Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures
Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1993 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Quality of life research - 1992, 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:1993 ; month:06 ; pages:467-475 ; extent:9 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ195670388 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ195670388 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210708012909.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070526s1993 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ195670388 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1993 | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. | ||
| 533 | |f Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Kaplan, R. M. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feeny, D. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Revicki, D. A. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Quality of life research |d 1992 |g 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 |w (DE-627)NLEJ188989161 |w (DE-600)2008960-0 |x 1573-2649 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:1993 |g month:06 |g pages:467-475 |g extent:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SOJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 2 |j 1993 |c 6 |h 467-475 |g 9 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:15732649:1993----::ehdfrsesnrltvipracipeeecb |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1993 |
| publishDate |
1993 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ195670388 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures 1993 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Kaplan, R. M. oth Feeny, D. oth Revicki, D. A. oth in Quality of life research 1992 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 (DE-627)NLEJ188989161 (DE-600)2008960-0 1573-2649 nnns volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 1993 6 467-475 9 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ195670388 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures 1993 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Kaplan, R. M. oth Feeny, D. oth Revicki, D. A. oth in Quality of life research 1992 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 (DE-627)NLEJ188989161 (DE-600)2008960-0 1573-2649 nnns volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 1993 6 467-475 9 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ195670388 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures 1993 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Kaplan, R. M. oth Feeny, D. oth Revicki, D. A. oth in Quality of life research 1992 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 (DE-627)NLEJ188989161 (DE-600)2008960-0 1573-2649 nnns volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 1993 6 467-475 9 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ195670388 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures 1993 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Kaplan, R. M. oth Feeny, D. oth Revicki, D. A. oth in Quality of life research 1992 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 (DE-627)NLEJ188989161 (DE-600)2008960-0 1573-2649 nnns volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 1993 6 467-475 9 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ195670388 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures 1993 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Kaplan, R. M. oth Feeny, D. oth Revicki, D. A. oth in Quality of life research 1992 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 (DE-627)NLEJ188989161 (DE-600)2008960-0 1573-2649 nnns volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 1993 6 467-475 9 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Quality of life research 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 |
| sourceStr |
in Quality of life research 2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475 volume:2 year:1993 month:06 pages:467-475 extent:9 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Quality of life research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kaplan, R. M. @@oth@@ Feeny, D. @@oth@@ Revicki, D. A. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1993-06-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ188989161 |
| id |
NLEJ195670388 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ195670388</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210708012909.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070526s1993 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ195670388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaplan, R. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feeny, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Revicki, D. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Quality of life research</subfield><subfield code="d">1992</subfield><subfield code="g">2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188989161</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2008960-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-2649</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1993</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:467-475</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">1993</subfield><subfield code="c">6</subfield><subfield code="h">467-475</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ188989161 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1573-2649 |
| topic_title |
Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r m k rm rmk d f df d a r da dar |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Quality of life research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ188989161 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Quality of life research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ188989161 (DE-600)2008960-0 |
| title |
Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| spellingShingle |
Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ195670388 |
| title_full |
Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| journal |
Quality of life research |
| journalStr |
Quality of life research |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1993 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
467 |
| container_volume |
2 |
| physical |
9 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| title_auth |
Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| abstract |
Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| title_short |
Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Kaplan, R. M. Feeny, D. Revicki, D. A. |
| author2Str |
Kaplan, R. M. Feeny, D. Revicki, D. A. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ188989161 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T04:23:21.905Z |
| _version_ |
1803802170522337280 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ195670388</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210708012909.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070526s1993 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ195670388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper reviews issues relevant to preference assessment for utility based measures of health-related quality of life. Cost/utility studies require a common measurement of health outcome, such as the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A key element in the QALY methodology is the measure of preference that estimates subjective health quality. Economists and psychologists differ on their preferred approach to preference measurement. Economists rely on utility assessment methods that formally consider economic trades. These methods include the standard gamble, time-trade off and person trade-off. However, some evidence suggests that many of the assumptions that underlie economic measurements of choice are open to challenge because human information processors do poorly at integrating complex probability information when making decisions that involve risk. Further, economic analysis assumes that choices accurately correspond to the way rational humans use information. Psychology experiments suggest that methods commonly used for economic analysis do not represent the underlying true preference continuum and some evidence supports the use of simple rating scales. More recent research by economists attempts integrated cognitive models, while contemporary research by psychologists considers economic models of choice. The review also suggests that difference in preference between different social groups tends to be small.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaplan, R. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feeny, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Revicki, D. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Quality of life research</subfield><subfield code="d">1992</subfield><subfield code="g">2(1993) vom: Juni, Seite 467-475</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188989161</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2008960-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-2649</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1993</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:467-475</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00422221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">1993</subfield><subfield code="c">6</subfield><subfield code="h">467-475</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399806 |