Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons
This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Feng, Jiahui [verfasserIn] Shao, Xudong [verfasserIn] Qiu, Minghong [verfasserIn] Li, Huihui [verfasserIn] Gao, Xiang [verfasserIn] Huang, Zhonglin [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Engineering structures - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978, 300 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:300 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV066247489 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV066247489 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224093035.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV066247489 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
084 | |a 38.38 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 56.20 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 56.11 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Feng, Jiahui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) | |
650 | 4 | |a Reliability index | |
650 | 4 | |a Flexural capacity | |
650 | 4 | |a Standards | |
650 | 4 | |a Reinforced UHPC beams | |
650 | 4 | |a Prestressed UHPC beams | |
700 | 1 | |a Shao, Xudong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Qiu, Minghong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Huihui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gao, Xiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Huang, Zhonglin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Engineering structures |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978 |g 300 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320423344 |w (DE-600)2002833-7 |w (DE-576)259271195 |x 0141-0296 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:300 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 38.38 |j Seismologie |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 56.20 |j Ingenieurgeologie |j Bodenmechanik |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 56.11 |j Baukonstruktion |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 300 |
author_variant |
j f jf x s xs m q mq h l hl x g xg z h zh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:01410296:2023----::eiblteautoofeuacpctdsgpoiinoupbasenocdih |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
bklnumber |
38.38 56.20 56.11 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 doi (DE-627)ELV066247489 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Feng, Jiahui verfasserin aut Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams Shao, Xudong verfasserin aut Qiu, Minghong verfasserin aut Li, Huihui verfasserin aut Gao, Xiang verfasserin aut Huang, Zhonglin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Engineering structures Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978 300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320423344 (DE-600)2002833-7 (DE-576)259271195 0141-0296 nnns volume:300 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 300 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 doi (DE-627)ELV066247489 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Feng, Jiahui verfasserin aut Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams Shao, Xudong verfasserin aut Qiu, Minghong verfasserin aut Li, Huihui verfasserin aut Gao, Xiang verfasserin aut Huang, Zhonglin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Engineering structures Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978 300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320423344 (DE-600)2002833-7 (DE-576)259271195 0141-0296 nnns volume:300 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 300 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 doi (DE-627)ELV066247489 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Feng, Jiahui verfasserin aut Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams Shao, Xudong verfasserin aut Qiu, Minghong verfasserin aut Li, Huihui verfasserin aut Gao, Xiang verfasserin aut Huang, Zhonglin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Engineering structures Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978 300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320423344 (DE-600)2002833-7 (DE-576)259271195 0141-0296 nnns volume:300 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 300 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 doi (DE-627)ELV066247489 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Feng, Jiahui verfasserin aut Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams Shao, Xudong verfasserin aut Qiu, Minghong verfasserin aut Li, Huihui verfasserin aut Gao, Xiang verfasserin aut Huang, Zhonglin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Engineering structures Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978 300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320423344 (DE-600)2002833-7 (DE-576)259271195 0141-0296 nnns volume:300 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 300 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 doi (DE-627)ELV066247489 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Feng, Jiahui verfasserin aut Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams Shao, Xudong verfasserin aut Qiu, Minghong verfasserin aut Li, Huihui verfasserin aut Gao, Xiang verfasserin aut Huang, Zhonglin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Engineering structures Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978 300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320423344 (DE-600)2002833-7 (DE-576)259271195 0141-0296 nnns volume:300 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 300 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Engineering structures 300 volume:300 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Engineering structures 300 volume:300 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Seismologie Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik Baukonstruktion |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams |
dewey-raw |
690 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Engineering structures |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Feng, Jiahui @@aut@@ Shao, Xudong @@aut@@ Qiu, Minghong @@aut@@ Li, Huihui @@aut@@ Gao, Xiang @@aut@@ Huang, Zhonglin @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
320423344 |
dewey-sort |
3690 |
id |
ELV066247489 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066247489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231224093035.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231224s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066247489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Jiahui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reliability index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flexural capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforced UHPC beams</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prestressed UHPC beams</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shao, Xudong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qiu, Minghong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Huihui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Xiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Zhonglin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Engineering structures</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">300</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320423344</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2002833-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259271195</subfield><subfield code="x">0141-0296</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Seismologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Ingenieurgeologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Bodenmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="j">Baukonstruktion</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">300</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Feng, Jiahui |
spellingShingle |
Feng, Jiahui ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 misc Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) misc Reliability index misc Flexural capacity misc Standards misc Reinforced UHPC beams misc Prestressed UHPC beams Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
authorStr |
Feng, Jiahui |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320423344 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0141-0296 |
topic_title |
690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) Reliability index Flexural capacity Standards Reinforced UHPC beams Prestressed UHPC beams |
topic |
ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 misc Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) misc Reliability index misc Flexural capacity misc Standards misc Reinforced UHPC beams misc Prestressed UHPC beams |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 misc Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) misc Reliability index misc Flexural capacity misc Standards misc Reinforced UHPC beams misc Prestressed UHPC beams |
topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 misc Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) misc Reliability index misc Flexural capacity misc Standards misc Reinforced UHPC beams misc Prestressed UHPC beams |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Engineering structures |
hierarchy_parent_id |
320423344 |
dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
hierarchy_top_title |
Engineering structures |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320423344 (DE-600)2002833-7 (DE-576)259271195 |
title |
Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV066247489 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4 |
title_full |
Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
author_sort |
Feng, Jiahui |
journal |
Engineering structures |
journalStr |
Engineering structures |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Feng, Jiahui Shao, Xudong Qiu, Minghong Li, Huihui Gao, Xiang Huang, Zhonglin |
container_volume |
300 |
class |
690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Feng, Jiahui |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 |
dewey-full |
690 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for uhpc beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
title_auth |
Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
abstract |
This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. |
abstractGer |
This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Shao, Xudong Qiu, Minghong Li, Huihui Gao, Xiang Huang, Zhonglin |
author2Str |
Shao, Xudong Qiu, Minghong Li, Huihui Gao, Xiang Huang, Zhonglin |
ppnlink |
320423344 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T17:06:01.603Z |
_version_ |
1803850153046573056 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066247489</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231224093035.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231224s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117160</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066247489</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(23)01575-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Jiahui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reliability evaluation of flexural capacity design provision for UHPC beams reinforced with steel rebars/prestressing tendons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study investigated the reliability of the flexural capacity prediction models for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) beams in various standards, including the Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Chinese standards JGJ/T 465–2019 and JTG 3362–2018, Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016. The research was based on two comprehensive databases of 110 reinforced and 47 prestressed UHPC beams. Correlation analysis of the model errors of the flexural capacity formulae was conducted at first. Then, the reliability of the prediction models was analyzed through Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, considering the design parameters such as material strength, live-to-dead load ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and prestressing tendon ratio. The results indicated that the prediction model in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) could accurately predict the flexural capacity of reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams among the five specifications, with the mean model errors of 1.06 and 1.02, respectively. The reliability indexes of Chinese UHPC Code (draft), Swiss standard SIA 2052–2016, and French standard NF P18–710–2016 for both the reinforced and prestressed UHPC beams were significantly higher than the specified value of 4.2 in the Chinese standard. The sensitivity analysis showed that the reliability index increased with the increase of live-to-dead load ratio, but it was not significantly influenced by UHPC compressive strength. In addition, the reliability index decreased as the longitudinal reinforcement ratio and prestressing tendon ratio increased. Material partial factor of flexural resistance of the formula in Chinese UHPC Code (draft) was calibrated, and γ c = 1.30 was recommended for UHPC beams for safety.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reliability index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flexural capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforced UHPC beams</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prestressed UHPC beams</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shao, Xudong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qiu, Minghong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Huihui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Xiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Zhonglin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Engineering structures</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">300</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320423344</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2002833-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259271195</subfield><subfield code="x">0141-0296</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Seismologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Ingenieurgeologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Bodenmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="j">Baukonstruktion</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">300</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400937 |