The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Pan, Jiangpeng [verfasserIn] Jia, Yongliang [verfasserIn] Shi, Jianxiang [verfasserIn] Yao, Ruinan [verfasserIn] Guo, Jiancheng [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of ethnopharmacology - New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979, 322 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:322 |
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV066526574 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV066526574 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240113093153.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240113s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV066526574 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |a 390 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 15,3 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a PHARM |q DE-84 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 44.41 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pan, Jiangpeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Esophageal cancer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized controlled trials | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Compound kushen injection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Clinical efficacy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jia, Yongliang |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shi, Jianxiang |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yao, Ruinan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guo, Jiancheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of ethnopharmacology |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979 |g 322 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)302467696 |w (DE-600)1491279-X |w (DE-576)081952767 |x 1872-7573 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:322 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-PHARM | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_156 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.41 |j Pharmazeutische Biologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 322 | ||
| author_variant |
j p jp y j yj j s js r y ry j g jg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18727573:2023----::hefccadaeyfopuduhnnetofrdlsihspaelacrmtaay |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
| bklnumber |
44.41 |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 doi (DE-627)ELV066526574 (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl Pan, Jiangpeng verfasserin aut The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy Jia, Yongliang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 aut Shi, Jianxiang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 aut Yao, Ruinan verfasserin aut Guo, Jiancheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979 322 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302467696 (DE-600)1491279-X (DE-576)081952767 1872-7573 nnns volume:322 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_156 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.41 Pharmazeutische Biologie VZ AR 322 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 doi (DE-627)ELV066526574 (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl Pan, Jiangpeng verfasserin aut The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy Jia, Yongliang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 aut Shi, Jianxiang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 aut Yao, Ruinan verfasserin aut Guo, Jiancheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979 322 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302467696 (DE-600)1491279-X (DE-576)081952767 1872-7573 nnns volume:322 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_156 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.41 Pharmazeutische Biologie VZ AR 322 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 doi (DE-627)ELV066526574 (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl Pan, Jiangpeng verfasserin aut The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy Jia, Yongliang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 aut Shi, Jianxiang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 aut Yao, Ruinan verfasserin aut Guo, Jiancheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979 322 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302467696 (DE-600)1491279-X (DE-576)081952767 1872-7573 nnns volume:322 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_156 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.41 Pharmazeutische Biologie VZ AR 322 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 doi (DE-627)ELV066526574 (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl Pan, Jiangpeng verfasserin aut The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy Jia, Yongliang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 aut Shi, Jianxiang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 aut Yao, Ruinan verfasserin aut Guo, Jiancheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979 322 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302467696 (DE-600)1491279-X (DE-576)081952767 1872-7573 nnns volume:322 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_156 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.41 Pharmazeutische Biologie VZ AR 322 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 doi (DE-627)ELV066526574 (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl Pan, Jiangpeng verfasserin aut The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy Jia, Yongliang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 aut Shi, Jianxiang verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 aut Yao, Ruinan verfasserin aut Guo, Jiancheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979 322 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302467696 (DE-600)1491279-X (DE-576)081952767 1872-7573 nnns volume:322 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_156 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.41 Pharmazeutische Biologie VZ AR 322 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology 322 volume:322 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of ethnopharmacology 322 volume:322 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Pharmazeutische Biologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of ethnopharmacology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pan, Jiangpeng @@aut@@ Jia, Yongliang @@aut@@ Shi, Jianxiang @@aut@@ Yao, Ruinan @@aut@@ Guo, Jiancheng @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
302467696 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV066526574 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066526574</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240113093153.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240113s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066526574</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">390</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHARM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-84</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.41</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pan, Jiangpeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Esophageal cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Randomized controlled trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compound kushen injection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Clinical efficacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jia, Yongliang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi, Jianxiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yao, Ruinan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guo, Jiancheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of ethnopharmacology</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979</subfield><subfield code="g">322</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)302467696</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1491279-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)081952767</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-7573</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHARM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.41</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutische Biologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">322</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Pan, Jiangpeng |
| spellingShingle |
Pan, Jiangpeng ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.41 misc Esophageal cancer misc Randomized controlled trials misc Meta-analysis misc Compound kushen injection misc Clinical efficacy The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| authorStr |
Pan, Jiangpeng |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)302467696 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 390 - Customs, etiquette & folklore |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1872-7573 |
| topic_title |
610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Esophageal cancer Randomized controlled trials Meta-analysis Compound kushen injection Clinical efficacy |
| topic |
ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.41 misc Esophageal cancer misc Randomized controlled trials misc Meta-analysis misc Compound kushen injection misc Clinical efficacy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.41 misc Esophageal cancer misc Randomized controlled trials misc Meta-analysis misc Compound kushen injection misc Clinical efficacy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ssgn 15,3 fid PHARM bkl 44.41 misc Esophageal cancer misc Randomized controlled trials misc Meta-analysis misc Compound kushen injection misc Clinical efficacy |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of ethnopharmacology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
302467696 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 390 - Customs, etiquette & folklore |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of ethnopharmacology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)302467696 (DE-600)1491279-X (DE-576)081952767 |
| title |
The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV066526574 (ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5 |
| title_full |
The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| author_sort |
Pan, Jiangpeng |
| journal |
Journal of ethnopharmacology |
| journalStr |
Journal of ethnopharmacology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| author_browse |
Pan, Jiangpeng Jia, Yongliang Shi, Jianxiang Yao, Ruinan Guo, Jiancheng |
| container_volume |
322 |
| class |
610 390 VZ 15,3 ssgn PHARM DE-84 fid 44.41 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Pan, Jiangpeng |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-4981-9282 (ORCID)0000-0002-4346-3895 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282 (orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895 |
| dewey-full |
610 390 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
the efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| title_auth |
The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| abstract |
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. |
| abstractGer |
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-PHARM SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_156 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| title_short |
The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Jia, Yongliang Shi, Jianxiang Yao, Ruinan Guo, Jiancheng |
| author2Str |
Jia, Yongliang Shi, Jianxiang Yao, Ruinan Guo, Jiancheng |
| ppnlink |
302467696 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:04:06.474Z |
| _version_ |
1803853807198666752 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066526574</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240113093153.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240113s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jep.2023.117604</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066526574</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-8741(23)01474-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">390</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHARM</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-84</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.41</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pan, Jiangpeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The efficacy and safety of compound kushen injection for adults with esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ethnopharmacological relevance: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine Sophora flavescens, has been widely prescribed to treat a variety of cancers including esophageal cancer (ESCA) in China.Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI for ESCA systematically.Methods: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database with No. CRD42022320503. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Clinicaltrials, and Chi-CTR were searched to select RCTs that compared CKI with other interventions for ESCA with outcome measures including clinical efficacy, complete response, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of RCT. The overall effect sizes were estimated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on binary outcome data. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses on characteristics of RCTs were performed to test the robustness. Publication bias was also detected with different methods. The evidence strength was assessed with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.Results: This study finally included 35 RCTs with 2491 ESCA patients. The RoB of RCTs was some concern. The effect size of OR was 2.92 (95% CI [2.39, 3.57]) on clinical efficacy, 2.27 (95% CI [1.84, 2.81]) on complete response, 3.71 (95% CI [2.86, 4.80]) on QoL, 0.39 (95% CI [0.30, 0.50]) on AEs, and 0.13 (95% CI [0.07, 0.27]) on SAEs where the statistical significances (P < 0.00001) were found for all outcome measures. These overall effect sizes showed that CKI was more efficacious and safety for ESCA. Moreover, subgroup and sensitivity analyses found consistent results. Most publication bias analyses showed insignificant differences. The evidence strengths were moderate.Conclusion: The moderate evidence from this comprehensive PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis suggested that CKI may be a valuable alternative for adult patients with ESCA on its significant efficacy and safety. However, more RCTs of high quality with low RoB, large sample sizes, and long follow-up periods are still warranted to update the ESCA clinical guideline for physicians and policymakers in further study.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Esophageal cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Randomized controlled trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compound kushen injection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Clinical efficacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jia, Yongliang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4981-9282</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi, Jianxiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4346-3895</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yao, Ruinan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guo, Jiancheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of ethnopharmacology</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1979</subfield><subfield code="g">322</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)302467696</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1491279-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)081952767</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-7573</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHARM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.41</subfield><subfield code="j">Pharmazeutische Biologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">322</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401535 |