Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods

Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Zhang, Bochao [verfasserIn] Cui, Yuanlai [verfasserIn] Luo, Junzhe [verfasserIn] Wang, Jiaer [verfasserIn] Liao, Bin [verfasserIn] Tang, Chi [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of hydrology - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963, 620
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:620

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531

Katalog-ID:	ELV063126486

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV063126486
003	DE-627
005	20230928125046.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230908s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV063126486
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 690 \|q VZ
084			\|a 38.85 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Zhang, Bochao \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely.
650		4	\|a Wetland
650		4	\|a Tracer test
650		4	\|a Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis
650		4	\|a Moment index
650		4	\|a RTD modeling
650		4	\|a Rational function
700	1		\|a Cui, Yuanlai \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Luo, Junzhe \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Wang, Jiaer \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Liao, Bin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Tang, Chi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of hydrology \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963 \|g 620 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)268761817 \|w (DE-600)1473173-3 \|w (DE-576)077610628 \|x 1879-2707 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:620
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a SSG-OPC-GGO
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 38.85 \|j Hydrologie: Allgemeines \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 620

Indexfelder

author_variant	b z bz y c yc j l jl j w jw b l bl c t ct
matchkey_str	article:18792707:2023----::vlainnipoeetfeiectmdsrbt
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	38.85
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531 doi (DE-627)ELV063126486 (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.85 bkl Zhang, Bochao verfasserin aut Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely. Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function Cui, Yuanlai verfasserin aut Luo, Junzhe verfasserin aut Wang, Jiaer verfasserin aut Liao, Bin verfasserin aut Tang, Chi verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of hydrology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963 620 Online-Ressource (DE-627)268761817 (DE-600)1473173-3 (DE-576)077610628 1879-2707 nnns volume:620 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.85 Hydrologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 620
spelling	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531 doi (DE-627)ELV063126486 (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.85 bkl Zhang, Bochao verfasserin aut Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely. Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function Cui, Yuanlai verfasserin aut Luo, Junzhe verfasserin aut Wang, Jiaer verfasserin aut Liao, Bin verfasserin aut Tang, Chi verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of hydrology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963 620 Online-Ressource (DE-627)268761817 (DE-600)1473173-3 (DE-576)077610628 1879-2707 nnns volume:620 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.85 Hydrologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 620
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531 doi (DE-627)ELV063126486 (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.85 bkl Zhang, Bochao verfasserin aut Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely. Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function Cui, Yuanlai verfasserin aut Luo, Junzhe verfasserin aut Wang, Jiaer verfasserin aut Liao, Bin verfasserin aut Tang, Chi verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of hydrology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963 620 Online-Ressource (DE-627)268761817 (DE-600)1473173-3 (DE-576)077610628 1879-2707 nnns volume:620 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.85 Hydrologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 620
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531 doi (DE-627)ELV063126486 (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.85 bkl Zhang, Bochao verfasserin aut Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely. Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function Cui, Yuanlai verfasserin aut Luo, Junzhe verfasserin aut Wang, Jiaer verfasserin aut Liao, Bin verfasserin aut Tang, Chi verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of hydrology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963 620 Online-Ressource (DE-627)268761817 (DE-600)1473173-3 (DE-576)077610628 1879-2707 nnns volume:620 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.85 Hydrologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 620
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531 doi (DE-627)ELV063126486 (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.85 bkl Zhang, Bochao verfasserin aut Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely. Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function Cui, Yuanlai verfasserin aut Luo, Junzhe verfasserin aut Wang, Jiaer verfasserin aut Liao, Bin verfasserin aut Tang, Chi verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of hydrology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963 620 Online-Ressource (DE-627)268761817 (DE-600)1473173-3 (DE-576)077610628 1879-2707 nnns volume:620 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.85 Hydrologie: Allgemeines VZ AR 620
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of hydrology 620 volume:620
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of hydrology 620 volume:620
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Hydrologie: Allgemeines
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function
dewey-raw	690
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of hydrology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Zhang, Bochao @@aut@@ Cui, Yuanlai @@aut@@ Luo, Junzhe @@aut@@ Wang, Jiaer @@aut@@ Liao, Bin @@aut@@ Tang, Chi @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	268761817
dewey-sort	3690
id	ELV063126486
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV063126486</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230928125046.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230908s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV063126486</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Bochao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wetland</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tracer test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moment index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">RTD modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rational function</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cui, Yuanlai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luo, Junzhe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Jiaer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liao, Bin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tang, Chi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of hydrology</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963</subfield><subfield code="g">620</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)268761817</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473173-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)077610628</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-2707</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="j">Hydrologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">620</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Zhang, Bochao
spellingShingle	Zhang, Bochao ddc 690 bkl 38.85 misc Wetland misc Tracer test misc Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis misc Moment index misc RTD modeling misc Rational function Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
authorStr	Zhang, Bochao
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)268761817
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	690 - Buildings
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1879-2707
topic_title	690 VZ 38.85 bkl Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods Wetland Tracer test Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis Moment index RTD modeling Rational function
topic	ddc 690 bkl 38.85 misc Wetland misc Tracer test misc Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis misc Moment index misc RTD modeling misc Rational function
topic_unstemmed	ddc 690 bkl 38.85 misc Wetland misc Tracer test misc Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis misc Moment index misc RTD modeling misc Rational function
topic_browse	ddc 690 bkl 38.85 misc Wetland misc Tracer test misc Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis misc Moment index misc RTD modeling misc Rational function
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of hydrology
hierarchy_parent_id	268761817
dewey-tens	690 - Building & construction
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of hydrology
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)268761817 (DE-600)1473173-3 (DE-576)077610628
title	Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV063126486 (ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0
title_full	Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
author_sort	Zhang, Bochao
journal	Journal of hydrology
journalStr	Journal of hydrology
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Zhang, Bochao Cui, Yuanlai Luo, Junzhe Wang, Jiaer Liao, Bin Tang, Chi
container_volume	620
class	690 VZ 38.85 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Zhang, Bochao
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531
dewey-full	690
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
title_auth	Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
abstract	Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely.
abstractGer	Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely.
abstract_unstemmed	Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods
remote_bool	true
author2	Cui, Yuanlai Luo, Junzhe Wang, Jiaer Liao, Bin Tang, Chi
author2Str	Cui, Yuanlai Luo, Junzhe Wang, Jiaer Liao, Bin Tang, Chi
ppnlink	268761817
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531
up_date	2024-07-06T19:26:17.505Z
_version_	1803858977757331456
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV063126486</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230928125046.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230908s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129531</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV063126486</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-1694(23)00473-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Bochao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although residence time distributions (RTDs) are frequently used in wetland studies, there is no consensus about the analysis method. Generally, two types of methods can be used to analyze RTD data: the method of moments and the RTD modeling method. RTD curves are obtained by tracer tests. The real RTD curves are usually imperfect due to the presence of random measurement errors, the unreasonable sampling intervals, and the premature termination of the tracer test. This study aims to find a better RTD analysis method providing robust results under these unfavorable factors, which includes: (i) evaluating the existing RTD analysis methods; (ii) improving the existing RTD analysis method using the Rational model. The influence of measurement error, sampling interval, and ending time in tracer tests on RTD analysis methods was first simulated. The results showed that effective volume ratio was a preferable indicator compared with the variance of RTD. The stability of the moment method decreased with the increase of the measurement error and sampling interval, and the accuracy of the moment method decreased with the decrease of the test time. Although the RTD modeling method showed better stability and accuracy, the implicit premise is that the RTD model adequately describes the observed data. Further, 36 observed RTD data sets were used to test the Tanks in Series (TIS) model and the empirical Rational model. The results showed that the widely used TIS model was only effective in partial cases, while the newly proposed Rational model showed broader applicability. Both the moment method and the TIS modeling method were proven to be inadequate. Finally, the moment method was improved by using Rational models to pre-process RTD data. Although the improved method is still affected by random measurement errors, it can significantly increase the accuracy of the moment method when sampling points are small or the test ends prematurely.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wetland</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tracer test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residence time distribution (RTD) analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moment index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">RTD modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rational function</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cui, Yuanlai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luo, Junzhe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Jiaer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liao, Bin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tang, Chi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of hydrology</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1963</subfield><subfield code="g">620</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)268761817</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473173-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)077610628</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-2707</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="j">Hydrologie: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">620</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4013834

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Evaluation and improvement of residence time distribution analysis methods

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?