Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind
This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. A...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1983 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Poetics - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:1983 ; number:2-3 ; pages:165-183 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ182727661 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ182727661 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706183933.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070505s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ182727661 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1983 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. | ||
| 533 | |f Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Pfeiffer, K.L. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Poetics |d Amsterdam : Elsevier |g 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 |w (DE-627)NLEJ18272526X |w (DE-600)1481242-3 |x 0304-422X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1983 |g number:2-3 |g pages:165-183 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_H | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SDJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 1983 |e 2-3 |h 165-183 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:0304422X:1983----::nepeainnhoooynte |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1983 |
| publishDate |
1983 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ182727661 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind 1983 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Pfeiffer, K.L. oth in Poetics Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)NLEJ18272526X (DE-600)1481242-3 0304-422X nnns volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1983 2-3 165-183 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ182727661 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind 1983 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Pfeiffer, K.L. oth in Poetics Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)NLEJ18272526X (DE-600)1481242-3 0304-422X nnns volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1983 2-3 165-183 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ182727661 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind 1983 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Pfeiffer, K.L. oth in Poetics Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)NLEJ18272526X (DE-600)1481242-3 0304-422X nnns volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1983 2-3 165-183 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ182727661 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind 1983 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Pfeiffer, K.L. oth in Poetics Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)NLEJ18272526X (DE-600)1481242-3 0304-422X nnns volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1983 2-3 165-183 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ182727661 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind 1983 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Pfeiffer, K.L. oth in Poetics Amsterdam : Elsevier 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)NLEJ18272526X (DE-600)1481242-3 0304-422X nnns volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1983 2-3 165-183 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Poetics 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 |
| sourceStr |
in Poetics 12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183 volume:12 year:1983 number:2-3 pages:165-183 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Poetics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pfeiffer, K.L. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1983-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ18272526X |
| id |
NLEJ182727661 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ182727661</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706183933.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070505s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ182727661</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pfeiffer, K.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Poetics</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ18272526X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1481242-3</subfield><subfield code="x">0304-422X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1983</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:165-183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">1983</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">165-183</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ182727661</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706183933.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070505s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ182727661</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pfeiffer, K.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Poetics</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">12(1983), 2-3, Seite 165-183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ18272526X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1481242-3</subfield><subfield code="x">0304-422X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1983</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:165-183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">1983</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">165-183</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ18272526X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0304-422X |
| topic_title |
Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k p kp |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Poetics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ18272526X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Poetics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ18272526X (DE-600)1481242-3 |
| title |
Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| spellingShingle |
Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ182727661 (DE-599)GBVNLZ182727661 |
| title_full |
Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| journal |
Poetics |
| journalStr |
Poetics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1983 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
165 |
| container_volume |
12 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
interpretation: anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| title_auth |
Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| abstract |
This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. |
| abstractGer |
This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This article argues mainly along semantic and anthropological lines. A semantic framework is used in order to introduce a general concept of interpretation, more particularly in order to establish the necessity, extent and risks invilved in interpretational activities on different symbolic levels. An anthropological framework is introduced in order to evaluate the possibility of balancing the methodological weak points of literary interpretation and the communicative values it may yield. An effort is made to substantiate this dual approach by an assessment of prevalent concepts of literature and of critical pluralism. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2-3 |
| title_short |
Interpretation: Anthropology and the ecology of mind |
| url |
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0304-422X(83)90026-8 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Pfeiffer, K.L. |
| author2Str |
Pfeiffer, K.L. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ18272526X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T09:39:59.160Z |
| _version_ |
1803822090595336192 |
| score |
7.399315 |