The ability to reason about movement in the visual field
In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1988 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Intelligence - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:1988 ; number:1 ; pages:77-100 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ182204642 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ182204642 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706172511.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070505s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ182204642 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1988 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. | ||
| 533 | |f Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hunt, E. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pellegrino, J.W. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Frick, R.W. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Farr, S.A. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alderton, D. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Intelligence |d Amsterdam : Elsevier |g 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 |w (DE-627)NLEJ177077972 |w (DE-600)2013999-8 |x 0160-2896 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1988 |g number:1 |g pages:77-100 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_H | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SDJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 1988 |e 1 |h 77-100 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:01602896:1988----::haiiyoesnbumvmni |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1988 |
| publishDate |
1988 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ182204642 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The ability to reason about movement in the visual field 1988 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Hunt, E. oth Pellegrino, J.W. oth Frick, R.W. oth Farr, S.A. oth Alderton, D. oth in Intelligence Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 (DE-627)NLEJ177077972 (DE-600)2013999-8 0160-2896 nnns volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1988 1 77-100 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ182204642 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The ability to reason about movement in the visual field 1988 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Hunt, E. oth Pellegrino, J.W. oth Frick, R.W. oth Farr, S.A. oth Alderton, D. oth in Intelligence Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 (DE-627)NLEJ177077972 (DE-600)2013999-8 0160-2896 nnns volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1988 1 77-100 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ182204642 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The ability to reason about movement in the visual field 1988 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Hunt, E. oth Pellegrino, J.W. oth Frick, R.W. oth Farr, S.A. oth Alderton, D. oth in Intelligence Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 (DE-627)NLEJ177077972 (DE-600)2013999-8 0160-2896 nnns volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1988 1 77-100 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ182204642 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The ability to reason about movement in the visual field 1988 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Hunt, E. oth Pellegrino, J.W. oth Frick, R.W. oth Farr, S.A. oth Alderton, D. oth in Intelligence Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 (DE-627)NLEJ177077972 (DE-600)2013999-8 0160-2896 nnns volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1988 1 77-100 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ182204642 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The ability to reason about movement in the visual field 1988 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Hunt, E. oth Pellegrino, J.W. oth Frick, R.W. oth Farr, S.A. oth Alderton, D. oth in Intelligence Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 (DE-627)NLEJ177077972 (DE-600)2013999-8 0160-2896 nnns volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1988 1 77-100 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Intelligence 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 |
| sourceStr |
in Intelligence 12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100 volume:12 year:1988 number:1 pages:77-100 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Intelligence |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hunt, E. @@oth@@ Pellegrino, J.W. @@oth@@ Frick, R.W. @@oth@@ Farr, S.A. @@oth@@ Alderton, D. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1988-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ177077972 |
| id |
NLEJ182204642 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ182204642</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706172511.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070505s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ182204642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The ability to reason about movement in the visual field</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hunt, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pellegrino, J.W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frick, R.W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Farr, S.A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alderton, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Intelligence</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ177077972</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013999-8</subfield><subfield code="x">0160-2896</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:77-100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">77-100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ177077972 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0160-2896 |
| topic_title |
The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
e h eh j p jp r f rf s f sf d a da |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Intelligence |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ177077972 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Intelligence |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ177077972 (DE-600)2013999-8 |
| title |
The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| spellingShingle |
The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ182204642 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642 |
| title_full |
The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| journal |
Intelligence |
| journalStr |
Intelligence |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1988 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
77 |
| container_volume |
12 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| title_auth |
The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| abstract |
In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. |
| abstractGer |
In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The ability to reason about movement in the visual field |
| url |
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Hunt, E. Pellegrino, J.W. Frick, R.W. Farr, S.A. Alderton, D. |
| author2Str |
Hunt, E. Pellegrino, J.W. Frick, R.W. Farr, S.A. Alderton, D. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ177077972 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T08:36:02.684Z |
| _version_ |
1803818067752386560 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ182204642</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706172511.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070505s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ182204642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ182204642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The ability to reason about movement in the visual field</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In tests of visual-spatial reasoning, the examinee must reason about some aspect of a picture. Because of the limitations of paper-and-pencil tests, the picture do not contain any moving elements. These are referred to as static displays. Outside the test situation, people frequently have to reason about visual displays that contain moving elements. These will be called dynamic displays. This experiment investigated whether or not individual differences in the ability to reason about dynamic displays are predictable from tests using static displays. One hundred and seventy people were given a battery of tests, including six standard paper-and-pencil tests of visual-spatial ability, five computer-controlled tests using static displays, and six computer-controlled tests using dynamic displays. Several multivariate analyses indicated that the ability to reason about dynamic visual motion is distinct from the ability to reason about static displays.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hunt, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pellegrino, J.W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frick, R.W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Farr, S.A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alderton, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Intelligence</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">12(1988), 1, Seite 77-100</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ177077972</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013999-8</subfield><subfield code="x">0160-2896</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:77-100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0160-2896(88)90024-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">77-100</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3987026 |