Design of structured
This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a pass...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sato, Masayuki [verfasserIn] Marcos, Andrés [verfasserIn] Akasaka, Daisuke [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: ISA transactions - Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X, Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989, 143, Seite 20-37 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:143 ; pages:20-37 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV066131294 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV066131294 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231213093121.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231213s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV066131294 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q VZ |
084 | |a 50.21 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 50.20 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sato, Masayuki |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design of structured |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Robust control | |
650 | 4 | |a Aircraft validation | |
650 | 4 | |a Observer design | |
700 | 1 | |a Marcos, Andrés |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Akasaka, Daisuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X |t ISA transactions |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989 |g 143, Seite 20-37 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320505243 |w (DE-600)2012746-7 |w (DE-576)271360690 |x 1879-2022 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:143 |g pages:20-37 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 50.21 |j Messtechnik |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 50.20 |j Automatisierungstechnik |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 143 |h 20-37 |
author_variant |
m s ms a m am d a da |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18792022:2023----::einftu |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
bklnumber |
50.21 50.20 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 doi (DE-627)ELV066131294 (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl Sato, Masayuki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 aut Design of structured 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design Marcos, Andrés verfasserin aut Akasaka, Daisuke verfasserin aut Enthalten in Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X ISA transactions Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989 143, Seite 20-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320505243 (DE-600)2012746-7 (DE-576)271360690 1879-2022 nnns volume:143 pages:20-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 50.21 Messtechnik VZ 50.20 Automatisierungstechnik VZ AR 143 20-37 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 doi (DE-627)ELV066131294 (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl Sato, Masayuki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 aut Design of structured 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design Marcos, Andrés verfasserin aut Akasaka, Daisuke verfasserin aut Enthalten in Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X ISA transactions Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989 143, Seite 20-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320505243 (DE-600)2012746-7 (DE-576)271360690 1879-2022 nnns volume:143 pages:20-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 50.21 Messtechnik VZ 50.20 Automatisierungstechnik VZ AR 143 20-37 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 doi (DE-627)ELV066131294 (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl Sato, Masayuki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 aut Design of structured 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design Marcos, Andrés verfasserin aut Akasaka, Daisuke verfasserin aut Enthalten in Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X ISA transactions Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989 143, Seite 20-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320505243 (DE-600)2012746-7 (DE-576)271360690 1879-2022 nnns volume:143 pages:20-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 50.21 Messtechnik VZ 50.20 Automatisierungstechnik VZ AR 143 20-37 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 doi (DE-627)ELV066131294 (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl Sato, Masayuki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 aut Design of structured 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design Marcos, Andrés verfasserin aut Akasaka, Daisuke verfasserin aut Enthalten in Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X ISA transactions Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989 143, Seite 20-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320505243 (DE-600)2012746-7 (DE-576)271360690 1879-2022 nnns volume:143 pages:20-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 50.21 Messtechnik VZ 50.20 Automatisierungstechnik VZ AR 143 20-37 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 doi (DE-627)ELV066131294 (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl Sato, Masayuki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 aut Design of structured 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design Marcos, Andrés verfasserin aut Akasaka, Daisuke verfasserin aut Enthalten in Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X ISA transactions Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989 143, Seite 20-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320505243 (DE-600)2012746-7 (DE-576)271360690 1879-2022 nnns volume:143 pages:20-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 50.21 Messtechnik VZ 50.20 Automatisierungstechnik VZ AR 143 20-37 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in ISA transactions 143, Seite 20-37 volume:143 pages:20-37 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in ISA transactions 143, Seite 20-37 volume:143 pages:20-37 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Messtechnik Automatisierungstechnik |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design |
dewey-raw |
530 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
ISA transactions |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sato, Masayuki @@aut@@ Marcos, Andrés @@aut@@ Akasaka, Daisuke @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
320505243 |
dewey-sort |
3530 |
id |
ELV066131294 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066131294</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231213093121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231213s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066131294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.21</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sato, Masayuki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design of structured</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Robust control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aircraft validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Observer design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcos, Andrés</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akasaka, Daisuke</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="a">Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X</subfield><subfield code="t">ISA transactions</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989</subfield><subfield code="g">143, Seite 20-37</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320505243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012746-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)271360690</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-2022</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:143</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:20-37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.21</subfield><subfield code="j">Messtechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Automatisierungstechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">143</subfield><subfield code="h">20-37</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Sato, Masayuki |
spellingShingle |
Sato, Masayuki ddc 530 bkl 50.21 bkl 50.20 misc Robust control misc Aircraft validation misc Observer design Design of structured |
authorStr |
Sato, Masayuki |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320505243 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
530 - Physics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1879-2022 |
topic_title |
530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl Design of structured Robust control Aircraft validation Observer design |
topic |
ddc 530 bkl 50.21 bkl 50.20 misc Robust control misc Aircraft validation misc Observer design |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 bkl 50.21 bkl 50.20 misc Robust control misc Aircraft validation misc Observer design |
topic_browse |
ddc 530 bkl 50.21 bkl 50.20 misc Robust control misc Aircraft validation misc Observer design |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
ISA transactions |
hierarchy_parent_id |
320505243 |
dewey-tens |
530 - Physics |
hierarchy_top_title |
ISA transactions |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320505243 (DE-600)2012746-7 (DE-576)271360690 |
title |
Design of structured |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV066131294 (ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4 |
title_full |
Design of structured |
author_sort |
Sato, Masayuki |
journal |
ISA transactions |
journalStr |
ISA transactions |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
20 |
author_browse |
Sato, Masayuki Marcos, Andrés Akasaka, Daisuke |
container_volume |
143 |
class |
530 VZ 50.21 bkl 50.20 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sato, Masayuki |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-0387-3467 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467 |
dewey-full |
530 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
design of structured |
title_auth |
Design of structured |
abstract |
This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. |
abstractGer |
This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Design of structured |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Marcos, Andrés Akasaka, Daisuke |
author2Str |
Marcos, Andrés Akasaka, Daisuke |
ppnlink |
320505243 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T16:41:21.009Z |
_version_ |
1803848600533336064 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066131294</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231213093121.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231213s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.isatra.2023.08.029</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066131294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0019-0578(23)00394-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.21</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sato, Masayuki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0387-3467</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design of structured</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article presents the structured H ∞ design and validation of two types of flight controller architectures: a passive fault-tolerant controller for the longitudinal motion and an active observer-based fault-tolerant controller for the lateral-directional motion. In the first, the controller follows the conventional Stability/Control Augmentation System (SCAS) structure, and its gains are obtained in continuous-time with the hinfstruct command by considering a set of elevator Loss-Of-Efficiency (LOE) faults. For the second, the conventional Luenberger observer-based controller structure is used, and the design aims to monitor the health of the aileron and rudder actuators in addition to provide active tolerance against LOE faults. Two different discrete-time designs are obtained for the latter, one focused on control performance optimization (using also the hinfstruct command), and the other on simultaneous control and observer performance optimization (using the systune command and under a slightly relaxed control performance constraint). For the two types of architectures, unmodeled dynamics are represented by uncertain bounded time delays modeled as pure delays or first-order Padé approximations. The resulting controllers are implemented on-board JAXA’s research airplane MuPAL- α , and not only is their practicality demonstrated but also control performance is validated via Aircraft-In-the-Loop (AIL) testing under gust-free and realistic gusty conditions. This demonstration is at a Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 7–8, resulting in a high-level of confidence in the validity of the proposed flight control structures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Robust control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aircraft validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Observer design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcos, Andrés</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akasaka, Daisuke</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="a">Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society ; ID: gnd/10022359-X</subfield><subfield code="t">ISA transactions</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1989</subfield><subfield code="g">143, Seite 20-37</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320505243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012746-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)271360690</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-2022</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:143</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:20-37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.21</subfield><subfield code="j">Messtechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Automatisierungstechnik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">143</subfield><subfield code="h">20-37</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3973856 |