The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment
This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1981 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Developmental Review - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:1981 ; number:4 ; pages:322-329 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ184526825 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ184526825 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706232824.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070506s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ184526825 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1981 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. | ||
| 533 | |f Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Zimmerman, M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Developmental Review |d Amsterdam : Elsevier |g 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 |w (DE-627)NLEJ177079339 |w (DE-600)1463213-5 |x 0273-2297 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:1981 |g number:4 |g pages:322-329 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_H | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SDJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 1981 |e 4 |h 322-329 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:02732297:1981----::hhmosrainomaueetfhevrnetrjidrol |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1981 |
| publishDate |
1981 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ184526825 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment 1981 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zimmerman, M. oth in Developmental Review Amsterdam : Elsevier 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 (DE-627)NLEJ177079339 (DE-600)1463213-5 0273-2297 nnns volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 1981 4 322-329 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ184526825 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment 1981 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zimmerman, M. oth in Developmental Review Amsterdam : Elsevier 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 (DE-627)NLEJ177079339 (DE-600)1463213-5 0273-2297 nnns volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 1981 4 322-329 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ184526825 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment 1981 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zimmerman, M. oth in Developmental Review Amsterdam : Elsevier 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 (DE-627)NLEJ177079339 (DE-600)1463213-5 0273-2297 nnns volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 1981 4 322-329 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ184526825 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment 1981 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zimmerman, M. oth in Developmental Review Amsterdam : Elsevier 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 (DE-627)NLEJ177079339 (DE-600)1463213-5 0273-2297 nnns volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 1981 4 322-329 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ184526825 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment 1981 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zimmerman, M. oth in Developmental Review Amsterdam : Elsevier 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 (DE-627)NLEJ177079339 (DE-600)1463213-5 0273-2297 nnns volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 1981 4 322-329 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Developmental Review 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 |
| sourceStr |
in Developmental Review 1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329 volume:1 year:1981 number:4 pages:322-329 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Developmental Review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zimmerman, M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1981-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ177079339 |
| id |
NLEJ184526825 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ184526825</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706232824.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070506s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ184526825</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zimmerman, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Developmental Review</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ177079339</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1463213-5</subfield><subfield code="x">0273-2297</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1981</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:322-329</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">1981</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">322-329</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ184526825</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706232824.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070506s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ184526825</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zimmerman, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Developmental Review</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">1(1981), 4, Seite 322-329</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ177079339</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1463213-5</subfield><subfield code="x">0273-2297</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1981</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:322-329</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">1981</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">322-329</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ177079339 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0273-2297 |
| topic_title |
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m z mz |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Developmental Review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ177079339 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Developmental Review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ177079339 (DE-600)1463213-5 |
| title |
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| spellingShingle |
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ184526825 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184526825 |
| title_full |
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| journal |
Developmental Review |
| journalStr |
Developmental Review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1981 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
322 |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
home observation for measurement of the environment: a rejoinder to elardo and bradley's comment |
| title_auth |
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| abstract |
This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. |
| abstractGer |
This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This paper is a rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment upon my paper which critiqued their literature review of the research using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scale. A summary of both the 16 critical points which I originally raised and their comments on 12 of these issues is presented. Two issues are discussed in some depth: (1) the calculation of the specificity of an instrument, and (2) the reason I included a section on genetic-environment confounding in my initial critique despite the appearance of a similarly worded section in Elardo and Bradley's original review. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: A rejoinder to Elardo and Bradley's comment |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90028-9 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Zimmerman, M. |
| author2Str |
Zimmerman, M. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ177079339 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T01:34:37.699Z |
| _version_ |
1803791554527100928 |
| score |
7.397464 |