Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine

In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct curren...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ullah, Wasiq [verfasserIn] Selema, Ahmed [verfasserIn] Khan, Faisal [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Applied energy - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975, 357
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:357

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464

Katalog-ID:	ELV066773970

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	ELV066773970
003	DE-627
005	20240130093103.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240130s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV066773970
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 620 \|q VZ
084			\|a 52.50 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Ullah, Wasiq \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results.
650		4	\|a Dual rotor
650		4	\|a Flux switching generator
650		4	\|a Wind generator
650		4	\|a Wind turbine
650		4	\|a Wind power generation
700	1		\|a Selema, Ahmed \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Khan, Faisal \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Applied energy \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975 \|g 357 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)320406709 \|w (DE-600)2000772-3 \|w (DE-576)256140251 \|x 1872-9118 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:357
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 52.50 \|j Energietechnik: Allgemeines \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 357

Indexfelder

author_variant	w u wu a s as f k fk
matchkey_str	article:18729118:2023----::einncmaaienlssfuloowudilectdlxwthngnrtrohueodcir
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	52.50
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464 doi (DE-627)ELV066773970 (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 VZ 52.50 bkl Ullah, Wasiq verfasserin aut Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results. Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation Selema, Ahmed verfasserin aut Khan, Faisal verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied energy Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975 357 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406709 (DE-600)2000772-3 (DE-576)256140251 1872-9118 nnns volume:357 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 52.50 Energietechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 357
spelling	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464 doi (DE-627)ELV066773970 (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 VZ 52.50 bkl Ullah, Wasiq verfasserin aut Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results. Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation Selema, Ahmed verfasserin aut Khan, Faisal verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied energy Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975 357 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406709 (DE-600)2000772-3 (DE-576)256140251 1872-9118 nnns volume:357 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 52.50 Energietechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 357
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464 doi (DE-627)ELV066773970 (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 VZ 52.50 bkl Ullah, Wasiq verfasserin aut Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results. Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation Selema, Ahmed verfasserin aut Khan, Faisal verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied energy Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975 357 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406709 (DE-600)2000772-3 (DE-576)256140251 1872-9118 nnns volume:357 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 52.50 Energietechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 357
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464 doi (DE-627)ELV066773970 (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 VZ 52.50 bkl Ullah, Wasiq verfasserin aut Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results. Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation Selema, Ahmed verfasserin aut Khan, Faisal verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied energy Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975 357 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406709 (DE-600)2000772-3 (DE-576)256140251 1872-9118 nnns volume:357 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 52.50 Energietechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 357
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464 doi (DE-627)ELV066773970 (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 VZ 52.50 bkl Ullah, Wasiq verfasserin aut Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results. Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation Selema, Ahmed verfasserin aut Khan, Faisal verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied energy Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975 357 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320406709 (DE-600)2000772-3 (DE-576)256140251 1872-9118 nnns volume:357 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 52.50 Energietechnik: Allgemeines VZ AR 357
language	English
source	Enthalten in Applied energy 357 volume:357
sourceStr	Enthalten in Applied energy 357 volume:357
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Energietechnik: Allgemeines
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation
dewey-raw	620
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Applied energy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ullah, Wasiq @@aut@@ Selema, Ahmed @@aut@@ Khan, Faisal @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	320406709
dewey-sort	3620
id	ELV066773970
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066773970</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240130093103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240130s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066773970</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ullah, Wasiq</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dual rotor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flux switching generator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind generator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind turbine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind power generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Selema, Ahmed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khan, Faisal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied energy</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">357</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320406709</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2000772-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)256140251</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-9118</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:357</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Energietechnik: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">357</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Ullah, Wasiq
spellingShingle	Ullah, Wasiq ddc 620 bkl 52.50 misc Dual rotor misc Flux switching generator misc Wind generator misc Wind turbine misc Wind power generation Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
authorStr	Ullah, Wasiq
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)320406709
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	620 - Engineering & allied operations
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1872-9118
topic_title	620 VZ 52.50 bkl Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine Dual rotor Flux switching generator Wind generator Wind turbine Wind power generation
topic	ddc 620 bkl 52.50 misc Dual rotor misc Flux switching generator misc Wind generator misc Wind turbine misc Wind power generation
topic_unstemmed	ddc 620 bkl 52.50 misc Dual rotor misc Flux switching generator misc Wind generator misc Wind turbine misc Wind power generation
topic_browse	ddc 620 bkl 52.50 misc Dual rotor misc Flux switching generator misc Wind generator misc Wind turbine misc Wind power generation
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Applied energy
hierarchy_parent_id	320406709
dewey-tens	620 - Engineering
hierarchy_top_title	Applied energy
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)320406709 (DE-600)2000772-3 (DE-576)256140251
title	Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV066773970 (ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7
title_full	Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
author_sort	Ullah, Wasiq
journal	Applied energy
journalStr	Applied energy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Ullah, Wasiq Selema, Ahmed Khan, Faisal
container_volume	357
class	620 VZ 52.50 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ullah, Wasiq
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464
dewey-full	620
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household dc microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
title_auth	Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
abstract	In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results.
abstractGer	In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results.
abstract_unstemmed	In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine
remote_bool	true
author2	Selema, Ahmed Khan, Faisal
author2Str	Selema, Ahmed Khan, Faisal
ppnlink	320406709
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464
up_date	2024-07-06T18:56:52.079Z
_version_	1803857126575046656
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV066773970</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240130093103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240130s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122464</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV066773970</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0306-2619(23)01828-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ullah, Wasiq</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper, two variants of the magnetless dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator (DRWFEFSG) are comparatively analyzed for single rotor wind turbine (termed as machine I (MI)) and counter rotating wind turbine applications (termed as machine II (MII)) for household direct current (DC) microgrid system. First, design concept and integration to wind turbine system are discussed. Secondly, comprehensively performance analysis i.e., static analysis, dynamic load/speed analysis and electromagnetic performance analysis are executed. Finite element analysis (FEA) based static analysis evident that MI offers 7.6% higher torque in inner rotor whereas MII exhibits 18% higher torque in outer rotor. Dynamic respond unveils that in comparison to MII, MI suffers from the issue of voltage regulation. Additionally, electromagnetic analysis reveals that both MI and MII exhibits excellent response under variable field Magneto-motive force (MMF). Comparative analysis unveils that MII requires lower field MMF to achieve same response to counterpart MI. Quantitative analysis divulge efficiency of 88.49% and power factor of 0.93 in MI whereas MII at rated operating point demonstrates 85.9% efficiency and 0.96 power factor. Finally, effectiveness of the study and validity of DRWFEFSG for wind turbine applications are tested with hardware prototypes of both MI and MII that fairly matched with FEA results.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dual rotor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flux switching generator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind generator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind turbine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wind power generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Selema, Ahmed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khan, Faisal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied energy</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">357</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320406709</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2000772-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)256140251</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-9118</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:357</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Energietechnik: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">357</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399585

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?