Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction
In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant p...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1969 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
14 Ill. ; 3 Tab. 20 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:1969 ; month:02 ; pages:383-402 ; extent:20 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ160165539 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ160165539 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707025733.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070201s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ160165539 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1969 | |
| 300 | |b 14 Ill. |b 3 Tab. | ||
| 300 | |a 20 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. | ||
| 533 | |f Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Homsy, C. A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fissette, J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Watkins, W. S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Williams, H. O. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Freeman, B. S. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley |g 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 |w (DE-627)NLEJ159070848 |w (DE-600)2176174-7 |x 0021-9304 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:1969 |g month:02 |g pages:383-402 |g extent:20 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 |q text/html |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-WIS | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 1969 |c 2 |h 383-402 |g 20 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:00219304:1969----::ugcluueocnsbuiuats |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1969 |
| publishDate |
1969 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ160165539 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction 1969 14 Ill. 3 Tab. 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 Homsy, C. A. oth Fissette, J. oth Watkins, W. S. oth Williams, H. O. oth Freeman, B. S. oth in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 (DE-627)NLEJ159070848 (DE-600)2176174-7 0021-9304 nnns volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 text/html Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-WIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 1969 2 383-402 20 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ160165539 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction 1969 14 Ill. 3 Tab. 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 Homsy, C. A. oth Fissette, J. oth Watkins, W. S. oth Williams, H. O. oth Freeman, B. S. oth in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 (DE-627)NLEJ159070848 (DE-600)2176174-7 0021-9304 nnns volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 text/html Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-WIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 1969 2 383-402 20 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ160165539 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction 1969 14 Ill. 3 Tab. 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 Homsy, C. A. oth Fissette, J. oth Watkins, W. S. oth Williams, H. O. oth Freeman, B. S. oth in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 (DE-627)NLEJ159070848 (DE-600)2176174-7 0021-9304 nnns volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 text/html Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-WIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 1969 2 383-402 20 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ160165539 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction 1969 14 Ill. 3 Tab. 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 Homsy, C. A. oth Fissette, J. oth Watkins, W. S. oth Williams, H. O. oth Freeman, B. S. oth in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 (DE-627)NLEJ159070848 (DE-600)2176174-7 0021-9304 nnns volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 text/html Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-WIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 1969 2 383-402 20 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ160165539 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction 1969 14 Ill. 3 Tab. 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 Homsy, C. A. oth Fissette, J. oth Watkins, W. S. oth Williams, H. O. oth Freeman, B. S. oth in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 (DE-627)NLEJ159070848 (DE-600)2176174-7 0021-9304 nnns volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 text/html Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-WIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 1969 2 383-402 20 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 |
| sourceStr |
in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402 volume:3 year:1969 month:02 pages:383-402 extent:20 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Homsy, C. A. @@oth@@ Fissette, J. @@oth@@ Watkins, W. S. @@oth@@ Williams, H. O. @@oth@@ Freeman, B. S. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1969-02-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ159070848 |
| id |
NLEJ160165539 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ160165539</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707025733.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070201s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ160165539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">14 Ill.</subfield><subfield code="b">3 Tab.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Homsy, C. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fissette, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Watkins, W. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, H. O.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freeman, B. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Biomedical Materials Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley</subfield><subfield code="g">3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ159070848</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2176174-7</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-9304</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1969</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:383-402</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">1969</subfield><subfield code="c">2</subfield><subfield code="h">383-402</subfield><subfield code="g">20</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ159070848 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Illustrated |
| issn |
0021-9304 |
| topic_title |
Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
c a h ca cah j f jf w s w ws wsw h o w ho how b s f bs bsf |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ159070848 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ159070848 (DE-600)2176174-7 |
| title |
Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| spellingShingle |
Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ160165539 |
| title_full |
Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| journal |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |
| journalStr |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1969 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
383 |
| container_volume |
3 |
| physical |
14 Ill. 3 Tab. 20 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| title_auth |
Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| abstract |
In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. |
| abstractGer |
In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-WIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| title_short |
Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Homsy, C. A. Fissette, J. Watkins, W. S. Williams, H. O. Freeman, B. S. |
| author2Str |
Homsy, C. A. Fissette, J. Watkins, W. S. Williams, H. O. Freeman, B. S. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ159070848 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-05T23:45:46.089Z |
| _version_ |
1803784705636564992 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ160165539</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707025733.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070201s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ160165539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgical suture-porcine subcuticular tissue interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">14 Ill.</subfield><subfield code="b">3 Tab.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study tissue-suture interaction was evaluated in terms of instantaneous stress and total work at withdrawal, histological response, and photomicrographic suture appearance. Porcine subjects and subcuticular incision closures identical to those of clinical plastic surgery were used; implant periods were 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Monofilamentary sutures (4-0) of nylon, linear polyethylene, polypropylene, and Teflon FEP were used; stainless steel and braided siliconized silk were included for comparison. Perisutural sleeves, formed by ingrowth of epithelium up to 1 cm from the loci of emergence of the suture through epidermis, were found to account for 70-85% of withdrawal work. The subcutaneous closure is superior to interrupted or running stitches in minimizing these “end effects” and attendant exacerbation of tissue-suture interaction. The degree of the latter combined with consideration of suture strength, suppleness, and knot durability indicate that nylon and Teflon FEP monofilaments are sutures of choice for cutaneous closure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Homsy, C. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fissette, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Watkins, W. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, H. O.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freeman, B. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Biomedical Materials Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley</subfield><subfield code="g">3(1969) vom: Feb., Seite 383-402</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ159070848</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2176174-7</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-9304</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1969</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:383-402</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820030216</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">1969</subfield><subfield code="c">2</subfield><subfield code="h">383-402</subfield><subfield code="g">20</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3981867 |