Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals

Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Healt...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Goldfarb, Madeline [verfasserIn] Choi, Pamela M. [verfasserIn] Gollin, Gerald [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of surgical research - Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961, 295, Seite 296-301
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:295 ; pages:296-301

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005

Katalog-ID:	ELV067149715

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	ELV067149715
003	DE-627
005	20240222093154.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240222s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV067149715
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q VZ
084			\|a 44.65 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Goldfarb, Madeline \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently.
650		4	\|a Anastomosis
650		4	\|a Necrotizing enterocolitis
650		4	\|a Outcomes
650		4	\|a Stoma
650		4	\|a Surgery
700	1		\|a Choi, Pamela M. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Gollin, Gerald \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370 \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of surgical research \|d Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961 \|g 295, Seite 296-301 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)267836821 \|w (DE-600)1470806-1 \|w (DE-576)104193948 \|x 1095-8673 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:295 \|g pages:296-301
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 44.65 \|j Chirurgie \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 295 \|h 296-301

Indexfelder

author_variant	m g mg p m c pm pmc g g gg
matchkey_str	article:10958673:2023----::rmraatmssesstmfrugclertznetrclt
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	44.65
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005 doi (DE-627)ELV067149715 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Goldfarb, Madeline verfasserin aut Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently. Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery Choi, Pamela M. verfasserin aut Gollin, Gerald verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370 aut Enthalten in Journal of surgical research Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961 295, Seite 296-301 Online-Ressource (DE-627)267836821 (DE-600)1470806-1 (DE-576)104193948 1095-8673 nnns volume:295 pages:296-301 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 295 296-301
spelling	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005 doi (DE-627)ELV067149715 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Goldfarb, Madeline verfasserin aut Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently. Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery Choi, Pamela M. verfasserin aut Gollin, Gerald verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370 aut Enthalten in Journal of surgical research Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961 295, Seite 296-301 Online-Ressource (DE-627)267836821 (DE-600)1470806-1 (DE-576)104193948 1095-8673 nnns volume:295 pages:296-301 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 295 296-301
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005 doi (DE-627)ELV067149715 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Goldfarb, Madeline verfasserin aut Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently. Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery Choi, Pamela M. verfasserin aut Gollin, Gerald verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370 aut Enthalten in Journal of surgical research Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961 295, Seite 296-301 Online-Ressource (DE-627)267836821 (DE-600)1470806-1 (DE-576)104193948 1095-8673 nnns volume:295 pages:296-301 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 295 296-301
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005 doi (DE-627)ELV067149715 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Goldfarb, Madeline verfasserin aut Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently. Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery Choi, Pamela M. verfasserin aut Gollin, Gerald verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370 aut Enthalten in Journal of surgical research Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961 295, Seite 296-301 Online-Ressource (DE-627)267836821 (DE-600)1470806-1 (DE-576)104193948 1095-8673 nnns volume:295 pages:296-301 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 295 296-301
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005 doi (DE-627)ELV067149715 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 VZ 44.65 bkl Goldfarb, Madeline verfasserin aut Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently. Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery Choi, Pamela M. verfasserin aut Gollin, Gerald verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370 aut Enthalten in Journal of surgical research Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961 295, Seite 296-301 Online-Ressource (DE-627)267836821 (DE-600)1470806-1 (DE-576)104193948 1095-8673 nnns volume:295 pages:296-301 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.65 Chirurgie VZ AR 295 296-301
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of surgical research 295, Seite 296-301 volume:295 pages:296-301
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of surgical research 295, Seite 296-301 volume:295 pages:296-301
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Chirurgie
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of surgical research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Goldfarb, Madeline @@aut@@ Choi, Pamela M. @@aut@@ Gollin, Gerald @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	267836821
dewey-sort	3610
id	ELV067149715
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV067149715</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240222093154.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240222s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV067149715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldfarb, Madeline</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anastomosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Necrotizing enterocolitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Pamela M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gollin, Gerald</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of surgical research</subfield><subfield code="d">Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961</subfield><subfield code="g">295, Seite 296-301</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)267836821</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1470806-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)104193948</subfield><subfield code="x">1095-8673</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:295</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:296-301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">295</subfield><subfield code="h">296-301</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Goldfarb, Madeline
spellingShingle	Goldfarb, Madeline ddc 610 bkl 44.65 misc Anastomosis misc Necrotizing enterocolitis misc Outcomes misc Stoma misc Surgery Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals
authorStr	Goldfarb, Madeline
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)267836821
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1095-8673
topic_title	610 VZ 44.65 bkl Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals Anastomosis Necrotizing enterocolitis Outcomes Stoma Surgery
topic	ddc 610 bkl 44.65 misc Anastomosis misc Necrotizing enterocolitis misc Outcomes misc Stoma misc Surgery
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 bkl 44.65 misc Anastomosis misc Necrotizing enterocolitis misc Outcomes misc Stoma misc Surgery
topic_browse	ddc 610 bkl 44.65 misc Anastomosis misc Necrotizing enterocolitis misc Outcomes misc Stoma misc Surgery
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of surgical research
hierarchy_parent_id	267836821
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of surgical research
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)267836821 (DE-600)1470806-1 (DE-576)104193948
title	Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV067149715 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X
title_full	Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals
author_sort	Goldfarb, Madeline
journal	Journal of surgical research
journalStr	Journal of surgical research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	296
author_browse	Goldfarb, Madeline Choi, Pamela M. Gollin, Gerald
container_volume	295
class	610 VZ 44.65 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Goldfarb, Madeline
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-4642-3370
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370
dewey-full	610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	primary anastomosis versus stoma for surgical necrotizing enterocolitis in us children's hospitals
title_auth	Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals
abstract	Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently.
abstractGer	Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently.
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals
remote_bool	true
author2	Choi, Pamela M. Gollin, Gerald
author2Str	Choi, Pamela M. Gollin, Gerald
ppnlink	267836821
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005
up_date	2024-07-06T20:16:17.089Z
_version_	1803862123051220992
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV067149715</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240222093154.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240222s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV067149715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-4804(23)00567-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldfarb, Madeline</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Multiple studies have documented the safety of intestinal anastomosis after resection for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We sought to evaluate a large population of infants with surgical NEC and assess outcomes after primary anastomosis versus enterostomy.Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify infants with Bell Stage 3 NEC who underwent an intestinal resection for acute disease between 2016 and 2021. Demographics and preoperative physiology were assessed, and nutritional, infectious, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.Results: Two hundred twenty-two infants at 38 children's hospitals were included. Thirty-five (15.8%) were managed with a primary anastomosis. Among infants who underwent a resection within 10 d of their first operative intervention and survived for at least 3 d, a primary anastomosis was used in 26 (13.7%). These patients were older but had similar weight and physiological status at the time of resection as those managed with an enterostomy. The incidence of wound and infectious complications, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of stay were similar after anastomosis or enterostomy.Conclusions: In a large, geographically heterogenous population of infants with NEC, only 15.8% were managed with a primary anastomosis after intestinal resection. Survivors who underwent resection within 10 d were demographically and physiologically comparable to those who underwent enterostomy and had similar surgical outcomes. While there are clearly indications for enterostomy in some infants with NEC, these data confirm the conclusions of smaller, single-center studies that a primary anastomosis should be considered more frequently.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anastomosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Necrotizing enterocolitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Pamela M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gollin, Gerald</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4642-3370</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of surgical research</subfield><subfield code="d">Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, 1961</subfield><subfield code="g">295, Seite 296-301</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)267836821</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1470806-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)104193948</subfield><subfield code="x">1095-8673</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:295</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:296-301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.65</subfield><subfield code="j">Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">295</subfield><subfield code="h">296-301</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402236

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Primary Anastomosis Versus Stoma for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis in US Children's Hospitals

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?