Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie
Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1985 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
5 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Oecologia - 1968, 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:66 ; year:1985 ; month:01 ; pages:111-115 ; extent:5 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ205880096 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ205880096 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706185730.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070528s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ205880096 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1985 | |
| 300 | |a 5 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. | ||
| 533 | |f Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Spencer, Stephen R. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cameron, Guy N. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eshelman, Bruce D. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cooper, Linda C. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Williams, Lawrence R. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Oecologia |d 1968 |g 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 |w (DE-627)NLEJ18898738X |w (DE-600)1462019-4 |x 1432-1939 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:66 |g year:1985 |g month:01 |g pages:111-115 |g extent:5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SOJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 66 |j 1985 |c 1 |h 111-115 |g 5 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:14321939:1985----::nlecopcegpemudoaea |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1985 |
| publishDate |
1985 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ205880096 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie 1985 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Spencer, Stephen R. oth Cameron, Guy N. oth Eshelman, Bruce D. oth Cooper, Linda C. oth Williams, Lawrence R. oth in Oecologia 1968 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 (DE-627)NLEJ18898738X (DE-600)1462019-4 1432-1939 nnns volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 66 1985 1 111-115 5 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ205880096 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie 1985 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Spencer, Stephen R. oth Cameron, Guy N. oth Eshelman, Bruce D. oth Cooper, Linda C. oth Williams, Lawrence R. oth in Oecologia 1968 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 (DE-627)NLEJ18898738X (DE-600)1462019-4 1432-1939 nnns volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 66 1985 1 111-115 5 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ205880096 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie 1985 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Spencer, Stephen R. oth Cameron, Guy N. oth Eshelman, Bruce D. oth Cooper, Linda C. oth Williams, Lawrence R. oth in Oecologia 1968 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 (DE-627)NLEJ18898738X (DE-600)1462019-4 1432-1939 nnns volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 66 1985 1 111-115 5 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ205880096 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie 1985 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Spencer, Stephen R. oth Cameron, Guy N. oth Eshelman, Bruce D. oth Cooper, Linda C. oth Williams, Lawrence R. oth in Oecologia 1968 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 (DE-627)NLEJ18898738X (DE-600)1462019-4 1432-1939 nnns volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 66 1985 1 111-115 5 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ205880096 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie 1985 5 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Spencer, Stephen R. oth Cameron, Guy N. oth Eshelman, Bruce D. oth Cooper, Linda C. oth Williams, Lawrence R. oth in Oecologia 1968 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 (DE-627)NLEJ18898738X (DE-600)1462019-4 1432-1939 nnns volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 66 1985 1 111-115 5 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Oecologia 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 |
| sourceStr |
in Oecologia 66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115 volume:66 year:1985 month:01 pages:111-115 extent:5 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Oecologia |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Spencer, Stephen R. @@oth@@ Cameron, Guy N. @@oth@@ Eshelman, Bruce D. @@oth@@ Cooper, Linda C. @@oth@@ Williams, Lawrence R. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1985-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ18898738X |
| id |
NLEJ205880096 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ205880096</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706185730.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070528s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ205880096</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spencer, Stephen R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cameron, Guy N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eshelman, Bruce D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cooper, Linda C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, Lawrence R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Oecologia</subfield><subfield code="d">1968</subfield><subfield code="g">66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ18898738X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1462019-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-1939</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:66</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1985</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-115</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">66</subfield><subfield code="j">1985</subfield><subfield code="c">1</subfield><subfield code="h">111-115</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ18898738X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1432-1939 |
| topic_title |
Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s r s sr srs g n c gn gnc b d e bd bde l c c lc lcc l r w lr lrw |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Oecologia |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ18898738X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Oecologia |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ18898738X (DE-600)1462019-4 |
| title |
Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| spellingShingle |
Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ205880096 |
| title_full |
Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| journal |
Oecologia |
| journalStr |
Oecologia |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1985 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
111 |
| container_volume |
66 |
| physical |
5 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
influence of pocket gopher mounds on a texas coastal prairie |
| title_auth |
Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| abstract |
Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. |
| abstractGer |
Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| title_short |
Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Spencer, Stephen R. Cameron, Guy N. Eshelman, Bruce D. Cooper, Linda C. Williams, Lawrence R. |
| author2Str |
Spencer, Stephen R. Cameron, Guy N. Eshelman, Bruce D. Cooper, Linda C. Williams, Lawrence R. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ18898738X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:17:40.961Z |
| _version_ |
1803805587890241537 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ205880096</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706185730.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070528s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ205880096</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Summary Effects of pocket gopher (Geomys attwateri) mound-building activity on plant community composition and soil nutrient concentrations were investigated in south Texas on both burned and unburned coastal prairie sites. Pocket gophers deposited large amounts of soil which were lower in nutrient content than randomly-collected samples. Above-ground plant biomass was greater around mounds than in random samples mainly because of increased dicots around mounds on the burned area when compared with random samples on the same area. Pocket gophers may have concentrated their activities (and therefore, mounds) in areas with higher dicot biomass on the burned area since they prefer perennial dicots as food, or the presence of mounds may have ameliorated the apparent negative effect of fire on dicots.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spencer, Stephen R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cameron, Guy N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eshelman, Bruce D.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cooper, Linda C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, Lawrence R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Oecologia</subfield><subfield code="d">1968</subfield><subfield code="g">66(1985) vom: Jan., Seite 111-115</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ18898738X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1462019-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-1939</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:66</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1985</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-115</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378561</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">66</subfield><subfield code="j">1985</subfield><subfield code="c">1</subfield><subfield code="h">111-115</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399646 |