Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes
In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1994 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Learning and Motivation - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:1994 ; number:3 ; pages:233-244 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ184589959 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ184589959 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706233832.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070506s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ184589959 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1994 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. | ||
| 533 | |f Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Y.L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Riccio, D.C. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Learning and Motivation |d Amsterdam : Elsevier |g 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 |w (DE-627)NLEJ184589940 |w (DE-600)1470978-8 |x 0023-9690 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:1994 |g number:3 |g pages:233-244 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_H | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SDJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 1994 |e 3 |h 233-244 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:00239690:1994----::rtscigaalvaehfretnocneta |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1994 |
| publishDate |
1994 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589959 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes 1994 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zhou, Y.L. oth Riccio, D.C. oth in Learning and Motivation Amsterdam : Elsevier 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 (DE-627)NLEJ184589940 (DE-600)1470978-8 0023-9690 nnns volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 25 1994 3 233-244 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589959 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes 1994 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zhou, Y.L. oth Riccio, D.C. oth in Learning and Motivation Amsterdam : Elsevier 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 (DE-627)NLEJ184589940 (DE-600)1470978-8 0023-9690 nnns volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 25 1994 3 233-244 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589959 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes 1994 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zhou, Y.L. oth Riccio, D.C. oth in Learning and Motivation Amsterdam : Elsevier 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 (DE-627)NLEJ184589940 (DE-600)1470978-8 0023-9690 nnns volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 25 1994 3 233-244 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589959 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes 1994 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zhou, Y.L. oth Riccio, D.C. oth in Learning and Motivation Amsterdam : Elsevier 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 (DE-627)NLEJ184589940 (DE-600)1470978-8 0023-9690 nnns volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 25 1994 3 233-244 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589959 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes 1994 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 Zhou, Y.L. oth Riccio, D.C. oth in Learning and Motivation Amsterdam : Elsevier 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 (DE-627)NLEJ184589940 (DE-600)1470978-8 0023-9690 nnns volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 25 1994 3 233-244 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Learning and Motivation 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 |
| sourceStr |
in Learning and Motivation 25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244 volume:25 year:1994 number:3 pages:233-244 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Learning and Motivation |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zhou, Y.L. @@oth@@ Riccio, D.C. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1994-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ184589940 |
| id |
NLEJ184589959 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ184589959</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706233832.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070506s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ184589959</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Y.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riccio, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Learning and Motivation</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ184589940</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1470978-8</subfield><subfield code="x">0023-9690</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1994</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:233-244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">1994</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">233-244</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ184589940 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0023-9690 |
| topic_title |
Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
y z yz d r dr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Learning and Motivation |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ184589940 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Learning and Motivation |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589940 (DE-600)1470978-8 |
| title |
Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| spellingShingle |
Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ184589959 (DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959 |
| title_full |
Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| journal |
Learning and Motivation |
| journalStr |
Learning and Motivation |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1994 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
233 |
| container_volume |
25 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
pretest cuing can alleviate the forgetting of contextual stimulus attributes |
| title_auth |
Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| abstract |
In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. |
| abstractGer |
In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_H ZDB-1-SDJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Zhou, Y.L. Riccio, D.C. |
| author2Str |
Zhou, Y.L. Riccio, D.C. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ184589940 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T01:46:00.375Z |
| _version_ |
1803792270361624576 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ184589959</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706233832.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070506s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ184589959</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLZ184589959</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pretest Cuing Can Alleviate the Forgetting of Contextual Stimulus Attributes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In two experiments, the reversibility of forgetting of stimulus attributes was investigated in rats. Experiment 1 found that when the subjects had forgotten details of stimulus attributes 1 week after training in a Pavlovian differential fear-conditioning task, a cuing treatment, i.e., exposure to the training context, led to a strong context shift effect (short test latency) again. Experiment 2 indicated that the duration of the reactivated memory for the training context was relatively short. When the subjects were tested to the generalized contextual stimulus (shifted room) within 30 min after cuing treatment, they readily discriminated the stimulus change, as seen in a strong context shift effect. However, when the cuing-test interval was lengthened to more than 60 min, the context shift effect was no longer observed, indicating a loss of the reminder effect. These results suggest that forgetting of stimulus attributes may be due to a retrieval deficit, which can be alleviated by a pretest cuing treatment, and that the effectiveness of the cuing treatment on forgetting of stimulus attributes is time-dependent. Thus, forgetting of stimulus attributes may share a common mechanism with the forgetting of a target response.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Y.L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riccio, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Learning and Motivation</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="g">25(1994), 3, Seite 233-244</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ184589940</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1470978-8</subfield><subfield code="x">0023-9690</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1994</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:233-244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SDJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">1994</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">233-244</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400591 |