Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures

Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Mocelin, Douglas Martins [verfasserIn] Isied, Mayzan Maher [verfasserIn] Castorena, Cassie [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of cleaner production - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993, 426
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:426

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156

Katalog-ID:	ELV065146581

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV065146581
003	DE-627
005	20231210093148.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	231015s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV065146581
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 690 \|a 330 \|q VZ
084			\|a 43.35 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 85.35 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Mocelin, Douglas Martins \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate.
650		4	\|a Asphalt mixtures
650		4	\|a Volumetric properties
650		4	\|a Recycled asphalt pavement
650		4	\|a Recycled asphalt shingles
650		4	\|a Recycled binder availability
700	1		\|a Isied, Mayzan Maher \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Castorena, Cassie \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084 \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of cleaner production \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993 \|g 426 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)324655878 \|w (DE-600)2029338-0 \|w (DE-576)252613988 \|x 0959-6526 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:426
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a SSG-OPC-GGO
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 43.35 \|j Umweltrichtlinien \|j Umweltnormen \|q VZ
936	b	k	\|a 85.35 \|j Fertigung \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 426

Indexfelder

author_variant	d m m dm dmm m m i mm mmi c c cc
matchkey_str	article:09596526:2023----::nlecorcamdshlpvmnrpnrcceapathnlrsidrviaiiyn
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	43.35 85.35
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156 doi (DE-627)ELV065146581 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl Mocelin, Douglas Martins verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 aut Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate. Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability Isied, Mayzan Maher verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 aut Castorena, Cassie verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084 aut Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993 426 Online-Ressource (DE-627)324655878 (DE-600)2029338-0 (DE-576)252613988 0959-6526 nnns volume:426 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 43.35 Umweltrichtlinien Umweltnormen VZ 85.35 Fertigung VZ AR 426
spelling	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156 doi (DE-627)ELV065146581 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl Mocelin, Douglas Martins verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 aut Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate. Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability Isied, Mayzan Maher verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 aut Castorena, Cassie verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084 aut Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993 426 Online-Ressource (DE-627)324655878 (DE-600)2029338-0 (DE-576)252613988 0959-6526 nnns volume:426 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 43.35 Umweltrichtlinien Umweltnormen VZ 85.35 Fertigung VZ AR 426
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156 doi (DE-627)ELV065146581 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl Mocelin, Douglas Martins verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 aut Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate. Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability Isied, Mayzan Maher verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 aut Castorena, Cassie verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084 aut Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993 426 Online-Ressource (DE-627)324655878 (DE-600)2029338-0 (DE-576)252613988 0959-6526 nnns volume:426 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 43.35 Umweltrichtlinien Umweltnormen VZ 85.35 Fertigung VZ AR 426
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156 doi (DE-627)ELV065146581 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl Mocelin, Douglas Martins verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 aut Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate. Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability Isied, Mayzan Maher verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 aut Castorena, Cassie verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084 aut Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993 426 Online-Ressource (DE-627)324655878 (DE-600)2029338-0 (DE-576)252613988 0959-6526 nnns volume:426 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 43.35 Umweltrichtlinien Umweltnormen VZ 85.35 Fertigung VZ AR 426
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156 doi (DE-627)ELV065146581 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl Mocelin, Douglas Martins verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 aut Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate. Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability Isied, Mayzan Maher verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 aut Castorena, Cassie verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084 aut Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993 426 Online-Ressource (DE-627)324655878 (DE-600)2029338-0 (DE-576)252613988 0959-6526 nnns volume:426 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 43.35 Umweltrichtlinien Umweltnormen VZ 85.35 Fertigung VZ AR 426
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production 426 volume:426
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of cleaner production 426 volume:426
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Umweltrichtlinien Umweltnormen Fertigung
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability
dewey-raw	690
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of cleaner production
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Mocelin, Douglas Martins @@aut@@ Isied, Mayzan Maher @@aut@@ Castorena, Cassie @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	324655878
dewey-sort	3690
id	ELV065146581
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV065146581</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231210093148.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231015s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV065146581</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.35</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mocelin, Douglas Martins</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Asphalt mixtures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Volumetric properties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recycled asphalt pavement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recycled asphalt shingles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recycled binder availability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Isied, Mayzan Maher</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Castorena, Cassie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of cleaner production</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">426</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)324655878</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2029338-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)252613988</subfield><subfield code="x">0959-6526</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:426</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.35</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltrichtlinien</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltnormen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="j">Fertigung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">426</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Mocelin, Douglas Martins
spellingShingle	Mocelin, Douglas Martins ddc 690 bkl 43.35 bkl 85.35 misc Asphalt mixtures misc Volumetric properties misc Recycled asphalt pavement misc Recycled asphalt shingles misc Recycled binder availability Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
authorStr	Mocelin, Douglas Martins
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)324655878
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	690 - Buildings 330 - Economics
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0959-6526
topic_title	690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures Asphalt mixtures Volumetric properties Recycled asphalt pavement Recycled asphalt shingles Recycled binder availability
topic	ddc 690 bkl 43.35 bkl 85.35 misc Asphalt mixtures misc Volumetric properties misc Recycled asphalt pavement misc Recycled asphalt shingles misc Recycled binder availability
topic_unstemmed	ddc 690 bkl 43.35 bkl 85.35 misc Asphalt mixtures misc Volumetric properties misc Recycled asphalt pavement misc Recycled asphalt shingles misc Recycled binder availability
topic_browse	ddc 690 bkl 43.35 bkl 85.35 misc Asphalt mixtures misc Volumetric properties misc Recycled asphalt pavement misc Recycled asphalt shingles misc Recycled binder availability
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of cleaner production
hierarchy_parent_id	324655878
dewey-tens	690 - Building & construction 330 - Economics
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of cleaner production
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)324655878 (DE-600)2029338-0 (DE-576)252613988
title	Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV065146581 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0
title_full	Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
author_sort	Mocelin, Douglas Martins
journal	Journal of cleaner production
journalStr	Journal of cleaner production
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Mocelin, Douglas Martins Isied, Mayzan Maher Castorena, Cassie
container_volume	426
class	690 330 VZ 43.35 bkl 85.35 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Mocelin, Douglas Martins
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-7670-6136 (ORCID)0000-0001-7932-1533 (ORCID)0000-0002-5915-0084
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136 (orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533 (orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084
dewey-full	690 330
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (rap) and recycled asphalt shingle (ras) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
title_auth	Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
abstract	Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate.
abstractGer	Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate.
abstract_unstemmed	Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures
remote_bool	true
author2	Isied, Mayzan Maher Castorena, Cassie
author2Str	Isied, Mayzan Maher Castorena, Cassie
ppnlink	324655878
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156
up_date	2024-07-06T22:00:00.712Z
_version_	1803868648991883264
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV065146581</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231210093148.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231015s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139156</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV065146581</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(23)03314-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.35</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mocelin, Douglas Martins</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7670-6136</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) are incorporated in the production of new asphalt mixtures to reduce cost, waste, and the consumption of virgin materials. The use of recycled asphalt materials (RAM) is limited by controlling agencies due to the uncertainties regarding their impacts on the volumetric composition and long-term performance of the asphalt mixtures. Recycled binder availability (RBA), which reflects the proportion of the recycled binder that is available to blend with virgin asphalt in an asphalt mixture, is currently neglected by the majority of mix design methods adopted by highway agencies, despite complete RBA being considered an unrealistic scenario. An incorrect assumption of the RBA in mixture design has important consequences on the inferred asphalt mixture volumetric properties, and consequently on the performance. A recently created method, so-called Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD), proposes a revised interpretation of the volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures and design of the aggregate structure on the basis of partial RBA caused by agglomerations of RAM particles. The AAMD method is used in this study to evaluate the impacts of RBA on the volumetric properties of a diverse set of surface asphalt mixtures. The impacts of the RBA on the inferences of asphalt mixture composition are assessed for each mixture and the viability of using fixed RBA values for RAP and RAS sources in the state of North Carolina is assessed by comparing the inferred asphalt mixture composition yielded from the source-specific RBA versus the average RBA of the pool of recycled materials studied. The results show that the volumetric properties change considerably as a function of the assumed RBA, and the use of the AAMD becomes crucial for mixtures containing as little as 15 percent RAP and/or 4 percent or RAS. The use of a fixed RAS RBA value, calibrated as the average of a representative set of RAS stockpiles, versus the source-specific values has negligible impacts on the inferred volumetric properties of mixtures containing permissible RAS contents in North Carolina. Conversely, the use of source-specific RAP RBA values is recommended, which can be quantified through comparative sieve analysis of RAP and recovered RAP aggregate.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Asphalt mixtures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Volumetric properties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recycled asphalt pavement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recycled asphalt shingles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recycled binder availability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Isied, Mayzan Maher</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7932-1533</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Castorena, Cassie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5915-0084</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of cleaner production</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">426</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)324655878</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2029338-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)252613988</subfield><subfield code="x">0959-6526</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:426</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.35</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltrichtlinien</subfield><subfield code="j">Umweltnormen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="j">Fertigung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">426</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4024944

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingle (RAS) binder availability on the composition of asphalt mixtures

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?