Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy?
Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were fo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
1981 |
---|
Umfang: |
10 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Sex roles - 1975, 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:1981 ; month:08 ; pages:775-784 ; extent:10 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ19723920X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ19723920X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210705211301.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 070527s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ19723920X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
264 | 1 | |c 1981 | |
300 | |a 10 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. | ||
533 | |f Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 | ||
700 | 1 | |a Boersma, P. Dee |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gay, Debora |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Jones, Ruth A. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Morrison, Lynn |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Remick, Helen |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Sex roles |d 1975 |g 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 |w (DE-627)NLEJ188984372 |w (DE-600)2018681-2 |x 1573-2762 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:1981 |g month:08 |g pages:775-784 |g extent:10 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-SOJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 7 |j 1981 |c 8 |h 775-784 |g 10 |
matchkey_str |
article:15732762:1981----::edfeecsnolgsueteceitrc |
---|---|
hierarchy_sort_str |
1981 |
publishDate |
1981 |
allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? 1981 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Boersma, P. Dee oth Gay, Debora oth Jones, Ruth A. oth Morrison, Lynn oth Remick, Helen oth in Sex roles 1975 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 (DE-627)NLEJ188984372 (DE-600)2018681-2 1573-2762 nnns volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1981 8 775-784 10 |
spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? 1981 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Boersma, P. Dee oth Gay, Debora oth Jones, Ruth A. oth Morrison, Lynn oth Remick, Helen oth in Sex roles 1975 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 (DE-627)NLEJ188984372 (DE-600)2018681-2 1573-2762 nnns volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1981 8 775-784 10 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? 1981 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Boersma, P. Dee oth Gay, Debora oth Jones, Ruth A. oth Morrison, Lynn oth Remick, Helen oth in Sex roles 1975 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 (DE-627)NLEJ188984372 (DE-600)2018681-2 1573-2762 nnns volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1981 8 775-784 10 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? 1981 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Boersma, P. Dee oth Gay, Debora oth Jones, Ruth A. oth Morrison, Lynn oth Remick, Helen oth in Sex roles 1975 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 (DE-627)NLEJ188984372 (DE-600)2018681-2 1573-2762 nnns volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1981 8 775-784 10 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? 1981 10 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Boersma, P. Dee oth Gay, Debora oth Jones, Ruth A. oth Morrison, Lynn oth Remick, Helen oth in Sex roles 1975 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 (DE-627)NLEJ188984372 (DE-600)2018681-2 1573-2762 nnns volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1981 8 775-784 10 |
language |
English |
source |
in Sex roles 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 |
sourceStr |
in Sex roles 7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784 volume:7 year:1981 month:08 pages:775-784 extent:10 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Sex roles |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Boersma, P. Dee @@oth@@ Gay, Debora @@oth@@ Jones, Ruth A. @@oth@@ Morrison, Lynn @@oth@@ Remick, Helen @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1981-08-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ188984372 |
id |
NLEJ19723920X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ19723920X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210705211301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070527s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boersma, P. Dee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gay, Debora</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Ruth A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morrison, Lynn</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Remick, Helen</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Sex roles</subfield><subfield code="d">1975</subfield><subfield code="g">7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188984372</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2018681-2</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-2762</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1981</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:775-784</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">1981</subfield><subfield code="c">8</subfield><subfield code="h">775-784</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ188984372 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1573-2762 |
topic_title |
Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
p d b pd pdb d g dg r a j ra raj l m lm h r hr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Sex roles |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ188984372 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Sex roles |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ188984372 (DE-600)2018681-2 |
title |
Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
spellingShingle |
Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X |
title_full |
Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
journal |
Sex roles |
journalStr |
Sex roles |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1981 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
775 |
container_volume |
7 |
physical |
10 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
title_sort |
sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: fact or fantasy? |
title_auth |
Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
abstract |
Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. |
abstractGer |
Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
title_short |
Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy? |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Boersma, P. Dee Gay, Debora Jones, Ruth A. Morrison, Lynn Remick, Helen |
author2Str |
Boersma, P. Dee Gay, Debora Jones, Ruth A. Morrison, Lynn Remick, Helen |
ppnlink |
NLEJ188984372 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
up_date |
2024-07-06T08:28:30.753Z |
_version_ |
1803817593868386304 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ19723920X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210705211301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070527s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ19723920X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sex differences in college student-teacher interactions: Fact or fantasy?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract On-site observations analyzing student-teacher interaction for 50 college classes, matched by level, subject, and teacher's sex, revealed no difference in number and type of interactions in which male and female students participated. In female-taught classes, style differences were found: Male students' interactions were characterized by more student-teacher exchanges than females' interactions. From student questionnaires, differences in office visitation patterns were revealed, showing an apparent relationship to sex: Female students visited more female than male instructors. However, closer examination showed the student's major to be the key variable influencing visitation patterns. Results point to the need for testing a variety of variables in addition to sex before drawing conclusions about sex-related behavior.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boersma, P. Dee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gay, Debora</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Ruth A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morrison, Lynn</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Remick, Helen</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Sex roles</subfield><subfield code="d">1975</subfield><subfield code="g">7(1981) vom: Aug., Seite 775-784</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188984372</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2018681-2</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-2762</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1981</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:775-784</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">1981</subfield><subfield code="c">8</subfield><subfield code="h">775-784</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3977394 |