Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile

There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés [verfasserIn] LeQuesne, Carlos [verfasserIn] Rozas, Vicente [verfasserIn] Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania [verfasserIn] González-Reyes, Álvaro [verfasserIn] Copenheaver, Carolyn A. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Dendrochronologia - Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002, 80
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:80

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113

Katalog-ID:	ELV060977477

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV060977477
003	DE-627
005	20230926164228.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230729s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV060977477
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 930 \|q VZ
084			\|a 15.15 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Rojas-Badilla, Moisés \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate.
650		4	\|a Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology
650		4	\|a South America
650		4	\|a South-temperate forests
650		4	\|a Podocarpaceae
700	1		\|a LeQuesne, Carlos \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Rozas, Vicente \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a González-Reyes, Álvaro \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Copenheaver, Carolyn A. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Dendrochronologia \|d Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002 \|g 80 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)354193066 \|w (DE-600)2088117-4 \|w (DE-576)259272523 \|x 1612-0051 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:80
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a SSG-OPC-ANG
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 15.15 \|j Archäologie \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 80

Indexfelder

author_variant	m r b mrb c l cl v r vr t g z tgz á g r ágr c a c ca cac
matchkey_str	article:16120051:2023----::pceseiiifunefyrciaeneodrgototreoxsigoiesntmea
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	15.15
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113 doi (DE-627)ELV060977477 (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 930 VZ 15.15 bkl Rojas-Badilla, Moisés verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280 aut Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate. Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae LeQuesne, Carlos verfasserin aut Rozas, Vicente verfasserin aut Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania verfasserin aut González-Reyes, Álvaro verfasserin aut Copenheaver, Carolyn A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Dendrochronologia Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002 80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)354193066 (DE-600)2088117-4 (DE-576)259272523 1612-0051 nnns volume:80 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 15.15 Archäologie VZ AR 80
spelling	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113 doi (DE-627)ELV060977477 (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 930 VZ 15.15 bkl Rojas-Badilla, Moisés verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280 aut Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate. Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae LeQuesne, Carlos verfasserin aut Rozas, Vicente verfasserin aut Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania verfasserin aut González-Reyes, Álvaro verfasserin aut Copenheaver, Carolyn A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Dendrochronologia Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002 80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)354193066 (DE-600)2088117-4 (DE-576)259272523 1612-0051 nnns volume:80 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 15.15 Archäologie VZ AR 80
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113 doi (DE-627)ELV060977477 (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 930 VZ 15.15 bkl Rojas-Badilla, Moisés verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280 aut Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate. Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae LeQuesne, Carlos verfasserin aut Rozas, Vicente verfasserin aut Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania verfasserin aut González-Reyes, Álvaro verfasserin aut Copenheaver, Carolyn A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Dendrochronologia Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002 80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)354193066 (DE-600)2088117-4 (DE-576)259272523 1612-0051 nnns volume:80 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 15.15 Archäologie VZ AR 80
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113 doi (DE-627)ELV060977477 (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 930 VZ 15.15 bkl Rojas-Badilla, Moisés verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280 aut Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate. Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae LeQuesne, Carlos verfasserin aut Rozas, Vicente verfasserin aut Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania verfasserin aut González-Reyes, Álvaro verfasserin aut Copenheaver, Carolyn A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Dendrochronologia Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002 80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)354193066 (DE-600)2088117-4 (DE-576)259272523 1612-0051 nnns volume:80 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 15.15 Archäologie VZ AR 80
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113 doi (DE-627)ELV060977477 (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 930 VZ 15.15 bkl Rojas-Badilla, Moisés verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280 aut Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate. Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae LeQuesne, Carlos verfasserin aut Rozas, Vicente verfasserin aut Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania verfasserin aut González-Reyes, Álvaro verfasserin aut Copenheaver, Carolyn A. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Dendrochronologia Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002 80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)354193066 (DE-600)2088117-4 (DE-576)259272523 1612-0051 nnns volume:80 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 15.15 Archäologie VZ AR 80
language	English
source	Enthalten in Dendrochronologia 80 volume:80
sourceStr	Enthalten in Dendrochronologia 80 volume:80
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Archäologie
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae
dewey-raw	930
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Dendrochronologia
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés @@aut@@ LeQuesne, Carlos @@aut@@ Rozas, Vicente @@aut@@ Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania @@aut@@ González-Reyes, Álvaro @@aut@@ Copenheaver, Carolyn A. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	354193066
dewey-sort	3930
id	ELV060977477
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV060977477</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230926164228.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230729s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV060977477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">930</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15.15</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rojas-Badilla, Moisés</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">South America</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">South-temperate forests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Podocarpaceae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LeQuesne, Carlos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rozas, Vicente</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">González-Reyes, Álvaro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Copenheaver, Carolyn A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Dendrochronologia</subfield><subfield code="d">Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">80</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)354193066</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2088117-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259272523</subfield><subfield code="x">1612-0051</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">15.15</subfield><subfield code="j">Archäologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">80</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés
spellingShingle	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés ddc 930 bkl 15.15 misc Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology misc South America misc South-temperate forests misc Podocarpaceae Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile
authorStr	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)354193066
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	930 - History of ancient world to ca. 499
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1612-0051
topic_title	930 VZ 15.15 bkl Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology South America South-temperate forests Podocarpaceae
topic	ddc 930 bkl 15.15 misc Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology misc South America misc South-temperate forests misc Podocarpaceae
topic_unstemmed	ddc 930 bkl 15.15 misc Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology misc South America misc South-temperate forests misc Podocarpaceae
topic_browse	ddc 930 bkl 15.15 misc Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology misc South America misc South-temperate forests misc Podocarpaceae
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Dendrochronologia
hierarchy_parent_id	354193066
dewey-tens	930 - History of ancient world (to ca. 499)
hierarchy_top_title	Dendrochronologia
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)354193066 (DE-600)2088117-4 (DE-576)259272523
title	Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV060977477 (ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2
title_full	Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile
author_sort	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés
journal	Dendrochronologia
journalStr	Dendrochronologia
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	900 - History & geography
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés LeQuesne, Carlos Rozas, Vicente Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania González-Reyes, Álvaro Copenheaver, Carolyn A.
container_volume	80
class	930 VZ 15.15 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Rojas-Badilla, Moisés
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-1101-2280
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280
dewey-full	930
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate andean forest in south-central chile
title_auth	Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile
abstract	There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate.
abstractGer	There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate.
abstract_unstemmed	There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile
remote_bool	true
author2	LeQuesne, Carlos Rozas, Vicente Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania González-Reyes, Álvaro Copenheaver, Carolyn A.
author2Str	LeQuesne, Carlos Rozas, Vicente Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania González-Reyes, Álvaro Copenheaver, Carolyn A.
ppnlink	354193066
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113
up_date	2024-07-06T17:03:56.927Z
_version_	1803850022315360256
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV060977477</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230926164228.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230729s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.dendro.2023.126113</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV060977477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1125-7865(23)00063-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">930</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15.15</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rojas-Badilla, Moisés</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1101-2280</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is limited knowledge on the growth responses of coexisting conifer species to water conditions in the Andean region of South America- particularly in South-Central Chile (37°−40°S) where high temperatures and drought risk is expected to increase in the future. Here, we used wood cores from living trees and cross-sections of stumps to study the secondary growth responses to hydroclimatic environmental variables in Araucaria araucana, Austrocedrus chilensis and Prumnopitys andina, three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest. The standardized tree-ring chronologies are robust and have been well replicated over the past two centuries, with an expressed population signal greater than 0.90. Our findings indicate that chronologies of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys were quite similar, while Araucaria was almost independent. The secondary growth of Araucaria was negatively related to August precipitation and river runoff, likely due to a high probability of snow cover at high elevations in winter. In contrast, the secondary growth of Austrocedrus and Prumnopitys was positively associated with precipitation and streamflow and negatively with high maximum temperatures in two seasons, summer (December to February) and autumn (April to May). Prumnopitys growth was strongly associated with streamflow during last year´s and current year´s growing seasons. In the years 1962, 1998 and 2008 there occurred severe droughts, which were associated with growth reductions in the three conifers. Araucaria growth showed the greatest resistance to drought, while Austrocedrus was the most resilient to drought and showed the greatest ability for growth recovery after a drought. Araucaria growth showed near-constant resistance, recovery and resilience to drought during the study period, while Austrocedrus growth showed high recovery and resilience after the 1962 and 2008 droughts. Our results revealed contrasting behavior of coexisting conifers with respect to hydroclimate, which could help predict future changes in the performance of temperate Andean forests in a potentially drier and warmer climate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, dendroclimatology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">South America</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">South-temperate forests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Podocarpaceae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LeQuesne, Carlos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rozas, Vicente</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gipoulou-Zúñiga, Tania</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">González-Reyes, Álvaro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Copenheaver, Carolyn A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Dendrochronologia</subfield><subfield code="d">Jena : Urban & Fischer, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">80</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)354193066</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2088117-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259272523</subfield><subfield code="x">1612-0051</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:80</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">15.15</subfield><subfield code="j">Archäologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">80</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401867

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Species-specific influence of hydroclimate on secondary growth of three coexisting conifers in a temperate Andean forest in south-central Chile

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?