The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery
Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be opera...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
1999 |
---|
Umfang: |
6 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy - 1993, 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:1999 ; month:05 ; pages:278-283 ; extent:6 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ200068741 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ200068741 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210706040646.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 070527s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ200068741 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
264 | 1 | |c 1999 | |
300 | |a 6 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. | ||
533 | |f Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 | ||
700 | 1 | |a Muellner, T. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Nikolic, A. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kubiena, H. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kainberger, F. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mittlboeck, M. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Vécsei, V. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy |d 1993 |g 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 |w (DE-627)NLEJ188990178 |w (DE-600)1473170-8 |x 1433-7347 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:1999 |g month:05 |g pages:278-283 |g extent:6 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-SOJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 7 |j 1999 |c 5 |h 278-283 |g 6 |
matchkey_str |
article:14337347:1999----::hrlomgeirsnnemgniruieeiinai |
---|---|
hierarchy_sort_str |
1999 |
publishDate |
1999 |
allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ200068741 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery 1999 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Muellner, T. oth Nikolic, A. oth Kubiena, H. oth Kainberger, F. oth Mittlboeck, M. oth Vécsei, V. oth in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 1993 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 (DE-627)NLEJ188990178 (DE-600)1473170-8 1433-7347 nnns volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1999 5 278-283 6 |
spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ200068741 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery 1999 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Muellner, T. oth Nikolic, A. oth Kubiena, H. oth Kainberger, F. oth Mittlboeck, M. oth Vécsei, V. oth in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 1993 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 (DE-627)NLEJ188990178 (DE-600)1473170-8 1433-7347 nnns volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1999 5 278-283 6 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ200068741 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery 1999 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Muellner, T. oth Nikolic, A. oth Kubiena, H. oth Kainberger, F. oth Mittlboeck, M. oth Vécsei, V. oth in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 1993 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 (DE-627)NLEJ188990178 (DE-600)1473170-8 1433-7347 nnns volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1999 5 278-283 6 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ200068741 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery 1999 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Muellner, T. oth Nikolic, A. oth Kubiena, H. oth Kainberger, F. oth Mittlboeck, M. oth Vécsei, V. oth in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 1993 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 (DE-627)NLEJ188990178 (DE-600)1473170-8 1433-7347 nnns volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1999 5 278-283 6 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ200068741 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery 1999 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Muellner, T. oth Nikolic, A. oth Kubiena, H. oth Kainberger, F. oth Mittlboeck, M. oth Vécsei, V. oth in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 1993 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 (DE-627)NLEJ188990178 (DE-600)1473170-8 1433-7347 nnns volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 1999 5 278-283 6 |
language |
English |
source |
in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 |
sourceStr |
in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283 volume:7 year:1999 month:05 pages:278-283 extent:6 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Muellner, T. @@oth@@ Nikolic, A. @@oth@@ Kubiena, H. @@oth@@ Kainberger, F. @@oth@@ Mittlboeck, M. @@oth@@ Vécsei, V. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1999-05-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ188990178 |
id |
NLEJ200068741 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ200068741</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706040646.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070527s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ200068741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muellner, T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nikolic, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kubiena, H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kainberger, F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mittlboeck, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vécsei, V.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy</subfield><subfield code="d">1993</subfield><subfield code="g">7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188990178</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473170-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1433-7347</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1999</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:278-283</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">1999</subfield><subfield code="c">5</subfield><subfield code="h">278-283</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ188990178 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1433-7347 |
topic_title |
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
t m tm a n an h k hk f k fk m m mm v v vv |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ188990178 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ188990178 (DE-600)1473170-8 |
title |
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
spellingShingle |
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ200068741 |
title_full |
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
journal |
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy |
journalStr |
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1999 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
278 |
container_volume |
7 |
physical |
6 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
title_sort |
the role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
title_auth |
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
abstract |
Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. |
abstractGer |
Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
title_short |
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Muellner, T. Nikolic, A. Kubiena, H. Kainberger, F. Mittlboeck, M. Vécsei, V. |
author2Str |
Muellner, T. Nikolic, A. Kubiena, H. Kainberger, F. Mittlboeck, M. Vécsei, V. |
ppnlink |
NLEJ188990178 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
up_date |
2024-07-06T01:53:01.359Z |
_version_ |
1803792711795343360 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ200068741</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706040646.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070527s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ200068741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The role of magnetic resonance imaging in routine decision making for meniscal surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This clinical study evaluated factors affecting the decision for meniscal surgery in a patient population seen routinely at a trauma clinic. The study hypothesis was that patients who sustain a traumatic injury to the knee or have a long history of clinical symptoms are likelier to be operated on. We investigated 149 patients clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group A (n = 62) underwent arthroscopic surgery and group B (n = 87) were treated conservatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations with regard to age, gender, injury pattern, period between the injury and first clinical examination, and MRI results. We found no significant difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.1), injury pattern (P = 0.44), or period between injury and first clinical examination (P = 0.5). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (P = 0.044), and, as expected, MRI signal alterations were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P = 0.001). In acutely injured patients MRI helps to establish an accurate diagnosis, and in cases of positive MRI findings in a symptomatic patient, the surgeon should not wait 4–6 weeks but should immediately recommend surgery.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muellner, T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nikolic, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kubiena, H.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kainberger, F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mittlboeck, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vécsei, V.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy</subfield><subfield code="d">1993</subfield><subfield code="g">7(1999) vom: Mai, Seite 278-283</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188990178</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473170-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1433-7347</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1999</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:278-283</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">1999</subfield><subfield code="c">5</subfield><subfield code="h">278-283</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400403 |