Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conduc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Huang, Yuxi [verfasserIn] Liu, Yan [verfasserIn] Zhong, Fangyuan [verfasserIn] Zhou, Xin [verfasserIn] Huang, Shiqiao [verfasserIn] Huang, Chunbai [verfasserIn] Zhong, Yanchun [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: World neurosurgery - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010, 181, Seite 29-37
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:181 ; pages:29-37

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035

Katalog-ID:	ELV066497906

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV066497906
003	DE-627
005	20240202093430.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240112s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV066497906
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q VZ
084			\|a 44.90 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Huang, Yuxi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias.
650		4	\|a Meta-analysis
650		4	\|a Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
650		4	\|a Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty
650		4	\|a Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
700	1		\|a Liu, Yan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Zhong, Fangyuan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Zhou, Xin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Huang, Shiqiao \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Huang, Chunbai \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Zhong, Yanchun \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579 \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t World neurosurgery \|d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010 \|g 181, Seite 29-37 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)615134904 \|w (DE-600)2530041-6 \|w (DE-576)321461150 \|x 1878-8769 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:181 \|g pages:29-37
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_165
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 44.90 \|j Neurologie \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 181 \|h 29-37

Indexfelder

author_variant	y h yh y l yl f z fz x z xz s h sh c h ch y z yz
matchkey_str	article:18788769:2023----::ectnosuvdetbolsyessnltrlectnosetbolsyootoooivrerlopesof
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	44.90
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035 doi (DE-627)ELV066497906 (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Huang, Yuxi verfasserin aut Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias. Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Liu, Yan verfasserin aut Zhong, Fangyuan verfasserin aut Zhou, Xin verfasserin aut Huang, Shiqiao verfasserin aut Huang, Chunbai verfasserin aut Zhong, Yanchun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579 aut Enthalten in World neurosurgery Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010 181, Seite 29-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)615134904 (DE-600)2530041-6 (DE-576)321461150 1878-8769 nnns volume:181 pages:29-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 181 29-37
spelling	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035 doi (DE-627)ELV066497906 (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Huang, Yuxi verfasserin aut Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias. Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Liu, Yan verfasserin aut Zhong, Fangyuan verfasserin aut Zhou, Xin verfasserin aut Huang, Shiqiao verfasserin aut Huang, Chunbai verfasserin aut Zhong, Yanchun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579 aut Enthalten in World neurosurgery Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010 181, Seite 29-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)615134904 (DE-600)2530041-6 (DE-576)321461150 1878-8769 nnns volume:181 pages:29-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 181 29-37
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035 doi (DE-627)ELV066497906 (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Huang, Yuxi verfasserin aut Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias. Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Liu, Yan verfasserin aut Zhong, Fangyuan verfasserin aut Zhou, Xin verfasserin aut Huang, Shiqiao verfasserin aut Huang, Chunbai verfasserin aut Zhong, Yanchun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579 aut Enthalten in World neurosurgery Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010 181, Seite 29-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)615134904 (DE-600)2530041-6 (DE-576)321461150 1878-8769 nnns volume:181 pages:29-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 181 29-37
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035 doi (DE-627)ELV066497906 (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Huang, Yuxi verfasserin aut Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias. Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Liu, Yan verfasserin aut Zhong, Fangyuan verfasserin aut Zhou, Xin verfasserin aut Huang, Shiqiao verfasserin aut Huang, Chunbai verfasserin aut Zhong, Yanchun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579 aut Enthalten in World neurosurgery Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010 181, Seite 29-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)615134904 (DE-600)2530041-6 (DE-576)321461150 1878-8769 nnns volume:181 pages:29-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 181 29-37
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035 doi (DE-627)ELV066497906 (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.90 bkl Huang, Yuxi verfasserin aut Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias. Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Liu, Yan verfasserin aut Zhong, Fangyuan verfasserin aut Zhou, Xin verfasserin aut Huang, Shiqiao verfasserin aut Huang, Chunbai verfasserin aut Zhong, Yanchun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579 aut Enthalten in World neurosurgery Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010 181, Seite 29-37 Online-Ressource (DE-627)615134904 (DE-600)2530041-6 (DE-576)321461150 1878-8769 nnns volume:181 pages:29-37 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 181 29-37
language	English
source	Enthalten in World neurosurgery 181, Seite 29-37 volume:181 pages:29-37
sourceStr	Enthalten in World neurosurgery 181, Seite 29-37 volume:181 pages:29-37
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Neurologie
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	World neurosurgery
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Huang, Yuxi @@aut@@ Liu, Yan @@aut@@ Zhong, Fangyuan @@aut@@ Zhou, Xin @@aut@@ Huang, Shiqiao @@aut@@ Huang, Chunbai @@aut@@ Zhong, Yanchun @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	615134904
dewey-sort	3610
id	ELV066497906
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066497906</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240202093430.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240112s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066497906</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Yuxi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Yan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhong, Fangyuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Xin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Shiqiao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Chunbai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhong, Yanchun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World neurosurgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">181, Seite 29-37</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)615134904</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2530041-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)321461150</subfield><subfield code="x">1878-8769</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:181</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:29-37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">181</subfield><subfield code="h">29-37</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Huang, Yuxi
spellingShingle	Huang, Yuxi ddc 610 bkl 44.90 misc Meta-analysis misc Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture misc Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty misc Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
authorStr	Huang, Yuxi
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)615134904
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1878-8769
topic_title	610 VZ 44.90 bkl Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Meta-analysis Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
topic	ddc 610 bkl 44.90 misc Meta-analysis misc Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture misc Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty misc Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 bkl 44.90 misc Meta-analysis misc Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture misc Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty misc Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
topic_browse	ddc 610 bkl 44.90 misc Meta-analysis misc Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture misc Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty misc Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	World neurosurgery
hierarchy_parent_id	615134904
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	World neurosurgery
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)615134904 (DE-600)2530041-6 (DE-576)321461150
title	Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV066497906 (ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7
title_full	Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
author_sort	Huang, Yuxi
journal	World neurosurgery
journalStr	World neurosurgery
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	29
author_browse	Huang, Yuxi Liu, Yan Zhong, Fangyuan Zhou, Xin Huang, Shiqiao Huang, Chunbai Zhong, Yanchun
container_volume	181
class	610 VZ 44.90 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Huang, Yuxi
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-0558-6579
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579
dewey-full	610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	percutaneous curved vertebroplasty versus unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_auth	Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
abstract	Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias.
abstractGer	Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
remote_bool	true
author2	Liu, Yan Zhong, Fangyuan Zhou, Xin Huang, Shiqiao Huang, Chunbai Zhong, Yanchun
author2Str	Liu, Yan Zhong, Fangyuan Zhou, Xin Huang, Shiqiao Huang, Chunbai Zhong, Yanchun
ppnlink	615134904
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035
up_date	2024-07-06T17:58:04.651Z
_version_	1803853427799752704
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066497906</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240202093430.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240112s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.035</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066497906</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1878-8750(23)01440-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Yuxi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP), a modified traditional unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) technique, is increasingly being used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs); however, its advantages remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether PCVP is superior to traditional UPVP in treating OVCFs.Methods: Six databases were searched for studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PCVP and UPVP in treating patients with OVCFs published until March 2023. After study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, a meta-analysis was conducted. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42023417190).Results: Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled results revealed no between-group differences in operation time (P = 0.85), intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.58), or postoperative short-term visual analog scale scores (P = 0.15). However, PCVP was associated with more injected cement (P = 0.003), a lower cement leakage rate (P = 0.006), and a lower final follow-up visual analog scale score (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: PCVP was superior to UPVP in terms of reducing the bone cement leakage rate and providing long-term pain relief. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to verify these findings owing to the potential risk of bias.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Yan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhong, Fangyuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Xin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Shiqiao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Chunbai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhong, Yanchun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-0558-6579</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">World neurosurgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">181, Seite 29-37</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)615134904</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2530041-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)321461150</subfield><subfield code="x">1878-8769</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:181</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:29-37</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">181</subfield><subfield code="h">29-37</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3985043

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty Versus Unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?