Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent
Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consen...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2000 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
13 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Health care analysis - 1993, 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2000 ; month:01 ; pages:41-53 ; extent:13 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ194155714 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ194155714 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707223606.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070526s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ194155714 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2000 | |
| 300 | |a 13 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. | ||
| 533 | |f Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hutton, Jane L. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ashcroft, Richard E. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Health care analysis |d 1993 |g 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 |w (DE-627)NLEJ188995463 |w (DE-600)2005104-9 |x 1573-3394 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2000 |g month:01 |g pages:41-53 |g extent:13 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SOJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 2000 |c 1 |h 41-53 |g 13 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:15733394:2000----::oeouavrinouif |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2000 |
| publishDate |
2000 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ194155714 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent 2000 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Hutton, Jane L. oth Ashcroft, Richard E. oth in Health care analysis 1993 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 (DE-627)NLEJ188995463 (DE-600)2005104-9 1573-3394 nnns volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 1 41-53 13 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ194155714 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent 2000 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Hutton, Jane L. oth Ashcroft, Richard E. oth in Health care analysis 1993 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 (DE-627)NLEJ188995463 (DE-600)2005104-9 1573-3394 nnns volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 1 41-53 13 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ194155714 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent 2000 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Hutton, Jane L. oth Ashcroft, Richard E. oth in Health care analysis 1993 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 (DE-627)NLEJ188995463 (DE-600)2005104-9 1573-3394 nnns volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 1 41-53 13 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ194155714 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent 2000 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Hutton, Jane L. oth Ashcroft, Richard E. oth in Health care analysis 1993 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 (DE-627)NLEJ188995463 (DE-600)2005104-9 1573-3394 nnns volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 1 41-53 13 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ194155714 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent 2000 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Hutton, Jane L. oth Ashcroft, Richard E. oth in Health care analysis 1993 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 (DE-627)NLEJ188995463 (DE-600)2005104-9 1573-3394 nnns volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 1 41-53 13 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Health care analysis 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 |
| sourceStr |
in Health care analysis 8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53 volume:8 year:2000 month:01 pages:41-53 extent:13 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Health care analysis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hutton, Jane L. @@oth@@ Ashcroft, Richard E. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2000-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ188995463 |
| id |
NLEJ194155714 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ194155714</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707223606.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070526s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ194155714</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hutton, Jane L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ashcroft, Richard E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Health care analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">1993</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188995463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2005104-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-3394</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:41-53</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="c">1</subfield><subfield code="h">41-53</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ188995463 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1573-3394 |
| topic_title |
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j l h jl jlh r e a re rea |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Health care analysis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ188995463 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Health care analysis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ188995463 (DE-600)2005104-9 |
| title |
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| spellingShingle |
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ194155714 |
| title_full |
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| journal |
Health care analysis |
| journalStr |
Health care analysis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2000 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
41 |
| container_volume |
8 |
| physical |
13 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
some popular versions of uninformed consent |
| title_auth |
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| abstract |
Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| title_short |
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Hutton, Jane L. Ashcroft, Richard E. |
| author2Str |
Hutton, Jane L. Ashcroft, Richard E. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ188995463 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-05T23:53:00.888Z |
| _version_ |
1803785161556361216 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ194155714</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707223606.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070526s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ194155714</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are discussed. The selection by doctors of patients, to whom entry to trials will be offered, is explored. Alternative forms of consent require restrictions on patients' knowledge, personal responsibility and freedom of choice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hutton, Jane L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ashcroft, Richard E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Health care analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">1993</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2000) vom: Jan., Seite 41-53</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188995463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2005104-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-3394</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:41-53</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421824028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="c">1</subfield><subfield code="h">41-53</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398122 |