |j Gynäkologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 84 |j 2022 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
l h lh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
huanglinglingliulidangjianningweiconglia:2022----:uaiainfugoppooejsiena |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.92 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica (DE-627)ELV059801131 (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.92 bkl Huang, Lingling verfasserin aut Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Elsevier Liu, Li oth Dang, Jianning oth Wei, Cong oth Liang, Yuan oth Gu, Zibei oth Li, Jinfeng oth Enthalten in Academic Press Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial 2022 London (DE-627)ELV008779090 volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.92 Gynäkologie VZ AR 84 2022 0 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica (DE-627)ELV059801131 (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.92 bkl Huang, Lingling verfasserin aut Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Elsevier Liu, Li oth Dang, Jianning oth Wei, Cong oth Liang, Yuan oth Gu, Zibei oth Li, Jinfeng oth Enthalten in Academic Press Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial 2022 London (DE-627)ELV008779090 volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.92 Gynäkologie VZ AR 84 2022 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica (DE-627)ELV059801131 (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.92 bkl Huang, Lingling verfasserin aut Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Elsevier Liu, Li oth Dang, Jianning oth Wei, Cong oth Liang, Yuan oth Gu, Zibei oth Li, Jinfeng oth Enthalten in Academic Press Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial 2022 London (DE-627)ELV008779090 volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.92 Gynäkologie VZ AR 84 2022 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica (DE-627)ELV059801131 (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.92 bkl Huang, Lingling verfasserin aut Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Elsevier Liu, Li oth Dang, Jianning oth Wei, Cong oth Liang, Yuan oth Gu, Zibei oth Li, Jinfeng oth Enthalten in Academic Press Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial 2022 London (DE-627)ELV008779090 volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.92 Gynäkologie VZ AR 84 2022 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica (DE-627)ELV059801131 (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.92 bkl Huang, Lingling verfasserin aut Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation 2022transfer abstract nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Elsevier Liu, Li oth Dang, Jianning oth Wei, Cong oth Liang, Yuan oth Gu, Zibei oth Li, Jinfeng oth Enthalten in Academic Press Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial 2022 London (DE-627)ELV008779090 volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.92 Gynäkologie VZ AR 84 2022 0 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial London volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial London volume:84 year:2022 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Gynäkologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Pre-registration Scope of justice Carbon allocation Humanization Climate justice |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Huang, Lingling @@aut@@ Liu, Li @@oth@@ Dang, Jianning @@oth@@ Wei, Cong @@oth@@ Liang, Yuan @@oth@@ Gu, Zibei @@oth@@ Li, Jinfeng @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008779090 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV059801131 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV059801131</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626054015.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221219s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV059801131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.92</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Lingling</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pre-registration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Scope of justice</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Carbon allocation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Humanization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Climate justice</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Li</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dang, Jianning</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei, Cong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liang, Yuan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Zibei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Jinfeng</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">London</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008779090</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:84</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.92</subfield><subfield code="j">Gynäkologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">84</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Huang, Lingling |
| spellingShingle |
Huang, Lingling ddc 610 bkl 44.92 Elsevier Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| authorStr |
Huang, Lingling |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008779090 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 VZ 44.92 bkl Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.92 Elsevier Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.92 Elsevier Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.92 Elsevier Pre-registration Elsevier Scope of justice Elsevier Carbon allocation Elsevier Humanization Elsevier Climate justice |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
l l ll j d jd c w cw y l yl z g zg j l jl |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008779090 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008779090 |
| title |
Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV059801131 (ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6 |
| title_full |
Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| author_sort |
Huang, Lingling |
| journal |
Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial |
| journalStr |
Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Huang, Lingling |
| container_volume |
84 |
| class |
610 VZ 44.92 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Huang, Lingling |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| title_sort |
humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| title_auth |
Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| abstract |
Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. |
| abstractGer |
Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Liu, Li Dang, Jianning Wei, Cong Liang, Yuan Gu, Zibei Li, Jinfeng |
| author2Str |
Liu, Li Dang, Jianning Wei, Cong Liang, Yuan Gu, Zibei Li, Jinfeng |
| ppnlink |
ELV008779090 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T23:05:43.750Z |
| _version_ |
1803872783565848576 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV059801131</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230626054015.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221219s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001987.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV059801131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0272-4944(22)00156-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.92</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Lingling</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Humanization of outgroups promotes justice in carbon allocation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Understanding the underpinnings of climate justice, especially justice in carbon allocation, is paramount for international cooperation in coping with climate change. Previous work has attempted to promote carbon allocation justice based on a utilitarian theory of justice, but it has backfired. Adopting the per capita approach in defining justice suggested by a Rawlsian theory of justice, the current research addresses the psychosocial processes underlying justice in carbon allocation. Inspired by the social identity approach, we propose that whether people choose to behave justly in carbon allocation originates, in part, from their perceptions about whether an outgroup shares similar humanness with the ingroup. We conducted four studies (N = 1326) to test this assumption. The results indicated that humanization increased the allocation of carbon credits to an outgroup (Study 1), increased the amount of carbon credits contributed and decreased free-riding behavior (Studies 2 & 3), and reduced carbon emissions and over-emitting behavior (Study 4) in carbon allocation; the effects were mediated by an expanded scope of justice (Studies 1–4). By identifying the roles of humanization and the scope of justice in carbon allocation justice, this research provides a psychosocial framework for understanding climate justice, which has implications for guiding the priorities of policymakers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pre-registration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Scope of justice</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Carbon allocation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Humanization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Climate justice</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Li</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dang, Jianning</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei, Cong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liang, Yuan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Zibei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Jinfeng</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Kangasniemi, Marika H ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of estradiol- and ethinylestradiol-based contraceptives on adrenal steroids: A randomized trial</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">London</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008779090</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:84</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101911</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.92</subfield><subfield code="j">Gynäkologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">84</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4016 |